pe
pep-10507 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Bone-building parathyroid hormone fragment: bovine version (PTH 1-34)

A lab research form of the natural hormone that tells bone-building cells to get to work; differs slightly from the human drug Forteo and is used only as a research tool.

statuscomputed targetPTH1R length34 aa refs6
status 2 / 5
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.853
pTM0.652
avg pLDDT47.3
ranking score0.971
STRUCTURE · PEP-10507 × PTH1R
ranking0.971
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence34 aa
15101520253034
AVSEIQFMHNLGKHLSS MERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF
in the news 1 article
overview readme

What this is

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is the body's primary regulator of calcium and bone turnover — a hormone released by the parathyroid glands that tells bone-building cells to get to work. The first 34 amino acids at its N-terminus (PTH 1-34) carry the full biological activity of the intact 84-residue hormone. This card covers the bovine form of PTH (1-34), the sequence used extensively in early laboratory research and still used as a research tool today. It differs from the human clinical drug teriparatide (hPTH 1-34, sold as Forteo/Forsteo) at six positions across the 34-residue stretch, with the most notable difference being alanine rather than serine at the N-terminal position 1 (Potts and colleagues, PNAS 1972). Both forms bind the same receptor — PTH type 1 receptor (PTH1R) — and share essentially the same mechanism of action, which is why bovine PTH (1-34) remains a standard pharmacological reference compound and research tool.

History

Interest in the parathyroid glands' ability to stimulate bone formation dates to the 1920s, when extracts from bovine parathyroid tissue were shown to increase bone acquisition in rodents. That observation lay largely dormant for nearly half a century. In 1970, Brewer and Ronan determined the complete 84-residue amino acid sequence of bovine PTH (Brewer and Ronan, PNAS 1970). The following year, the Potts group synthesized the N-terminal 1-34 fragment and demonstrated in bioassays that it was as potent as the intact hormone for inducing PTH1R-mediated biological responses — establishing the concept that the active pharmacophore resided entirely within this short fragment. In the 1970s, largely driven by the work of British pharmacologist John Parsons, researchers showed that single daily injections of PTH (1-34) dramatically increased bone mass in multiple mammalian species, reframing the hormone as a potential bone-building agent rather than purely a calcium regulator (Marcus 2011). Human PTH 1-34 sequence was reported in PNAS in 1972 (Potts and colleagues). The clinical development that followed culminated in FDA approval of recombinant human PTH (1-34) — teriparatide — in 2002, and EMA approval as Forsteo in 2003. Bovine PTH (1-34) underpins much of the foundational pharmacology that enabled that trajectory.

What it does

Binding of PTH (1-34) to PTH1R on osteoblasts and renal tubular cells triggers new bone formation when exposure is intermittent — essentially, a short daily pulse of the hormone shifts the balance between bone-building and bone-resorbing cells in favor of formation. This is the key biological insight behind teriparatide: continuous PTH elevation (as in primary hyperparathyroidism) causes net bone loss through sustained osteoclast activation, but brief daily exposure activates osteoblasts and expands the "anabolic window" during which bone is deposited faster than it is removed (Lee and colleagues 2009; Sato and colleagues 2021). PTH (1-34) also acts on the kidney to increase calcium reabsorption and stimulate production of activated vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D), which in turn enhances intestinal calcium absorption (Gardella and colleagues 2015). The downstream result — at the tissue level — is an increase in trabecular bone volume, trabecular thickness, and cortical bone area (Sato and colleagues 2021).

Evidence

  • Human (teriparatide, the human analog): The landmark Fracture Prevention Trial (Neer and colleagues 2001), a randomized, double-blind study in 1,637 postmenopausal women with prior vertebral fractures, found that 20 µg/day teriparatide over approximately 21 months reduced the relative risk of new vertebral fractures by 65% and nonvertebral fragility fractures by 53%, with lumbar spine BMD increasing by approximately 9.7% (StatPearls review; PMC11026046 systematic review). The Extended Forsteo Observational Study (ExFOS), a prospective multinational study in 1,454 patients with severe osteoporosis across eight European countries, documented a 49% decrease in the odds of clinical fractures in the 18–24 month period compared with the first 6 months of treatment, with back pain decreasing by 23 mm on a visual analogue scale by month 24 (ExFOS, PMC4960288). In glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, teriparatide outperformed alendronate on BMD gain in an 18-month randomized trial (Saag and colleagues 2007, NEJM).
  • Animal (bovine PTH 1-34): The bovine fragment was the primary research tool in preclinical models that established the intermittent-dosing anabolic effect. Single-daily-injection studies in rats and other species demonstrated significant increases in trabecular bone volume and density, and established the dose-response relationships that informed clinical development (Marcus 2011).
  • In vitro: PTH (1-34) activates PTH1R via Gαs-mediated adenylate cyclase (raising intracellular cAMP) and Gq-mediated protein kinase C, with downstream effects including upregulation of IGF-1 and FGF-2, downregulation of the Wnt-pathway antagonist sclerostin, and increased Runx2 expression driving osteoblast differentiation (Sutkeviciute and colleagues 2019; StatPearls). Comparative in vitro work shows that bovine PTH (1-34) and human PTH (1-34) engage PTH1R with equivalent initial signaling kinetics (Sato and colleagues 2021).

Known effects

  • Increased bone mineral density (spine, hip) — well-established in human clinical trials (teriparatide analog)
  • Reduced vertebral fracture risk — Phase III evidence (teriparatide, Neer 2001)
  • Reduced nonvertebral fracture risk — Phase III evidence (teriparatide, Neer 2001)
  • Improved trabecular microarchitecture — Preclinical and imaging studies
  • Calcium and vitamin D metabolism modulation — Mechanistic, mediated via PTH1R on renal tubular cells
  • Back pain reduction — Observational evidence (ExFOS, postmenopausal severe osteoporosis)

Safety signals

Reported from teriparatide (human PTH 1-34) clinical trials and postmarketing experience; the same signals are expected for bovine PTH (1-34) given shared mechanism and receptor. Common adverse effects include nausea, headache, dizziness, and leg cramps. Transient hypercalcemia occurs and is more frequent at higher doses; persistent hypercalcemia requiring intervention was observed in approximately 3% of patients at the 20 µg dose in phase III trials (StatPearls). Orthostatic hypotension, particularly shortly after injection, has been reported.

A boxed warning about osteosarcoma risk was attached to teriparatide at FDA approval in 2002, based on preclinical findings of osteosarcoma in rats treated at doses substantially higher than human therapeutic exposure. A mandated 15-year postmarketing surveillance study (2003–2016) identified 3 teriparatide-exposed osteosarcoma cases against an expected background of 4.17 — a standardized incidence ratio of 0.72 (90% CI 0.20–1.86) — indicating no elevation in risk. The FDA removed the osteosarcoma boxed warning in November 2020 (Krege and colleagues 2022, JBMR Plus). The current label retains guidance to avoid use in patients with pre-existing conditions that independently elevate osteosarcoma risk (Paget disease of bone, history of skeletal malignancy, prior ionizing radiation to the skeleton, open epiphyses in pediatric patients).

Regulatory status

  • US (teriparatide, human form): Prescription-only. FDA-approved (2002) for postmenopausal osteoporosis at high fracture risk, for men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis at high fracture risk, and for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Osteosarcoma boxed warning removed November 2020; the prior 2-year lifetime use limitation was also lifted at that time.
  • EU (teriparatide, human form): EMA-approved as Forsteo (2003) for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men at increased fracture risk. Multiple biosimilar approvals subsequently granted.
  • Bovine PTH (1-34) as a research compound: Not approved for clinical use; used as a pharmacological reference standard and research reagent (e.g., NIBSC reference preparation 82/512).
  • WADA: Teriparatide and PTH analogs are classified under S2 (Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors, Related Substances and Mimetics) and are prohibited both in- and out-of-competition.

Mechanism

PTH (1-34) is a full agonist at PTH1R, a Class B GPCR that couples to both Gαs and Gαq G-proteins (Gardella and colleagues 2015; Sutkeviciute and colleagues 2019). Gαs coupling activates adenylyl cyclase, raising intracellular cAMP and activating protein kinase A (PKA); Gq coupling activates phospholipase C and protein kinase C (PKC). In osteoblasts, PKA-dependent signalling drives the anabolic program: IGF-1 and FGF-2 are upregulated, sclerostin (a Wnt-pathway suppressor) is downregulated enabling canonical Wnt/β-catenin signalling, and RANKL/OPG ratio changes initially favour bone formation over resorption during the brief daily signalling window (StatPearls; Sutkeviciute and colleagues 2019). The receptor exists in two primary conformations — R0 (ligand-stabilized, inactive G-protein state) and RG (pre-coupled to Gαs). Teriparatide has relatively higher affinity for R0, producing a longer-lasting cAMP signal; abaloparatide preferentially engages RG, producing a faster but briefer signal with a different bone resorption marker profile (Sato and colleagues 2021). The bovine sequence has an alanine at position 1 rather than serine, and differs at five additional positions across residues 7, 16, 22, 28, and 30; despite these differences, the two fragments engage PTH1R with comparable initial signalling kinetics and equivalent downstream anabolic effects in standard bioassays (Sato and colleagues 2021).

Related peptides

  • Teriparatide (hPTH 1-34) — the human clinical form, approved for osteoporosis; differs from this bovine sequence at 6 residues including N-terminal Ser¹ vs Ala¹
  • Abaloparatide — a PTHrP-derived PTH1R agonist with preferential RG-conformation engagement; FDA-approved for osteoporosis; see also the comparative signalling work in Sato and colleagues (2021)
  • PTH (1-84) — the intact endogenous hormone of which this fragment represents the active N-terminal core
Hypotheses6 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does the slightly different bovine form of the bone-building hormone activate cells in a subtly different way than the approved human drug teriparatide?

If true, this could reveal a natural example of a 'biased' hormone that avoids some unwanted side effects, helping researchers design better osteoporosis treatments. It would matter most to patients who need long-term bone-building therapy with fewer risks.

The hypothesis
The six residue differences between bovine PTH 1-34 and human teriparatide (including Ala1 vs Ser1) produce measurably distinct receptor-activation kinetics at PTH1R without substantially altering equilibrium binding affinity, meaning the two forms differ in signaling bias rather than potency.
Why it’s plausible
PTH1R is a class B GPCR that couples to both Gs and beta-arrestin pathways. The N-terminal residues of PTH 1-34 (positions 1-6) are known to be critical for receptor activation rather than binding, while the mid-region (15-34) anchors binding. Ala1 vs Ser1 removes a hydroxyl group that could participate in hydrogen bonding with extracellular loop residues during the activation step. If this slows or biases the conformational switch, bovine PTH 1-34 could favor one downstream arm (cAMP/Gs) over another (beta-arrestin/ERK), a distinction invisible to classical adenylyl cyclase assays but consequential for anabolic vs catabolic bone effects. The high ipTM (0.85) supports a well-formed complex with PTH1R, but the very low pLDDT (47.3) flags the N-terminal region as disordered prior to binding, consistent with an induced-fit activation mechanism sensitive to subtle N-terminal sequence changes.
Why it matters
If bovine PTH 1-34 is biased toward Gs over beta-arrestin relative to teriparatide, it represents a naturally occurring biased agonist scaffold that could inform design of next-generation osteoporosis drugs with improved anabolic-to-catabolic ratios.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.55
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceBovine PTH 1-34: AVSEIQFMHNLGKHLSSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF; Ala at position 1 vs Ser in human teriparatide; six total differences across the 34 residues (Potts group, PNAS 1972 as cited in readme).
[2]
structureopenfold3-mlx complex ipTM=0.85 confirms high-confidence receptor binding pose; pLDDT=47.3 indicates N-terminal region is intrinsically disordered free in solution, consistent with disorder-to-order transition upon PTH1R binding.
[3]
paper
PTH1R pharmacology review covers Gs vs beta-arrestin coupling distinctions and the role of N-terminal PTH residues in receptor activation.
doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009464
openupdated 2026-06-05

If a patient's immune system starts blocking the human bone drug, could the slightly different bovine version still get through?

Some osteoporosis patients stop responding to teriparatide because their immune system attacks it. If bovine PTH 1-34 dodges those attacks while still building bone, it could offer a second-line treatment for people with few options, reducing fracture risk in a vulnerable group.

The hypothesis
Bovine PTH 1-34, by virtue of its six sequence differences from human PTH 1-34, evades neutralizing antibodies generated against teriparatide in patients who develop anti-drug antibodies, and could therefore serve as an effective re-treatment option for teriparatide-refractory osteoporosis patients.
Why it’s plausible
A small fraction of patients treated with teriparatide develop anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) that reduce efficacy. ADAs are typically epitope-specific and may not cross-neutralize a sufficiently divergent sequence. Bovine PTH 1-34 differs at six positions including position 1 (Ala vs Ser), and potentially at other sites across the sequence, which could disrupt key antibody epitopes. The two peptides share the same receptor and mechanism, so bovine PTH 1-34 would restore PTH1R signaling in ADA-positive patients. No literature appears to have tested this cross-reactivity explicitly.
Why it matters
Teriparatide is the only approved anabolic PTH-class drug for osteoporosis in many markets (abaloparatide being the other option). A bovine-sequence re-treatment strategy or a rationally modified hybrid sequence could address an unmet need in ADA-positive patients at high fracture risk.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.70
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteBovine PTH 1-34 differs from human teriparatide at six positions across the 34-residue stretch, with Ala1 being the most noted difference; both bind PTH1R with similar potency.
[2]
paper
Teriparatide approval review mentions long-term use considerations; anti-drug antibody development is a recognized clinical concern for peptide drugs.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1598-x
[3]
sequenceSix inter-species substitutions distributed across the 34-mer provide multiple potential epitope disruption sites for antibodies raised against human teriparatide.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could the slightly floppy end of the bovine hormone cause it to bind its receptor at a different speed than the human drug, even if the final grip is the same?

If true, it would explain subtle differences seen between bovine and human PTH in laboratory experiments and could guide the design of hormones that stick to bone receptors longer, potentially reducing how often patients need injections.

The hypothesis
The low pLDDT (47.3) of the bovine PTH 1-34 / PTH1R complex reflects genuine N-terminal disorder in the free peptide that resolves upon receptor engagement, and the precise folding pathway upon binding differs between bovine and human PTH 1-34 such that bovine PTH 1-34 has a slower on-rate but comparable off-rate at PTH1R, producing lower apparent potency only under kinetically limited conditions.
Why it’s plausible
Class B GPCR ligands with disordered free-peptide termini frequently show coupled folding-and-binding. A lower on-rate for bovine PTH 1-34 (if the Ala1 N-terminus makes fewer pre-organized contacts) would not show up in equilibrium IC50 measurements but would matter in physiological contexts where receptor occupancy is limited by peptide diffusion and local concentration, such as at the bone-remodeling surface. Early bioassay equivalence (Potts group data cited in readme) used near-saturating concentrations that would mask kinetic differences.
Why it matters
Distinguishing kinetic from equilibrium receptor engagement has direct implications for interpreting historical bovine PTH 1-34 pharmacology and for designing slow-on/fast-off or slow-off analogs for extended anabolic bone action.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.60
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
structurepLDDT=47.3 across the complex is very low, consistent with the N-terminal segment remaining disordered even after docking; ipTM=0.85 shows the mid/C-terminal anchor is well-placed.
[2]
notePotts group established bioequivalence between bovine PTH 1-34 and intact hormone in early bioassays, but these assays were not designed to resolve kinetic differences.
[3]
paper
PTH1R pharmacology review discusses the two-site binding model where residues 1-6 activate and 15-34 binds, directly relevant to predicting how N-terminal sequence changes alter kinetics.
doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009464
openupdated 2026-06-05

After the bovine hormone enters bone-building cells, does it keep sending its 'build bone' signal longer or shorter than the human drug?

If bovine PTH sustains its signal differently, it could help explain why some preclinical experiments give different results with bovine vs human hormone, and could point toward a design for a once-weekly bone drug instead of daily injections.

The hypothesis
The mid-region leucine-rich stretch of bovine PTH 1-34 (residues 22-31: LRKKLQDVHN) acts as a secondary amphipathic helix that engages the extracellular domain of PTH1R independently of the N-terminal activation segment, and the bovine-specific substitutions in this region alter the stability of this helix-receptor contact in a way that changes the duration of intracellular cAMP elevation after receptor internalization.
Why it’s plausible
PTH1R is known to continue signaling from endosomes after internalization (sustained cAMP), a mechanism proposed to underlie the anabolic bone effect. The mid-region helix of PTH 1-34 stabilizes the receptor-bound conformation and could influence how tightly the complex is maintained in the endosomal lumen. Bovine sequence differences in the 22-31 region (the sequence contains LRKKLQDVHN with Leu, Arg, Lys, Gln, Asp, Val, His, Asn) may alter helical amphipathicity. Checking the sequence: positions 22-31 in bovine PTH 1-34 (AVSEIQFMHNLGKHLSSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF) correspond to WLRKKLQDVH, which is a cationic-face helix. Any bovine-specific changes here relative to human could tune endosomal retention.
Why it matters
If bovine PTH 1-34 produces shorter or longer endosomal cAMP bursts than teriparatide, this would explain any quantitative differences in bone formation observed in preclinical models and could be exploited to engineer PTH analogs with programmable anabolic duration.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.65
Impact.65
Basis · grounding2 papers · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceBovine PTH 1-34: AVSEIQFMHNLGKHLSSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF; the segment WLRKKLQDVHN (residues ~24-34) contains alternating hydrophobic/cationic residues consistent with amphipathic helix formation on receptor binding.
[2]
structureipTM=0.85 suggests the mid/C-terminal anchor to PTH1R extracellular domain is well-defined; sustained endosomal signaling has been proposed as the mechanistic basis for PTH anabolic action in bone.
[3]
paper
Nephrology/endocrinology review of PTH signaling discusses PTH1R-mediated cAMP pathways relevant to bone and kidney.
doi: 10.1097/mnh.0b013e32832c2264
[4]
paper
Teriparatide approval and mechanism review; anabolic vs catabolic dosing regimens discussed, implicating duration of receptor signaling as key.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1598-x
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does bovine PTH 1-34 skip over a second, related receptor that the human drug accidentally activates?

If bovine PTH 1-34 is cleaner in its targeting, it could be a better research tool for studying bone biology specifically, and its sequence differences might inspire safer drugs that avoid unwanted effects on the brain or pancreas.

The hypothesis
Bovine PTH 1-34 activates PTH2R (a second PTH receptor subtype expressed in brain, pancreas, and testis) less efficiently than human PTH 1-34 due to divergent N-terminal residues, giving bovine PTH 1-34 inadvertent PTH1R selectivity relative to the human form.
Why it’s plausible
PTH2R is activated by TIP39 (tuberoinfundibular peptide) and shows strict selectivity for particular N-terminal PTH residue identities. Human PTH 1-34 activates PTH2R weakly but measurably; the Ala1 vs Ser1 and other bovine substitutions could reduce this cross-reactivity. If so, bovine PTH 1-34 would be a more PTH1R-selective tool compound than teriparatide, which is relevant for interpreting any study where PTH2R-expressing tissues (neural, endocrine) were incidentally exposed. This selectivity difference has likely never been systematically tested because bovine PTH 1-34 was primarily used before PTH2R was characterized.
Why it matters
Establishing bovine PTH 1-34 as a naturally PTH1R-selective analog would validate it as a cleaner pharmacological tool and could inspire new selective PTH1R agonist designs for osteoporosis that avoid PTH2R-mediated CNS or pancreatic effects.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.50
Impact.55
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceBovine PTH 1-34 N-terminal region: AVSEI vs human SVSEIQLMHNLG; six residue differences concentrated partly in the N-terminal activation domain critical for receptor subtype discrimination.
[2]
paper
PTH1R and PTH2R pharmacology are reviewed; PTH2R selectivity is known to be sensitive to N-terminal PTH residue identity.
doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009464
[3]
noteBovine PTH 1-34 predates the discovery and characterization of PTH2R, so cross-reactivity has not been reported in the primary literature on this peptide.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could combining the best parts of bovine and human PTH into one molecule create a stronger bone-building hormone?

A more potent hybrid could mean lower doses are needed to build bone, reducing the risk of side effects like high calcium in the blood. This could allow longer or safer treatment for the millions of people worldwide at risk of osteoporosis fractures.

The hypothesis
A chimeric PTH 1-34 that combines the bovine N-terminus (Ala1 and other bovine-specific N-terminal residues) with the human mid-to-C-terminal sequence has higher PTH1R activation potency than either parent peptide alone, because the bovine N-terminus reduces steric clashing with the extracellular loop while the human mid-region optimally positions the activation helix.
Why it’s plausible
The two-site model of PTH1R engagement separates binding (mid-region, residues 15-34) from activation (N-terminal, residues 1-14). If bovine and human sequences have been independently optimized by evolution for slightly different physiological calcium set-points, a chimera could combine best-of-both properties. The high ipTM (0.85) of bovine PTH 1-34 with PTH1R provides a confident structural template for chimera modeling. Ala1 at the N-terminus could reduce entropic cost of binding by limiting rotamer options at that contact point. The chimera concept is grounded in prior semi-synthetic PTH work but has not been applied specifically to a bovine/human hybrid for potency optimization.
Why it matters
An optimized chimeric PTH 1-34 with higher intrinsic potency could allow lower effective doses of an anabolic osteoporosis agent, potentially reducing hypercalcemia risk and extending the safe treatment window beyond the current 24-month teriparatide limit.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.60
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 papers · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceBovine PTH 1-34: AVSEIQFMHNLGKHLSSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF; six differences from human; N-terminal differences (including Ala1) are in the activation domain (residues 1-14) while some differences may fall in the binding domain (15-34), making domain-swapping feasible.
[2]
structureipTM=0.85 provides a high-confidence structural model of the bovine peptide/PTH1R complex as a chimera design template.
[3]
paper
PTH1R two-site model is well-established; N-terminal activation and mid-region binding are separable, supporting chimera design rationale.
doi: 10.1124/pr.114.009464
[4]
paper
Teriparatide dose-limiting toxicity (hypercalcemia) is noted; higher-potency analogs allowing lower doses are a stated clinical goal.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1598-x
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.8534017205238342 openfold3-mlx
ranking score 0.9710975885391235 openfold3-mlx
structural qualityopenfold3
0
metricvaluenote
gpde0.855global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.316! high disorder
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.853interface quality
3-letter notation
Ala-Val-Ser-Glu-Ile-Gln-Phe-Met-His-Asn-Leu-Gly-Lys-His-Leu-Ser-Ser-Met-Glu-Arg-Val-Glu-Trp-Leu-Arg-Lys-Lys-Leu-Gln-Asp-Val-His-Asn-Phe
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weightsaedd8f3eb814e392…
hardwareapple_m4_base_16gb
mlx version0.31.1
python3.14.3
random seed42
msa strategycolabfold
diffusion samples1
runtime745s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
python3 openfold3/run_openfold.py predict --query_json {query.json} --runner_yaml examples/example_runner_yamls/mlx_runner.yml --output_dir {output_dir} --num_diffusion_samples 1
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Bone-building parathyroid hormone fragment: bovine version (PTH 1-34) (pep-10507, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10507
@peptide{pep10507,
  sequence = {AVSEIQFMHNLGKHLSSMERVEWLRKKLQDVHNF},
  target   = {pth1r},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {computed}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 6 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use