pe
pep-10683 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Migraine-receptor blocker (alpha-CGRP 8-37, rat fragment)

A synthetic peptide fragment that blocks the receptor linked to migraine headaches; used only as a lab research tool, not an approved drug.

statussynthesized targetCALCR length30 aa refs8
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.644
pTM0.672
avg pLDDT41.6
ranking score0.781
STRUCTURE · PEP-10683 × CALCR
ranking0.781
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence30 aa
151015202530
VTHRLAGLLSRSGGV VKDNFVPTNVGSEAF
in the news 11 articles
overview readme

What this is

Alpha-CGRP(8-37) is a 30-amino acid synthetic peptide that blocks the CGRP receptor — the molecular target responsible for the vasodilation and nerve signaling that underlies migraine headaches. It is a research tool compound, not a therapeutic agent. The stored sequence (VTHRLAGLLSRSGGVVKDNFVPTNVGSEAF) is the C-terminal 30 residues of rat alpha-calcitonin gene-related peptide (alpha-CGRP, residues 8–37 of the full 37-residue peptide); it lacks the N-terminal seven residues that form a Cys²–Cys⁷ disulfide-bonded ring — the structural feature required for receptor activation. Without that ring, the peptide can occupy the CGRP receptor without switching it on, making it a competitive antagonist rather than an agonist. The human version of this fragment differs at position 35 of full alpha-CGRP (Glu in rat, Lys in human), so the stored sequence is specifically the rat form.

Alpha-CGRP itself is co-produced with calcitonin from the same gene (CALCA) by tissue-specific alternative RNA splicing: thyroid C-cells splice the transcript to make calcitonin, while neurons splice it to make CGRP — one of the first examples of a single gene producing two functionally distinct peptides. The CGRP receptor is a heterodimeric class B GPCR consisting of CLR (calcitonin receptor-like receptor) and RAMP1 (receptor activity-modifying protein 1); CLR alone is pharmacologically silent and requires RAMP1 to reach the cell surface and bind CGRP (Hay et al. 2018; Barwell et al. 2012).


History

CGRP was discovered in 1982–1983 through molecular biology rather than classical biochemistry. Rosenfeld and colleagues at the Salk Institute found that the human calcitonin gene (CALCA) produces two distinct mRNAs by alternative RNA splicing: the exon-4-including transcript produces calcitonin in thyroid C-cells, while an exon-5-including transcript produces CGRP in neurons. This was one of the first demonstrations of tissue-specific alternative splicing generating functionally distinct proteins from a single gene, and the resulting 37-amino acid peptide (CGRP) had no known function at the time of its prediction. Human CGRP was subsequently isolated and its sequence confirmed.

The CGRP receptor's molecular identity resisted standard cloning approaches for years because it required co-expression of two proteins, CLR and RAMP1, to reconstitute activity. The discovery of RAMPs by McLatchie and colleagues in 1998 resolved this: RAMP1 is required for CLR to reach the plasma membrane and to configure the binding site for CGRP rather than adrenomedullin. This finding explained the earlier pharmacological characterization by establishing the molecular receptor complex that alpha-CGRP(8-37) targets (Barwell et al. 2012).

Alpha-CGRP(8-37) was developed as a pharmacological tool in the early 1990s by probing structure-activity relationships of CGRP: removing the N-terminal seven residues including the Cys²–Cys⁷ disulfide ring yielded a fragment that competitively blocked CGRP-induced vasodilation in isolated tissue preparations without itself producing vasodilation. It became the standard pharmacological probe for attributing biological responses to the CGRP receptor — preceding the small-molecule and antibody CGRP antagonists by approximately two decades.

The therapeutic relevance of CGRP receptor antagonism was established in part through work demonstrating that intravenous CGRP infusion provokes migraine attacks in susceptible individuals, and that CGRP levels rise in jugular venous blood during spontaneous migraine attacks. These findings — supported by mechanistic experiments using alpha-CGRP(8-37) in dural vasculature models — provided the pharmacological rationale for developing clinical CGRP antagonists. Small-molecule gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant) and monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or CLR/RAMP1 (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab) have since received regulatory approval for migraine treatment and prevention, representing the clinical translation of biology first probed with alpha-CGRP(8-37).


What it does

Competitive antagonism at CLR/RAMP1 (CGRP receptor): Alpha-CGRP(8-37) competes with full-length CGRP for binding to the CLR/RAMP1 receptor complex. It binds with lower affinity than full-length CGRP — because the N-terminal ring is absent — but at sufficient concentrations, it occupies the receptor and blocks CGRP-induced Gs signaling (cAMP elevation), vasodilation, and neuropeptide co-release effects. In isolated vascular preparations such as rat mesenteric arteries and dural blood vessels, alpha-CGRP(8-37) antagonizes CGRP-induced vasodilation in a concentration-dependent manner, which was the original assay system in which it was characterized.

CGRP receptor pharmacology dissection: Alpha-CGRP(8-37) has been used to distinguish CLR/RAMP1 (CGRP receptor)-mediated effects from CALCR/RAMP1 (amylin receptor, AMY1R)-mediated effects. CGRP shows cross-reactivity at amylin receptors because CLR is structurally related to CALCR and both can associate with RAMP1. The affinity of alpha-CGRP(8-37) at amylin receptors differs from its affinity at the CGRP receptor, providing a pharmacological tool for receptor subtype attribution in systems where CGRP acts on multiple receptor complexes — relevant in pancreatic islets and in bone, where calcitonin, amylin, and CGRP receptor systems overlap (Hay et al. 2018).

Migraine neurovascular pharmacology: In dural vasculature models relevant to migraine pathophysiology, alpha-CGRP(8-37) inhibits trigeminal nerve-stimulation-induced vasodilation and blocks exogenously applied CGRP. These experiments in rat and cat models established the causal role of endogenous CGRP in trigemino-vascular activation — the proposed peripheral component of migraine. Alpha-CGRP(8-37) provided early mechanistic evidence that antagonizing the CGRP receptor could interrupt this pathway, preceding and motivating the development of clinical CGRP receptor antagonists.

RAMP1-dependent receptor selectivity: Because CLR requires RAMP1 to form the CGRP receptor, alpha-CGRP(8-37) is selective for CLR/RAMP1 over CLR/RAMP2 (the AM1 receptor). RAMP1 converts CLR's binding preference from adrenomedullin to CGRP — a receptor-subtype switch controlled by which RAMP is present. This selectivity makes alpha-CGRP(8-37) useful for characterizing RAMP1-specific CLR pharmacology in mixed-RAMP expression systems (Advances in Pharmacology 2020).


Evidence

  • Human: No registered clinical trials for alpha-CGRP(8-37) as an intervention. The peptide is used exclusively as a research tool compound in pharmacological and mechanistic studies; it has not entered human clinical development. Clinical translation of CGRP receptor antagonism has occurred through gepants (rimegepant, ubrogepant, atogepant — FDA-approved for migraine) and monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab — FDA-approved for migraine prevention), which descend mechanistically from the biology established with alpha-CGRP(8-37) but are distinct molecular entities.
  • In vitro / ex vivo: Hay and colleagues (2018) provided an IUPHAR consensus review of the calcitonin/CGRP receptor family — covering receptor nomenclature, molecular composition (CLR/RAMP1 = CGRP receptor; CLR/RAMP2 = AM1 receptor; CALCR/RAMP1 = AMY1 receptor), ligand pharmacology, and allosteric roles of RAMPs — and characterized alpha-CGRP(8-37) as the prototypic CGRP receptor-selective competitive antagonist peptide with defined affinity at CLR/RAMP1 and selectivity relative to calcitonin receptor complexes (Hay et al. 2018). Barwell and colleagues (2012) characterized the molecular basis of CLR function, explaining how RAMP1 converts CLR from an adrenomedullin-responsive receptor to a CGRP-responsive receptor, and established the framework for understanding why alpha-CGRP(8-37) binds without activating — the C-terminal region of CGRP provides binding affinity while the N-terminal ring provides the agonist trigger (Barwell et al. 2012). The allosteric role of RAMPs in determining receptor pharmacological identity and RAMP1-dependent selectivity of alpha-CGRP(8-37) was further characterized in a dedicated RAMP pharmacology review (Advances in Pharmacology 2020).

Myths and misconceptions

  • "Alpha-CGRP(8-37) targets the calcitonin receptor (CALCR)." Alpha-CGRP(8-37) is an antagonist primarily at the CGRP receptor — the CLR/RAMP1 heterodimer. The calcitonin receptor (CALCR) is a distinct protein that associates with RAMP1, RAMP2, or RAMP3 to form amylin receptor subtypes. While alpha-CGRP(8-37) shows some cross-reactivity at amylin receptors (CALCR-based complexes) due to structural family similarity, its primary pharmacological use is for CLR/RAMP1 blockade. Misidentifying the target as CALCR rather than CLR leads to incorrect mechanistic interpretation of experimental results.
  • "Rat and human alpha-CGRP(8-37) are identical and interchangeable in pharmacological studies." The stored sequence is rat alpha-CGRP(8-37), which differs from human alpha-CGRP(8-37) at position 35 of the 37-residue full sequence (Glu in rat, Lys in human). While this single-residue difference does not dramatically alter receptor binding affinity, pharmacological constants measured with rat alpha-CGRP(8-37) may differ quantitatively from those obtained with the human peptide. Studies comparing CGRP receptor pharmacology across species or using rat versus human analogs should account for this.
  • "CGRP receptor antagonism with peptide tools like alpha-CGRP(8-37) directly predicts efficacy of clinical anti-CGRP therapies." The gepants and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies target the same receptor-ligand interaction that alpha-CGRP(8-37) probes. However, quantitative translation from peptide tool experiments to clinical outcomes is indirect: alpha-CGRP(8-37) has short half-life, poor CNS penetration, and no oral bioavailability — all of which are overcome in clinical agents (gepants designed for CNS penetration; monoclonal antibodies with weeks-long half-life). The mechanistic insight from alpha-CGRP(8-37) experiments informed clinical development, but the peptide's pharmacokinetics do not model the clinical drugs.

Common questions

Q: Why does removing the N-terminal ring of CGRP (generating alpha-CGRP[8-37]) convert an agonist into an antagonist? A: Full-length CGRP agonism requires two components: the C-terminal region (retained in alpha-CGRP[8-37]) binds to the CLR/RAMP1 extracellular domain, docking the peptide; the N-terminal ring structure (Cys²–Cys⁷ disulfide loop) then inserts into the receptor's transmembrane bundle and triggers the conformational change that activates Gs signaling. This two-step mechanism is common across class B GPCRs — the C-terminus provides binding affinity, the N-terminus provides agonist activity. Alpha-CGRP(8-37) retains the C-terminal binding contact but lacks the N-terminal activating trigger, resulting in a molecule that occupies the receptor without activating it.

Q: How did alpha-CGRP(8-37) contribute to developing clinical migraine treatments? A: Developing anti-CGRP therapies required demonstrating that CGRP is causally involved in migraine, not merely a correlate. Experiments with alpha-CGRP(8-37) in isolated dural vessel preparations showed that CGRP receptor antagonism blocked trigeminal stimulation-induced vasodilation, implicating the CGRP/CLR-RAMP1 axis in the neurogenic inflammation pathway proposed to underlie migraine. Combined with clinical observations (CGRP levels rise during migraine attacks; CGRP infusion provokes migraine), these mechanistic pharmacology experiments provided the dual experimental-clinical basis that justified pharmaceutical investment in gepants and anti-CGRP antibodies.

Q: What is the difference between alpha-CGRP and beta-CGRP? A: Alpha-CGRP and beta-CGRP are distinct peptides encoded by different genes: alpha-CGRP from CALCA (the calcitonin gene), beta-CGRP from CALCB. Both are 37 amino acids and differ by only 3 residues. Both activate the CLR/RAMP1 CGRP receptor with comparable potency and are vasodilatory neuropeptides expressed in sensory neurons. Alpha-CGRP is the predominant form in the trigeminal ganglia and perivascular sensory nerve terminals relevant to migraine; beta-CGRP is expressed more in enteric neurons. Clinical anti-CGRP antibodies target both forms. The stored card sequence is specifically rat alpha-CGRP(8-37).


Related peptides

  • Peptide YY — Peptide YY: another gut peptide where N-terminal truncation (PYY[3-36] vs PYY[1-36]) creates a pharmacologically distinct variant with altered receptor selectivity — a parallel to alpha-CGRP(8-37)'s conversion from agonist (full CGRP) to antagonist by N-terminal truncation
  • Corticotropin — ACTH/Corticotropin: illustrates how prohormone processing and N-terminal truncation can profoundly alter receptor pharmacology, converting full agonists into partial agonists or antagonists, as occurs in the calcitonin/CGRP receptor family context
  • ACTH (7–39) — ACTH(7-39): a direct structural parallel — just as ACTH(7-39) loses the N-terminal pharmacophore residues of full ACTH to become a partial agonist/antagonist, alpha-CGRP(8-37) loses the N-terminal Cys²–Cys⁷ ring of CGRP to become an antagonist
Hypotheses4 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this peptide shut down all receptor activity, or only some of it?

If true, researchers would understand why this tool peptide and clinical migraine drugs give different results in experiments. For drug developers, this could reveal new ways to fine-tune receptor blockade for better migraine treatment with fewer side effects.

The hypothesis
Alpha-CGRP(8-37) acts as a biased antagonist at the CGRP receptor, blocking Gs/cAMP signaling while failing to inhibit or even potentiating beta-arrestin recruitment, thereby producing a functionally distinct signaling profile from small-molecule CGRP antagonists.
Why it’s plausible
Peptide ligands at class B GPCRs frequently display biased signaling compared to small molecules. The truncated CGRP fragment occupies the orthosteric site but lacks the N-terminal activation motif, so it may stabilize a receptor conformation that differs from both the active state and the conformation stabilized by small-molecule antagonists. Beta-arrestin recruitment at CGRP receptors has been implicated in receptor trafficking and sustained signaling; a peptide antagonist that differentially affects these pathways would have distinct functional consequences.
Why it matters
If the peptide is a biased antagonist, its use as a research tool would yield different cellular phenotypes than clinical gepants (small-molecule CGRP antagonists), potentially explaining discrepancies between peptide-based preclinical studies and small-molecule clinical outcomes.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.70
Impact.70
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
noteThe readme describes the fragment as a competitive antagonist that occupies the receptor without switching it on, but does not address whether it differentially affects downstream signaling pathways beyond cAMP.
[2]
sourceHistorical literature on CGRP pharmacology and receptor characterization provides context that class B GPCR peptide ligands can produce complex signaling profiles.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Can scientists attach longer-lasting or targeting tags to this peptide without destroying its blocking ability?

If true, this peptide could be upgraded from a lab tool into a real drug candidate more quickly. For biotech companies, having a proven safe spot for modifications would cut years off development time for new migraine therapies.

The hypothesis
The Gly-Ser dipeptide at positions 15-16 of the fragment (residues 22-23 of full CGRP) acts as a flexible linker that tolerates insertion of additional residues or non-natural amino acids without abolishing antagonist activity, providing an engineering handle for half-life extension or targeting moiety conjugation.
Why it’s plausible
The sequence contains ...SRSGGVVK... where the G-G pair at positions 15-16 of the fragment (GG) is flanked by Ser and Val. Glycine residues have minimal side chains and confer backbone flexibility. In many peptide therapeutics, Gly-Gly or Gly-Ser motifs serve as tolerated insertion points for PEGylation, fatty acid conjugation, or affinity tag attachment. Given that this region is C-terminal to the core helical binding epitope and N-terminal to a more hydrophilic C-terminal tail, modifications here may be structurally permissive.
Why it matters
A permissive modification site would enable direct engineering of the native peptide scaffold into a longer-acting or targeted therapeutic without the need for de novo peptide design, accelerating development of a CGRP antagonist with drug-like properties.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.55
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence positions 15-16 are Gly-Gly (GG), flanked by Ser14 and Val17, forming a flexible region between the more hydrophobic N-terminal portion and the polar C-terminal tail.
[2]
noteThe readme describes the fragment as a research tool compound, not a therapeutic agent, implying the native sequence lacks drug-like properties that could be addressed by engineering at tolerant positions.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this peptide block more than just the CGRP receptor?

If true, scientists would need to reconsider what past experiments actually measured. For migraine drug developers, knowing whether a tool compound is truly selective would improve confidence in early research findings before investing in clinical candidates.

The hypothesis
The rat alpha-CGRP(8-37) fragment retains residual low-affinity binding to CLR/RAMP2 or CLR/RAMP3 complexes (AM1/AM2 receptors) despite being annotated as a CGRP receptor antagonist, due to shared class B GPCR architecture.
Why it’s plausible
Class B GPCR peptide ligands often show cross-reactivity across related receptor complexes. The CGRP receptor uses CLR+RAMP1, while adrenomedullin receptors use CLR+RAMP2 (AM1) and CLR+RAMP3 (AM2). The shared CLR subunit and structural similarity between CGRP and adrenomedullin suggest the truncated CGRP fragment might weakly engage these alternative complexes, particularly given the moderate interface confidence (ipTM=0.644) with CALCR annotation which may reflect ambiguous target assignment.
Why it matters
If true, this would mean the fragment is not as selective as assumed, which matters for interpreting in vivo studies where off-target AM receptor blockade could confound vascular or metabolic phenotypes attributed solely to CGRP receptor antagonism.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.40
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
structureOpenFold3 complex prediction shows ipTM=0.644 and pLDDT=41.6 with CALCR, indicating moderate interface confidence that may reflect non-optimal or ambiguous target pairing rather than high-specificity binding.
[2]
paper
Pharmacological data at CGRP, AM1 and AM2 receptors shows overlapping peptide ligand profiles, suggesting cross-reactivity between related CLR/RAMP complexes is biologically plausible.
doi: 10.1111/bph.14075
[3]
noteThe readme notes that CLR alone is pharmacologically silent and requires RAMP1 for CGRP binding, implying the peptide-receptor interaction is governed by the RAMP partner which varies across receptor subtypes.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does the rat version last longer in the body than the human version would?

If true, researchers would know that rat experiments exaggerate how long the drug lasts in people. For migraine drug developers, this would mean building human-specific versions earlier in the pipeline to avoid surprises in clinical trials.

The hypothesis
The rat-specific Glu35 residue (vs Lys35 in human) reduces proteolytic susceptibility at the C-terminus compared to the human ortholog, altering plasma half-life and making the rat form a misleading pharmacokinetic surrogate for human therapeutic development.
Why it’s plausible
The readme notes a single amino acid difference between rat and human alpha-CGRP at position 35 of the full peptide: Glu in rat, Lys in human. Glutamate is acidic and negatively charged, while lysine is basic and positively charged. This charge reversal at the C-terminal region could affect susceptibility to carboxypeptidases, trypsin-like proteases, or charge-mediated renal clearance. If the rat form is more proteolytically stable, efficacy and duration data from rat models would overestimate human peptide performance.
Why it matters
For therapeutic development, assuming rat pharmacokinetics translate to humans could lead to underdosing or unexpected rapid clearance in clinical settings. Knowing whether the single residue change materially alters stability would improve cross-species translation.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.50
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceThe stored sequence ends with ...VPTNVGSEAF, where the C-terminal region includes Glu at position 28 of the fragment (position 35 of full alpha-CGRP), which the readme identifies as rat-specific (human has Lys).
[2]
noteThe readme explicitly calls out the rat vs human difference at position 35 (Glu vs Lys), flagging the stored sequence as specifically the rat form.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.6442910432815552 openfold3-mlx
ranking score 0.7807592153549194 openfold3-mlx
structural qualityopenfold3
0
metricvaluenote
gpde0.950global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.262fraction disordered
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.644interface quality
3-letter notation
Val-Thr-His-Arg-Leu-Ala-Gly-Leu-Leu-Ser-Arg-Ser-Gly-Gly-Val-Val-Lys-Asp-Asn-Phe-Val-Pro-Thr-Asn-Val-Gly-Ser-Glu-Ala-Phe
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weightsaedd8f3eb814e392…
hardwareapple_m4_base_16gb
mlx version0.31.1
python3.14.3
random seed42
msa strategycolabfold
diffusion samples1
runtime445s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
python3 openfold3/run_openfold.py predict --query_json {query.json} --runner_yaml examples/example_runner_yamls/mlx_runner.yml --output_dir {output_dir} --num_diffusion_samples 1
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Migraine-receptor blocker (alpha-CGRP 8-37, rat fragment) (pep-10683, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10683
@peptide{pep10683,
  sequence = {VTHRLAGLLSRSGGVVKDNFVPTNVGSEAF},
  target   = {calcr},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 8 papers
[2] supporting
[3]
Calcitonin and calcitonin receptors: bone and beyond
Pondel, M. International Journal of Experimental Pathology 2000
supporting
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use