pe
pep-10692 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

GIP gut hormone: pig form used in insulin and obesity research

The pig version of a natural gut hormone that tells the pancreas to release more insulin after a meal; used only as a lab research tool.

statussynthesized targetGIPR length42 aa refs6
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.813
pTM0.815
avg pLDDT64.1
ranking score0.675
STRUCTURE · PEP-10692 × GIPR
ranking0.675
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence42 aa
151015202530354042
YAEGTFISDYSIAM DKIRQQDFVNWLLA QKGKKSDWKHNITQ
in the news 33 articles
overview readme

What this is

GIP (porcine) is the 42-amino-acid pig form of gastric inhibitory polypeptide — the gut hormone whose discovery established what we now call the "incretin" axis: a meal arrives in the small intestine, K-cells release GIP, and the pancreas puts out more insulin in response to the same blood glucose level (Yamada 2006). The porcine form is the original molecule that defined the hormone. It was isolated from pig small intestine before any human form was available, and most of the foundational GIP biology — from the original "enterogastrone" framing to the receptor-binding work of the 1980s — used the porcine peptide as the reference ligand (Marks 2020). The stored sequence (YAEGTFISDYSIAMDKIRQQDFVNWLLAQKGKKSDWKHNITQ) is the porcine 1-42 species variant; it differs from the human form at two positions — Arg18 and Ser34 in porcine, His18 and Asn34 in human (Moody, Thim and Valverde, FEBS Letters 1984) — so this card is the pig-origin reference peptide rather than the human hormone tracked as /card/pep-10689.

History

GIP began as a hunt for "enterogastrones" — gut factors thought to inhibit gastric acid secretion. The peptide that became GIP was isolated from porcine small intestine and named for that acid-inhibitory activity; over the following decade the defining biology shifted from acid inhibition to glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin release, and the name "gastric inhibitory polypeptide" was retained as a historical label even as the molecule's importance as an incretin overtook its original framing (Marks, Peptides 2020). The amino-acid sequence work on porcine GIP in the 1970s and early 1980s established the 42-residue structure, and the human form was isolated and sequenced from human small intestine in 1984, at which point the two-residue divergence at positions 18 and 34 was first reported (Moody, Thim and Valverde 1984). The receptor — GIPR, a class B (secretin–VIP family) G-protein-coupled receptor — was cloned from human tissue more than a decade later (Yamada, Genomics 1995), opening the door to the molecular and pharmacological GIPR work that underpins the modern dual-incretin drugs.

What it does

In pigs, infusion of porcine GIP raises plasma insulin in a glucose-dependent way and accelerates glucose clearance from the blood — the same incretin response later characterized in humans (Wolffbrandt 1986). Mechanistically, GIP binds GIPR on pancreatic β-cells; GIPR is a class B GPCR that couples primarily through Gαs to adenylate cyclase, raising intracellular cAMP and engaging PKA and Epac2 pathways to amplify glucose-stimulated insulin release. Beyond the β-cell, GIP signaling has been characterized in adipose tissue, bone, and the central nervous system, and animal work has shown GIPR contributes to pancreatic development and to physiological roles outside acute insulin secretion (Yamada 2006; Prasadan 2011). In contemporary obesity and type-2-diabetes research, GIP's signaling role is the basis for dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs such as tirzepatide (/card/pep-00017) — the dual agonism requires GIPR engagement: antagonising GIPR in human islets reduces the insulin response to tirzepatide (El et al., Nature Metabolism 2023; Coskun et al., Molecular Metabolism 2018). Porcine GIP is used in laboratory work as a well-characterized GIPR ligand against which agonist and antagonist pharmacology can be compared.

Evidence

  • Human: Porcine GIP itself is a research reagent rather than a therapeutic, and is not the subject of registered human therapeutic trials. The downstream therapeutic relevance of GIPR pharmacology is in dual-incretin drugs (tirzepatide, retatrutide) developed on the human GIPR axis (Coskun 2018; El et al. 2023).
  • Animal: Intravenous porcine GIP infusion in pigs produced glucose-dependent stimulation of insulin secretion and increased glucose clearance, establishing the incretin response in the species the peptide was originally isolated from (Wolffbrandt 1986). Mouse studies — including genetic ablation and embryonic-development work — have characterized GIP/GIPR roles in β-cell function, pancreatic development, and extrapancreatic physiology (Yamada 2006; Prasadan 2011).
  • In vitro: GIP binding and Gαs / cAMP-mediated signaling at GIPR is characterized in transfected cell systems and in isolated human islets, including the work that maps the dual-incretin pharmacology of tirzepatide back to GIPR (Coskun 2018; El et al. 2023).

Known effects

  • Glucose-dependent insulin secretion (incretin effect) — Established physiological role; characterized in pig and rodent in-vivo studies and in human islet preparations (Wolffbrandt 1986; Yamada 2006).
  • β-cell signaling via Gαs / cAMP / PKA / Epac2 — Mechanistic, from GIPR receptor pharmacology (Yamada 2006).
  • Extrapancreatic actions in adipose tissue, bone, and CNS — Reported in rodent genetic and pharmacological studies (Yamada 2006; Bailey 2024).
  • Role in pancreatic development — Demonstrated in embryonic mouse pancreas (Prasadan 2011).
  • Use as a reference GIPR agonist in pharmacological research — Including comparator pharmacology for dual GIP/GLP-1 agonists in clinical development (Coskun 2018).

Regulatory status

  • US / EU: Not an approved drug. Porcine GIP is a research peptide; therapeutic agents acting at GIPR are separate molecules (tirzepatide /card/pep-00017 is the leading approved example).
  • WADA: Porcine GIP itself is not separately listed; the WADA Prohibited List status that matters in this space attaches to specific commercial GIPR-targeted drugs rather than to the native incretin peptide as a research reagent.

Related peptides

  • GIP (human) — the 42-residue human form; differs from this porcine sequence at residues 18 and 34.
  • GIP (1-39) — a shorter naturally occurring insulinotropic GIP variant.
  • Tirzepatide — the first approved dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist; its therapeutic mechanism depends on GIPR engagement.
  • Retatrutide — investigational triple GLP-1 / GIP / glucagon receptor agonist built on the GIP backbone.
  • Semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide — single-target GLP-1 receptor agonists, useful as a contrast class against GIP/GLP-1 dual incretin pharmacology.
  • Glucagon — the counter-regulatory pancreatic peptide whose receptor is co-targeted in triple-agonist obesity drugs alongside GIPR.
Hypotheses2 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-11

Does the arginine at position 18 of pig GIP create a stronger grip on the receptor than the near-neutral histidine found in human GIP?

If confirmed, researchers would know that old binding studies done with pig GIP cannot be directly compared to human GIP data, and drug designers could copy that stronger contact point to make better diabetes or obesity medicines.

The hypothesis
The Arg18 substitution in porcine GIP confers modestly higher GIPR affinity than human His18 at physiological pH, because arginine carries a full positive charge at pH 7.4 while histidine is near-neutral, resulting in a stronger electrostatic contribution to receptor binding at that contact position.
Why it’s plausible
The sequence confirms Arg at position 18 in the porcine form versus His in human. Arg is permanently protonated at physiological pH (pKa ~12.5) while His has pKa ~6.0 and is largely uncharged at pH 7.4. If position 18 contacts a negatively charged residue in the GIPR extracellular domain, porcine GIP would present a stronger electrostatic interaction. The ipTM of 0.81 suggests a well-docked complex where such interface contacts are plausible.
Why it matters
If true, it would explain why foundational GIPR binding assays using porcine GIP could not be directly translated to human GIP affinity constants, and would guide the design of GIPR agonists that exploit that contact point for improved potency.
Plausibility.62
Novelty.45
Impact.45
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
notePorcine GIP has Arg18 and Ser34 while human GIP has His18 and Asn34 (Moody, Thim and Valverde, FEBS Letters 1984), as stated in the readme.
[2]
sequencePosition 18 in YAEGTFISDYSIAMDKIRQQDFVNWLLAQKGKKSDWKHNITQ is R (Arg), confirming the porcine-specific positive charge at that site.
[3]
structureBoltz-2 complex ipTM=0.81 indicates a confident peptide-receptor docking pose where interface residues are identifiable.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could a tiny fragment of just nine amino acids from the front of pig GIP activate the GIP receptor just as completely as the full hormone?

If true, it would be possible to build a very short and cheap peptide drug that fully activates the GIP pathway for treating diabetes or obesity, bypassing all the manufacturing complexity of synthesizing the full 42-residue hormone.

The hypothesis
The N-terminal YAEGTFISD nonapeptide of porcine GIP is sufficient to activate GIPR at supraphysiological concentrations because it recapitulates the conserved incretin family N-terminal activation pharmacophore shared by GLP-1 and glucagon, while the remaining 33 residues primarily serve receptor-docking affinity enhancement.
Why it’s plausible
GIP, GLP-1, and glucagon all share the YAEGTFISD (or near-identical) N-terminal sequence. In GLP-1 pharmacology, truncation studies established that the N-terminus carries the activation signal and the C-terminal helix drives affinity. If the same principle applies to porcine GIP, the full 42-mer porcine sequence could be viewed as an affinity-amplified version of an ancient nonapeptide activator, and the 18/34 species differences would only affect C-terminal docking, not intrinsic efficacy.
Why it matters
If intrinsic GIPR efficacy is entirely encoded in the first 9 residues regardless of species origin, porcine and human GIP would have identical maximal receptor activation (Emax) and any measured efficacy differences would reflect affinity rather than signaling quality, changing how we interpret the legacy porcine pharmacology literature.
Plausibility.78
Novelty.20
Impact.45
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
sequenceThe porcine GIP sequence begins YAEGTFISD, which matches the conserved incretin N-terminal motif also present in GLP-1 and glucagon family peptides.
[2]
paper
The literature confirms porcine GIP as a 42 aa single-chain peptide; its role in establishing incretin biology implies shared mechanistic features with the glucagon/GLP-1 superfamily.
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012260
[3]
paper
Historical framing of GIP alongside VIP and motilin as gut peptides with GPCR actions supports shared pharmacophore logic across incretin family members.
doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2020.170276
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.81276535987854 boltz-2
ranking score 0.6754778623580933 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde0.832global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Tyr-Ala-Glu-Gly-Thr-Phe-Ile-Ser-Asp-Tyr-Ser-Ile-Ala-Met-Asp-Lys-Ile-Arg-Gln-Gln-Asp-Phe-Val-Asn-Trp-Leu-Leu-Ala-Gln-Lys-Gly-Lys-Lys-Ser-Asp-Trp-Lys-His-Asn-Ile-Thr-Gln
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). GIP gut hormone: pig form used in insulin and obesity research (pep-10692, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10692
@peptide{pep10692,
  sequence = {YAEGTFISDYSIAMDKIRQQDFVNWLLAQKGKKSDWKHNITQ},
  target   = {gipr},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 571 on ct.gov · 24 on EUCTR · checked 2026-05-22
ct.gov trials 571
with results 36
EUCTR 24
by phase
1phase 22phase 38no phase
by status
5completed1recruiting1not yet recruiting2unknown
references 6 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use