pe
pep-10826 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

CJC-1295: long-acting growth hormone releaser

A synthetic peptide that signals the pituitary gland to release growth hormone; designed to last about a week per dose instead of minutes; experimental, not an approved drug.

statusbioassayed targetGHRHR length29 aa refs2
investigationalghrh-analoggrowth-hormonelong-actingresearch-chemical
snapshot clinical 0% confidence
Class
Long-acting GHRH analog (with DAC); short-acting GHRH analog (without DAC / Modified GRF 1-29)
Status
Not approved by FDA, EMA, MHRA, or equivalent major regulatory authority
Best-supported effect
Sustained GH and IGF-1 elevation in healthy adults following single subcutaneous dose (DAC form; human Phase I, n=43)
Main caveat
Clinical development halted at Phase II discontinuation; no approved indication, no Phase III data, no long-term safety data in any population
status 5 / 5
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.689
pTM0.816
avg pLDDT59.1
ranking score0.795
STRUCTURE · PEP-10826 × GHRHR
ranking0.795
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence29 aa
151015202529
YADAIFTNSYRKVLG QLSARKLLQDIMSR
in the news 3 articles
overview readme

What this is

CJC-1295 is a synthetic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) — the natural pituitary-signaling hormone that tells the brain's master gland to release growth hormone. It was created by ConjuChem Biotechnologies in Montreal in the early 2000s, building on the GHRH(1–29) fragment first characterized at the Salk Institute in the 1980s. ConjuChem's key innovation was a technology called the Drug Affinity Complex (DAC): a reactive linker added to the peptide that covalently binds circulating serum albumin after injection, turning the short-lived peptide into a long-lasting depot. The result is a compound whose half-life extends from minutes (native GHRH) to approximately 6–8 days, enabling infrequent dosing (Jetté and colleagues 2005; Ionescu and colleagues 2006).

CJC-1295 exists in two pharmacologically distinct forms. The DAC-containing version (CJC-1295 DAC) has the albumin-binding linker and produces sustained GHRH-receptor stimulation over days from a single dose. The no-DAC version — also sold as Modified GRF 1–29 — retains the four protease-resistance amino acid substitutions but lacks the albumin linker, giving it a half-life of roughly 30 minutes and a discrete-pulse pharmacology more similar to endogenous GHRH. The two forms are not interchangeable. The stored sequence (YADAIFTNSYRKVLGQLSARKLLQDIMSR) represents the native GHRH(1–29) backbone; the active CJC-1295 molecule carries substitutions at positions 2, 8, 15, and 27, and the DAC form additionally bears the maleimidopropionic acid linker at the C-terminal lysine — neither modification is encoded in that raw sequence.

Neither form has been approved by any major regulatory authority. CJC-1295 is not an FDA-approved drug.

History

CJC-1295 was developed by ConjuChem Biotechnologies in the early 2000s as part of a program to extend the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic peptides. The GHRH(1–29) backbone traces to foundational work from the Salk Institute in the 1980s that established which fragment of the 44-residue native hormone was sufficient for receptor activation. ConjuChem's contribution was twofold: four amino acid substitutions (D-Ala at position 2, Gln at position 8, Ala at position 15, Leu at position 27) that confer resistance to degradation by the enzyme DPP-IV, and the DAC maleimidopropionic acid linker that forms a covalent bond with cysteine-34 on serum albumin after injection (Jetté and colleagues 2005). The albumin-binding chemistry was central to ConjuChem's identity as a biotech — the same Drug Affinity Complex platform had been applied to other peptide programs before CJC-1295.

ConjuChem advanced the DAC form through Phase I dose-escalation trials in healthy adults (Teichman and colleagues 2006) and into a Phase II program in HIV-associated lipodystrophy. The Phase II program was discontinued after a patient death; the attending physician concluded that the death was unrelated to CJC-1295 administration, but the program was not continued and no Phase II results were published. ConjuChem subsequently wound down operations in the early 2010s. CJC-1295 was never approved by any regulatory authority and migrated into research-chemical and compounding-pharmacy channels, where it has remained widely circulated despite the absence of a completed clinical program.

The "CJC" initialism refers to ConjuChem; the DAC suffix distinguishes the albumin-binding version from Modified GRF 1–29, which lacks the linker.

What it does

CJC-1295 stimulates the pituitary gland to release growth hormone (GH). In healthy adults given a single subcutaneous dose of the DAC form, GH levels rose 2- to 10-fold over baseline and remained elevated for six days or more; IGF-1 — the liver-derived downstream hormone that mediates most of GH's anabolic and lipolytic effects — rose 1.5- to 3-fold and remained elevated for 9–11 days. After multiple doses, IGF-1 elevation was sustained for up to 28 days (Teichman and colleagues 2006). A separate pharmacodynamic study confirmed that GH pulse amplitude was approximately 7.5-fold above baseline during CJC-1295 stimulation, and that pulsatile GH secretion continued to occur rather than being replaced by flat, continuous GH elevation (Ionescu and colleagues 2006).

Because CJC-1295 acts upstream of GH rather than supplying GH directly, the negative-feedback loop remains intact: somatostatin released in response to rising GH and IGF-1 levels can still modulate pituitary activity. This is pharmacologically distinct from injecting recombinant human GH, which bypasses pituitary regulation entirely.

Animal work showed that once-daily CJC-1295 normalized growth in GHRH-knockout mice, confirming the mechanism is GHRH-receptor-dependent and capable of supporting growth when endogenous GHRH is absent (Ionescu and colleagues 2006).

Evidence

  • Human: Phase I dose-escalation trial in 43 healthy adults demonstrated dose-dependent, sustained GH and IGF-1 elevation from a single subcutaneous injection of CJC-1295 DAC (Teichman and colleagues 2006). A separate pharmacodynamic study confirmed 7.5-fold GH pulse amplitude increase with preservation of pulsatile GH secretion (Ionescu and colleagues 2006). A Phase II program in HIV-associated lipodystrophy was discontinued after a patient death and no results were published; no Phase III data exist. The entire published human evidence base originates from the single ConjuChem development program and has not been independently replicated.
  • Animal: Growth normalization in GHRH-knockout mice; pharmacokinetic characterization of DAC-form albumin binding; receptor-engagement studies in rat anterior pituitary cells (Jetté and colleagues 2005).
  • In vitro: Receptor binding activity and DPP-IV resistance of DAC conjugates confirmed in cultured rat anterior pituitary cells (Jetté and colleagues 2005).

Known effects

  • Sustained GH elevation in healthy adults — Phase I human evidence; DAC form only; 2–10-fold increase lasting ≥6 days in a single-dose study (Teichman and colleagues 2006)
  • Sustained IGF-1 elevation in healthy adults — Phase I human evidence; 1.5–3-fold increase for 9–11 days single-dose; up to 28 days with multiple doses (Teichman and colleagues 2006)
  • Preserved GH pulsatility — Phase I pharmacodynamic evidence; pulses persist during continuous receptor stimulation (Ionescu and colleagues 2006)
  • Growth normalization in GH-deficient animals — Preclinical; GHRH-knockout mouse model
  • Serum protein profile changes — GH/IGF-1 axis activation produces measurable changes in serum protein composition in normal adult subjects (Ionescu and colleagues, Growth Hormone & IGF Research 2009)
  • Body composition, recovery, sleep quality — No controlled human efficacy data exist for these endpoints; effect claims in these domains are anecdotal and community-reported, not derived from published clinical trials

Safety signals

Signals identified in available published literature:

  • Flushing — Described as common in Phase I human trial and clinical sources; related to GHRH pathway activation; typically mild and transient
  • Injection-site reactions — Mild to moderate; described in Phase I human trial
  • Fluid retention / peripheral edema — Dose-dependent; more pronounced at higher doses and with the DAC form; described in clinical and community sources
  • Mild headache — Occasional; most commonly reported with early doses
  • Drowsiness or fatigue in first week — Noted in available clinical and community-use literature
  • Insulin counter-regulation — GH opposes insulin action; sustained GH and IGF-1 elevation from the DAC form may affect glycemic control; flagged as a theoretical concern in available sources
  • Theoretical IGF-1-mediated cancer promotion — Shared class-level concern for all GH-raising compounds; not addressed by any clinical cancer-incidence endpoint study in available literature
  • Patient death in Phase II program — One death was reported during the discontinued Phase II HIV-lipodystrophy trial; the attending physician adjudicated the death as unrelated to CJC-1295; the program was not published and independent causation review is not available from the literature

Long-term human safety data (beyond 28–49 days) are absent from the published evidence base. Whether sustained IGF-1 elevation carries the same theoretical cancer-promotion risk as exogenous recombinant GH is unresolved. Pituitary desensitization from chronic GHRH-receptor occupancy is a theoretical concern not addressed in any long-duration human study.

Regulatory status

  • US (FDA): Not approved for any indication. Classified as an investigational compound. FDA 503A compounding guidance has restricted commercial compounding of CJC-1295; widely circulated in research-chemical channels, which are not authorized for human use.
  • EU (EMA): Not authorized.
  • UK (MHRA): Not authorized.
  • Australia (TGA): GHRH analogs and GH secretagogues are classified as Schedule 4 prescription-only substances; enforcement against unapproved sales reported in available sources.
  • Canada: Treated as an unapproved investigational agent, analogous to the US position.
  • WADA: Prohibited at all times under S2 (Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors, Related Substances and Mimetics). Validated LC-MS/MS and immuno-PCR detection methods for CJC-1295 have been published (Guddat and colleagues; Baumgärtel and colleagues); athlete positive tests have been documented in the antidoping literature. Equine detection windows of up to eight days post-administration have been reported in population studies.

Myths and misconceptions

  • "CJC-1295 is safe because it uses your body's own pathways." The pulsatile-preservation argument is real — feedback loops stay intact and side effects like edema and carpal tunnel are typically milder than with flat exogenous recombinant GH. But the downstream mediator is the same: IGF-1. The theoretical cancer-promotion concerns that attach to any sustained IGF-1 elevation attach here too. "Safer in degree" does not mean "safe in kind."
  • "CJC-1295 DAC and no-DAC are the same drug at different doses." They are different molecules with different pharmacology. The DAC form has a maleimidopropionic acid linker covalently binding serum albumin, producing a half-life of approximately 6–8 days and sustained receptor engagement. The no-DAC form (Modified GRF 1–29) lacks this linker and clears in roughly 30 minutes, producing discrete GH pulses. Dosing cadence, receptor-engagement duration, and GH secretion profiles differ materially.
  • "CJC-1295 had a pharmaceutical sponsor so it must be approved." ConjuChem advanced it to Phase II, but the Phase II program was discontinued and the compound was never approved by any major regulatory authority. Reaching Phase II is not FDA approval, and no licensed drug exists.
  • "CJC-1295 is undetectable in drug testing." Published antidoping research has established LC-MS/MS and immuno-PCR detection methods specifically for CJC-1295 and related GHRH analogs. Equine studies show detection for up to eight days post-administration, and athlete positive tests have been documented.

Mechanism

CJC-1295 is a GHRH-receptor agonist. The GHRH receptor (GHRHR) is a class B G protein-coupled receptor expressed on somatotroph cells in the anterior pituitary. Binding of CJC-1295 to GHRHR activates adenylyl cyclase, raising intracellular cAMP levels and engaging the PKA signaling cascade that promotes GH gene transcription and GH secretion. Downstream, GH acts on liver, adipose tissue, and muscle; hepatic GH-receptor activation drives IGF-1 synthesis, the principal mediator of GH's anabolic and lipolytic effects.

The four amino acid substitutions relative to native GHRH(1–29) — D-Ala at position 2, Gln at position 8, Ala at position 15, Leu at position 27 — confer resistance to enzymatic degradation, particularly cleavage by DPP-IV, without substantially altering receptor binding affinity (Jetté and colleagues 2005). These substitutions extend the pharmacologically active lifetime of the free (non-albumin-bound) peptide.

The DAC form adds a maleimidopropionic acid linker at the C-terminal lysine that reacts with cysteine-34 on circulating serum albumin in vivo, forming a covalent conjugate. Albumin's long plasma half-life (~19 days) acts as a circulating depot, slowly releasing active CJC-1295 and sustaining GHRHR activation for approximately 6–8 days per dose (Jetté and colleagues 2005; Ionescu and colleagues 2006). This sustained engagement means CJC-1295 DAC itself does not produce pulsatile signaling — but intrinsic pituitary rhythm and the independent ghrelin/GHS-R1a axis continue operating, so GH pulses still occur, as confirmed in human pharmacodynamic studies (Ionescu and colleagues 2006).

The no-DAC form (Modified GRF 1–29) lacks the albumin linker. It clears in approximately 30 minutes and produces discrete-pulse GHRHR engagement more closely mimicking endogenous GHRH pulsatility.

Open questions

  • Long-term human safety: Phase I data covers 28–49 days in healthy adults. No chronic human safety data exist. Whether sustained IGF-1 elevation from the DAC form carries the same theoretical cancer-promotion risk as exogenous recombinant GH — or whether the preserved-feedback argument translates into a materially different risk ceiling — is not resolved.
  • Phase II outcome ambiguity: The discontinued Phase II HIV-lipodystrophy trial was never published. The attending physician's adjudication that the patient death was unrelated to CJC-1295 is not independently reviewable from available literature. The nature of the safety signal is not fully characterized in the public record.
  • No-DAC human efficacy gap: Both published human pharmacodynamic studies tested only the DAC form. No equivalent controlled human efficacy data exist for Modified GRF 1–29, despite community and clinical use having shifted substantially toward the no-DAC version.
  • Independent replication: The entire published human evidence base originates from a single development program (ConjuChem, mid-2000s). No independently sponsored human replication of the Phase I findings is described in available literature.
  • Pituitary desensitization: Whether sustained GHRHR occupancy from chronic DAC-form use downregulates receptor responsiveness over time is not addressed by any long-duration human study.
  • Combination with GHRPs: CJC-1295 paired with a growth hormone-releasing peptide such as ipamorelin is the dominant reported community-use pattern, but no controlled human endpoint trial testing this combination appears in available literature. The synergistic rationale is pharmacological and mechanistic rather than clinical-endpoint-based.
  • Cardiovascular endpoints: Chronic effects of secretagogue-driven GH/IGF-1 elevation on cardiac mass, fluid balance, and cardiovascular risk have not been characterized in dedicated endpoint trials.

Related peptides

  • Sermorelin — native GHRH(1–29) amide; shorter half-life than CJC-1295 DAC; the approved clinical comparator for GH deficiency testing
  • Tesamorelin — another modified GHRH(1–29) analog; FDA-approved for HIV-associated lipodystrophy; the most clinically validated GHRH analog; shares the modified GRF backbone lineage with CJC-1295
  • Ipamorelin — a selective GHRP acting via the ghrelin/GHS-R1a receptor; frequently discussed alongside CJC-1295 as a complementary GH-secretagogue pairing
Hypotheses6 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-11

Could the slow, steady trickle of CJC-1295 from albumin be too gentle to trigger the receptor's own off-switch?

If true, it would explain why this drug does not blunt the body's natural growth hormone rhythm, making it safer for long-term use. Doctors and patients managing growth disorders could have more confidence that weekly injections do not disrupt normal hormonal cycles.

The hypothesis
Sustained, non-pulsatile GHRHR stimulation by CJC-1295 DAC preserves somatotroph GH pulsatility through a receptor-level desensitization escape mechanism, whereby tonic low-level cAMP signaling from albumin-tethered peptide is insufficient to trigger beta-arrestin-mediated GHRHR internalization, unlike bolus agonism.
Why it’s plausible
The Ionescu 2006 study showed GH pulsatility persists after 7 days of continuous CJC-1295 exposure, which is paradoxical for a continuously present agonist. GHRHR is a class B GPCR whose desensitization kinetics depend on agonist concentration and duration. The albumin depot likely delivers sub-saturating receptor occupancy continuously rather than a high-amplitude pulse, which may be below the threshold for robust beta-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization, allowing pulsatility generators (SRIF neurons) to remain the dominant rhythm driver.
Why it matters
Understanding this mechanism would clarify why long-acting GHRH analogs do not blunt the GH axis and would inform dosing strategies for GH secretagogues broadly. It could also explain why depot-based delivery is preferable to continuous infusion for GHRH agonists, with implications for formulation design.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.55
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
Persistence of GH pulsatility after 7 days of continuous GHRH analog exposure is documented, suggesting the receptor does not fully desensitize under sustained ligand presence
doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1702
[2]
noteDAC form produces sustained GHRH-receptor stimulation over days; albumin-binding converts peptide into a slow-release depot delivering sub-saturating receptor occupancy
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could weekly CJC-1295 injections help reverse fatty liver disease in obese people by bringing back the growth hormone pulses that keep the liver from storing too much fat?

If true, it could offer a new treatment option for the millions of people with fatty liver disease linked to obesity, who currently have very few approved medicines. It might reduce liver inflammation and scarring risk without requiring daily injections or causing the side effects of high-dose growth hormone.

The hypothesis
CJC-1295-driven GH secretion pulses may attenuate non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) progression by restoring hepatic GH receptor sensitivity and reducing de novo lipogenesis, independent of IGF-1 normalization, in individuals with GH deficiency secondary to obesity.
Why it’s plausible
GH deficiency in obese adults is associated with visceral fat accumulation and NAFLD. Hepatic GH receptor signaling suppresses SREBP-1c-driven lipogenesis directly. Obese individuals have blunted GHRH-driven GH pulses, and restoring GH amplitude with a long-acting GHRH analog could re-engage hepatic GH receptor signaling even if IGF-1 levels remain only modestly elevated. The sustained but pulsatile GH profile maintained under CJC-1295 (as shown by Ionescu 2006) would mimic the physiological anti-lipogenic GH signal more closely than exogenous GH injections.
Why it matters
NAFLD affects a large fraction of obese adults and has limited pharmacological options. If CJC-1295 can reduce hepatic fat by restoring endogenous GH pulsatility rather than supraphysiological GH levels, it would offer a safer lipotropic mechanism than direct GH therapy while being more convenient than daily GH injections. This would represent a mechanistically novel repositioning for an already-characterized compound.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.60
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
CJC-1295 preserves GH pulsatility under sustained GHRH analog exposure; pulsatile GH is the physiologically relevant signal for hepatic anti-lipogenic action
doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1702
[2]
noteCJC-1295 DAC produces 6-8 day half-life with sustained GHRH receptor stimulation; could restore blunted GH pulses in GH-deficient obese individuals
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could CJC-1295 help elderly people maintain muscle mass by a route that does not require raising the growth factor that worries oncologists?

If true, it could open a safer path to treating muscle wasting in older adults. The millions of people who lose strength and independence with age might gain access to a therapy without the cancer-promotion concerns that have stalled other growth hormone treatments.

The hypothesis
CJC-1295 may reduce age-related skeletal muscle loss (sarcopenia) independently of IGF-1 elevation by directly amplifying GH-driven protein synthesis in muscle through a GH receptor pathway that remains partially functional in aged tissue where hepatic IGF-1 production is impaired.
Why it’s plausible
Aging attenuates hepatic IGF-1 responsiveness to GH, yet some anabolic GH effects on muscle (fatty acid oxidation, amino acid uptake) are IGF-1 independent. If CJC-1295 elevates GH amplitude sufficiently to engage residual direct GH receptor signaling in aged skeletal muscle, it could deliver anabolic benefit even in populations with blunted IGF-1 axes. The sustained GH exposure profile from DAC chemistry is more consistent with IGF-1-independent signaling windows than a brief pulse.
Why it matters
Sarcopenia affects a large proportion of elderly individuals and has no approved pharmacological treatment. Demonstrating an IGF-1-independent anabolic mechanism would expand the patient population that could benefit and reduce concern about IGF-1-linked proliferative risks (e.g., cancer promotion), which is a major safety barrier for GH secretagogue development.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.50
Impact.75
Basis · grounding1 paper · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteCJC-1295 DAC extends half-life to 6-8 days, producing sustained GH elevation; the pharmacology differs fundamentally from pulsatile native GHRH
[2]
paper
Sustained GHRH analog exposure elevates GH over days; downstream metabolic and anabolic endpoints in aging populations not fully characterized
doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1702
openupdated 2026-06-11

Do the four chemical changes in CJC-1295 improve the shape-fit to the growth hormone receptor compared to the natural starting peptide?

If true, it could guide design of next-generation growth-hormone therapies that work at lower doses. Patients with growth deficiency or muscle-wasting conditions might benefit from more precisely engineered analogs.

The hypothesis
The moderate interface confidence (ipTM ~0.69) of the CJC-1295 backbone docking to GHRHR reflects the absence of the four protease-resistance substitutions (positions 2, 8, 15, 27) and the DAC linker in the stored sequence, meaning the native GHRH(1-29) sequence has intrinsically lower receptor-binding affinity and docking geometry than the active CJC-1295 molecule, and the substitutions collectively drive a conformational change that improves helix stabilization at the receptor interface.
Why it’s plausible
The stored sequence is explicitly the unmodified GHRH(1-29) backbone, not the pharmacologically active CJC-1295 variant. An ipTM of ~0.69 is borderline for a confident peptide-receptor complex. If the four substitutions (Ala2, Ser8, Gln15, Leu27 or equivalent) introduce alpha-helical rigidity in the N-terminal activation domain, the native sequence would be expected to dock less tightly. This would explain the prediction score without invoking target mis-annotation.
Why it matters
If confirmed, this means structure-activity optimization of GHRH analogs should prioritize the helical propensity of the N-terminal segment. It would also validate using the unmodified backbone as a lower-affinity comparator in computational screens, and clarify why DAC-free modified GRF 1-29 still outperforms native GHRH(1-29) in vivo.
Plausibility.78
Novelty.35
Impact.50
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
structureopenfold3-mlx/complex ipTM=0.69 for unmodified GHRH(1-29) backbone against GHRHR; borderline confidence suggests suboptimal interface geometry for this exact sequence
[2]
noteActive CJC-1295 carries substitutions at positions 2, 8, 15, and 27 for protease resistance; the stored sequence lacks these and the DAC linker
[3]
paper
CJC-1295 identified as long-lasting GRF analog activating GRF receptor, implying the modified sequence has superior pharmacological properties relative to the native backbone
doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1286
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could CJC-1295 bind to a related receptor in lung and pancreatic tissue, beyond its intended target in the pituitary?

If true, it would help explain some side effects reported by users and could inform cleaner next-generation designs. Patients and clinicians would have a better picture of the full biological footprint of this widely used research compound.

The hypothesis
The GHRH(1-29) sequence of CJC-1295 has off-target agonist activity at the vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 (VPAC2), and the four active-form substitutions differentially alter this cross-reactivity relative to native GHRH, meaning CJC-1295 has a different VPAC2/GHRHR selectivity ratio than its parent peptide.
Why it’s plausible
GHRH, VIP, and PACAP are structurally related class B GPCR ligands sharing an N-terminal alpha-helical activation motif. The sequence YADAIFTNSYR in positions 1-11 of CJC-1295 overlaps with the helical activation domain conserved across this family. VPAC2 is expressed in pancreatic beta cells, lung, and brain, and cross-reactivity could contribute to off-target metabolic or cardiovascular effects. The substitutions at positions 2, 8, 15, and 27 could either tighten or loosen VPAC2 selectivity independently of GHRHR affinity.
Why it matters
If the active CJC-1295 molecule has measurable VPAC2 agonism, this could explain some metabolic side effects seen in clinical use and would need to be characterized for any regulatory submission. Conversely, if the substitutions reduce VPAC2 activity while preserving GHRHR potency, they represent a selectivity engineering lesson applicable to the whole secretin peptide family.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.65
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 1 computed/note
[1]
sequenceN-terminal YADAIFT motif (positions 1-7) is homologous to the VIP/PACAP family activation domain; His-Ala at positions 1-2 is conserved across GHRH, VIP, and PACAP family members
[2]
paper
CJC-1295 activates GRF receptor on anterior pituitary; receptor selectivity profiling against related class B GPCRs not reported in this study
doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1286
openupdated 2026-06-11

Is the end of the CJC-1295 chain just a structural handle for attaching the long-acting protein carrier, with no role in activating the receptor?

If true, drug designers could swap that tail for better handles, making future versions easier to manufacture or longer-lasting. This would lower production costs and potentially improve dosing convenience for patients needing growth hormone therapy.

The hypothesis
The C-terminal DIMSR segment of CJC-1295 (positions 25-29) is dispensable for GHRHR activation but provides a critical conformational scaffold that positions the DAC maleimide linker on the C-terminal lysine for optimal albumin conjugation geometry, and truncation or substitution of this segment would disproportionately impair albumin binding relative to receptor agonism.
Why it’s plausible
Native GHRH(1-29) activity resides primarily in the N-terminal 17-18 residues. The C-terminal extension including DIMSR likely contributes helical amphipathicity and backbone rigidity rather than direct receptor contact. The DAC chemistry attaches at a lysine, and the steric environment around this lysine in the folded peptide would determine the efficiency of maleimide-albumin conjugation. A disordered or poorly positioned C-terminus would reduce coupling yield or produce non-functional conjugates.
Why it matters
If the C-terminal segment is primarily a linker-positioning scaffold, it could be replaced with non-natural scaffolds optimized for coupling efficiency, PEGylation, or alternative half-life extension strategies (e.g., FcRn-binding motifs), without sacrificing receptor potency. This would be a generalizable design principle for albumin-binding peptide drugs across the secretin family.
Plausibility.40
Novelty.60
Impact.55
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence YADAIFTNSYRKVLGQLSARKLLQDIMSR: C-terminal DIMSR (positions 25-29) is distal from the N-terminal activation domain; no established receptor contact residues in this region from GHRH SAR literature
[2]
noteDAC linker (maleimidopropionic acid) attaches at C-terminal lysine; the stored sequence lacks this modification, making the C-terminal geometry of the unconjugated peptide relevant to conjugation efficiency
[3]
paper
CJC-1295 identified via DAC technology conjugating to albumin; C-terminal modification site described but structural requirements for efficient conjugation not fully characterized
doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1286
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.6886524558067322 openfold3-mlx
ranking score 0.7954307198524475 openfold3-mlx
structural qualityopenfold3
0
metricvaluenote
gpde0.531global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.163fraction disordered
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.689interface quality
3-letter notation
Tyr-Ala-Asp-Ala-Ile-Phe-Thr-Asn-Ser-Tyr-Arg-Lys-Val-Leu-Gly-Gln-Leu-Ser-Ala-Arg-Lys-Leu-Leu-Gln-Asp-Ile-Met-Ser-Arg
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weightsaedd8f3eb814e392…
hardwareapple_m4_base_16gb
mlx version0.31.1
python3.14.3
random seed42
msa strategycolabfold
diffusion samples1
runtime93s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-05-03
python3 openfold3/run_openfold.py predict --query_json {query.json} --runner_yaml examples/example_runner_yamls/mlx_runner.yml --output_dir {output_dir} --num_diffusion_samples 1
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). CJC-1295: long-acting growth hormone releaser (pep-10826, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10826
@peptide{pep10826,
  sequence = {YADAIFTNSYRKVLGQLSARKLLQDIMSR},
  target   = {ghrhr},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {bioassayed}
}
related peptides 2 by signal overlap
clinical trials 1 on ct.gov · 1 on EUCTR · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials 1
EUCTR 1
PubMed RCT 1
by phase
1phase 2
by status
1terminated
references 0 papers · 2 non-peer
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use