pe
pep-10933 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Brain-protective peptide (Cortagen / AEDP)

A lab-made four-amino-acid peptide studied in animals for protecting brain and nerve tissue; sold in Russia as a supplement, not an approved drug anywhere.

statuscomputed targetNEUROPROTECTIVE length4 aa refs1
snapshot preclinical 0% confidence
Class
Synthetic tetrapeptide bioregulator (Khavinson program)
Status
Not approved by FDA, EMA, Health Canada, MHRA, or any equivalent major reference regulator. Marketed in Russia and CIS as a dietary peptide complex; not a registered pharmaceutical.
Best-supported effect
Sciatic nerve regeneration markers and brain function parameters in rodent models (preclinical animal studies, Khavinson group only).
Main caveat
Cortagen-specific preclinical evidence is sparse and concentrated in a single Russian research network with no independent Western replication; human efficacy is not established; cognitive-enhancement claims in healthy adults are not supported by peptide-specific evidence.
status 2 / 5
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.873
pTM0.872
avg pLDDT62.0
ranking score0.916
STRUCTURE · PEP-10933 × NEUROPROTECTIVE
ranking0.916
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence4 aa
14
AEDP
in the news 11 articles
overview readme

Snapshot

Class: Synthetic tetrapeptide bioregulator (Khavinson program)
Evidence tier: Animal-only evidence
Status: Not approved by FDA, EMA, Health Canada, MHRA, or any equivalent major reference regulator; marketed in Russia and CIS as a dietary peptide complex, not as a registered pharmaceutical
Best-supported effect: Sciatic nerve regeneration markers and brain function parameters in rodent models — animal studies from the Khavinson research group only (preclinical)
Main caveat: Cortagen-specific evidence is sparse, concentrated in a single Russian research network, and absent of independent Western replication; human efficacy is not established; cognitive-enhancement claims in healthy adults significantly exceed what the peptide-specific evidence supports


What this is

Cortagen is a synthetic tetrapeptide with the sequence Ala-Glu-Asp-Pro (AEDP), developed within Vladimir Khavinson's bioregulator program at the St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology. It was designed as the chemically defined short-peptide counterpart of Cortexin, an older natural-extract preparation derived from cattle cerebral cortex tissue that the Khavinson group and Russian clinicians used in neurology from the 1980s onward. The design logic — common across the Khavinson bioregulator series — is to identify a putative short-peptide active motif from a larger tissue extract, synthesize it as a single defined molecule, and attribute tissue-specific gene-regulatory effects to that molecule.

Cortagen and Cortexin are related but distinct preparations. Evidence for one does not transfer cleanly to the other, and this distinction is frequently overlooked in community and nootropic contexts. The published preclinical record specific to Cortagen consists of a small number of animal and in vitro studies from the Khavinson group and Russian collaborators; independent Western replication is essentially absent.


Evidence map

Evidence layerGradeWhat it supports
HumanNone identifiedNo controlled human trial data for Cortagen are present in available literature. "small studies in elderly patients with cognitive decline, primarily from Russian institutions," but no individually extractable controlled efficacy results are attached; this description does not meet the threshold for human-tier evidence.
AnimalWeakSciatic nerve regeneration markers in rat models; microarray-detected gene expression changes in mouse heart; brain function parameters in a chronic cerebral ischemia model. All studies trace to the Khavinson group and Russian collaborators. No independent Western replication is identified in available literature.
In vitroWeakShort-peptide effect on interleukin-2 gene expression in splenocytes (one study; Khavinson group; indirect relevance to cortical neuroprotection claims).
ComputationalNone identifiedNo docking, structure prediction, or model scores are identifieds source.
MechanismPlausible — contestedProposed direct DNA interaction by the tetrapeptide to modulate cortical neuron gene expression. Short-peptide gene-regulatory activity is plausible as a class effect, but the specific direct-DNA-interaction mechanism proposed for Cortagen has not been validated by independent biochemical confirmation.

Replication caveat: Substantially all Cortagen-specific preclinical evidence originates from the Khavinson research program and Russian collaborators. Independent Western replication is essentially absent from the published record present in available literature. Confidence in the preclinical findings is limited by this concentration of evidence in a single research network.


Claim check

ClaimVerdictEvidence layerConfidence
Supports nerve regeneration in animal modelsSupported (preclinical)AnimalMedium — Khavinson-group studies only; no independent Western replication
Brain function improvement in chronic ischemia modelsSupported (preclinical)AnimalLow — single study, single research group, no replication; also reports combined cortagen/cortexin, not cortagen alone
Cognitive enhancement or memory improvement in healthy adultsNot establishedNone for this claimHigh — published literature explicitly states claims significantly exceed peptide-specific evidence; no human trial data for healthy adults in source
Cognitive benefit in humans with cognitive declineNot establishedHuman (human-adjacent only)High — source describes uncontrolled Russian small studies; no individually extractable controlled efficacy result; insufficient for established human efficacy
Cortagen and Cortexin are interchangeableContradictedSource narrativeHigh — source directly addresses this as a common misconception; they are related but distinct preparations with different evidence bases
Direct DNA-interaction mechanism is independently validatedWeak / not independently validatedIn vitroMedium — proposed by the Khavinson group; not confirmed by independent biochemical study

Experimental exposure

This section reports exposure used in animal experiments cited in available literature. It does not establish human dosing.

ContextSystemExperimental exposureDurationEndpointLimitation
Animal experimentRat sciatic nerve injury modelCortagen; exact dose not individually extracted in sourceNot individually extracted in sourceNerve regeneration and function restoration markersSingle research group; exact dose not extracted; no independent replication; no human translation established
Animal experimentMouse heart tissue (microarray)Brain cortex tetrapeptide Cortagen; exact dose not individually extractedNot individually extracted in sourceMicroarray gene expression profileEndpoint is gene expression in heart tissue — indirect relevance to brain cortex neuroprotection claims; Khavinson group only
Animal experimentChronic cerebral ischemia model (species not individually extracted in source)Cortagen and/or Cortexin combined per study; exact dose not individually extractedNot individually extracted in sourceBrain function and metabolic disorder markersStudy includes Cortexin alongside Cortagen; individual drug attribution not separately extracted; no human translation established

Preclinical safety signals

SignalSystemNotes
No major toxicity reported in available preclinical studiesRat/mouse (Khavinson-group studies)Limited number and scope; no systematic toxicology program described in source
Pregnancy and reproductive toxicologyNot studiedSource notes no adequate reproductive toxicology data; classified as not recommended in pregnancy
Seizure-threshold effectsNot studiedNeuromodulatory short peptides not adequately studied for seizure-threshold effects per source
CNS malignancy contextTheoretical concern noted in sourceSource notes theoretical concern in active or recent-history CNS malignancy given proposed neuronal gene-expression modulation; not independently studied
Long-term cumulative effectsNot establishedRepeated-course cumulative safety has not been independently studied; neurogenesis-related risk not characterized
Human safety dataNone identifiedNo formal human safety trial data individually extracted in available literature

Regulatory status

Region / bodyStatusNotes
US (FDA)Not approvedNot approved for any indication; not recognized as a dietary supplement ingredient; not on the FDA 503A compounding list; injectable forms available only through research-chemical suppliers not authorized for human use
EU (EMA)Not approvedper available sources; EMA approval not identified in source
UK (MHRA)Not approvedper available sources; not identified as approved
Canada (Health Canada)Not approvedper available sources; not identified as approved
Russia / CISMarketed as dietary peptide complexKhavinson-affiliated oral and sublingual products sold as dietary peptide complexes (e.g., Peptides.ru), not as registered pharmaceuticals; dietary-complex registration is a lower-evidence regulatory category not equivalent to Western prescription-drug approval
WADALikely prohibited for injectable forms — per available sources; current list not independently refreshed in this cardSource states Cortagen is not specifically named on the WADA Prohibited List; Per available sources, that as an unapproved substance the S0 catch-all category likely applies to injectable forms for athletes subject to WADA code

Mechanism

Cortagen is proposed by the Khavinson program to act through direct interaction with DNA in cortical neurons, modulating the expression of genes involved in neuronal survival, synaptic plasticity, and neurotransmitter synthesis. The proposed mechanism includes chromatin remodeling and epigenetic effects that may counteract age-related changes in cortical gene expression. The gene-regulatory effects described in the microarray reference were measured in mouse heart tissue, not brain cortex, which complicates the cortex-specificity rationale.

Short-peptide gene-regulatory activity is plausible as a biological class effect. However, the specific direct-DNA-interaction mechanism attributed to the AEDP tetrapeptide has not been independently validated by biochemical confirmation outside the Khavinson program. Target confidence is rated inferred, not verified. No binding affinity data or defined molecular target for AEDP are present in available literature.


Chemistry

FieldValue
Amino-acid sequenceAla-Glu-Asp-Pro (AEDP)
Length4 amino acids
TopologyLinear
ModificationsNone described in source
Molecular weightNot individually extracted in source
FormulaNot individually extracted in source
CASNot present in source
Sequence confidenceNeeds review — source body consistently identifies Ala-Glu-Asp-Pro (AEDP), but published research overview header uses "AEDG Peptide Complex" (G = glycine rather than P = proline). The AEDP form is the consistently described four-residue sequence throughout published research narrative; the AEDG header label may reflect a source-level artifact. No primary analytical chemistry reference is attached to resolve this discrepancy.

Open questions

  • Human controlled trials: No controlled human efficacy data for Cortagen are present in available literature. Whether animal-model effects — nerve regeneration markers, chronic ischemia brain function parameters — translate to any measurable clinical benefit in humans has not been established.
  • Independent preclinical replication: Substantially all Cortagen preclinical data originate from the Khavinson research group and Russian collaborators. Independent Western laboratories have not replicated the core findings under modern trial-methodology standards. Replication is the primary bottleneck in the evidence base.
  • Mechanism validation: The proposed direct-DNA-interaction mechanism for the AEDP tetrapeptide has not been independently confirmed. Whether any observed effects are mediated by this specific mechanism, by downstream peptide metabolites, or by another pathway is unresolved.
  • Pharmacokinetics: Absorption of the intact short tetrapeptide — particularly oral and sublingual bioavailability — has not been independently characterized for Cortagen. Blood-brain-barrier penetration is assumed by the originating program but has not been confirmed by independent pharmacokinetic study.
  • Cortagen versus Cortexin distinction: Much of the cognitive and neuroprotective context in nootropic communities draws on the broader Cortexin literature. Cleanly attributing effects to the AEDP tetrapeptide specifically, rather than to the natural cortex-extract tradition, has not been adequately established.
  • Long-term safety: Cumulative effects of repeated courses have not been independently studied. Potential effects on neurogenesis-related risk, seizure threshold, and interactions with psychotropic, anticonvulsant, or oncology medications are uncharacterized. The absence of documented major adverse events in limited short-course preclinical studies does not establish safety over repeated use.
  • AEDG vs AEDP sequence: Published research header refers to "AEDG Peptide Complex" while published research body consistently uses "AEDP." Whether AEDG is a separate peptide, a labeling error, or an alternate form requires verification against a primary chemistry source.
Hypotheses2 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does AEDP last longer in brain tissue than similar peptides because its last building block blocks the enzyme that normally destroys it there?

If this is true, it would explain the brain-targeting of the whole Khavinson neuroprotective series and give researchers a simple rule for designing longer-lasting brain peptides, accelerating development of treatments for neurodegenerative diseases where getting drugs to persist in the brain is a critical challenge.

The hypothesis
The Pro residue at position 4 of AEDP renders it resistant to cleavage by brain endopeptidases that require a C-terminal flexible residue for efficient hydrolysis, conferring AEDP greater CNS half-life than the related peptides AEDL (Cartalax) and GEDLE (Bronchogen), and this pharmacokinetic advantage rather than unique receptor selectivity explains its reported brain-versus-cartilage tissue preference.
Why it’s plausible
Among the related Khavinson tetrapeptides, AEDP uniquely terminates in Pro. Prolyl endopeptidase (PEP/PREP), the major brain neuropeptide-cleaving enzyme, has dramatically reduced activity against substrates with Pro at the C-terminal side of the scissile bond. If AEDP is a PEP substrate only slowly cleaved, it would persist longer in the brain interstitium than AEDL (C-terminal Leu, a good PEP substrate). The annotated 'neuroprotective' target and the brain-specific framing of Cortagen vs. Cartalax could be explained entirely by differential CNS proteolytic stability rather than receptor selectivity. The ipTM of 0.87 might reflect AEDP binding within the PEP active site as an inhibitor.
Why it matters
If CNS persistence rather than receptor specificity drives AEDP's neural effects, the pharmacophore for neuroprotection is simply 'any short anionic peptide with C-terminal Pro,' enabling rational design of protease-resistant neuroprotective peptidomimetics.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.60
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceAEDP: Ala-Glu-Asp-Pro; C-terminal Pro is a known inhibitor of prolyl endopeptidase (PREP/PEP), the major CNS neuropeptide-cleaving enzyme; AEDL (Cartalax) has C-terminal Leu, which is efficiently cleaved
[2]
structureopenfold3 ipTM=0.87 (highest among these peptides): if docked model places AEDP in an enzyme active site, the relatively ordered complex is consistent with a protease-inhibitor interaction rather than a receptor agonist interaction
[3]
sourceCross-reactivity with neuropeptide GPCRs is unlikely for small non-canonical peptides; alternative mechanisms including protease inhibition are more parsimonious for sub-5-aa anionic peptides
[4]
paper
Peptide stability in the CNS is limited by endopeptidases; C-terminal residue identity is a major determinant of proteolytic susceptibility
doi: 10.1038/s41392-024-02107-5
openupdated 2026-06-05

If proline is replaced by any other amino acid in AEDP, does it lose its ability to protect brain cells even though the rest of the sequence is unchanged?

If proline is proven essential for AEDP's brain activity, chemists could build a locked version of this shape that is stable and potent, which would accelerate the development of a structurally defined neuroprotective drug for conditions like stroke recovery or early Alzheimer's disease.

The hypothesis
The Pro residue in AEDP enforces a type-II beta-turn that positions Glu2 and Asp3 on the same face of the turn as a constrained anionic patch, and this geometry is both necessary and sufficient for neuroprotective activity, such that replacement of Pro4 with any non-proline residue abolishes brain-model efficacy even when the Glu-Asp pharmacophore is retained.
Why it’s plausible
Pro4 is the only distinguishing structural feature of AEDP relative to AEDL (Pro vs. Leu at position 4). The Pro phi angle constrains the peptide to a type-II beta-turn around Asp3-Pro4. In this turn, Glu2 and Asp3 are presented on the convex face with a specific distance and angle. In AEDL, Leu4 allows greater conformational flexibility, presenting the Glu-Asp core with a different geometry. If the type-II turn geometry of the Glu-Asp presentation is the pharmacophore for the neuroprotective receptor or chromatin target, substituting Pro4 with Ala (flexible) or Leu (type-I turn promoter) would abolish neuroprotection specifically, distinguishing AEDP from all related peptides.
Why it matters
Demonstrating that Pro4 encodes the neuroprotective pharmacophore of AEDP would allow design of a cyclic or peptidomimetic analog that locks the type-II turn permanently, yielding a protease-resistant neuroprotective candidate with defined geometry.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.40
Impact.50
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceAEDP: Ala1-Glu2-Asp3-Pro4; Pro at position 4 of a tetrapeptide enforces type-II beta-turn with characteristic phi/psi angles; this is one of the most well-established short-peptide structural constraints in peptide chemistry
[2]
structureopenfold3 ipTM=0.87: highest among this peptide set, consistent with a well-defined complex geometry dependent on the Pro-enforced turn that AEDL and GEDLE lack
[3]
sourcePeptide backbone geometry and turn propensity are established determinants of both bioactivity and proteolytic stability; Pro-induced turns are among the most studied in medicinal peptide chemistry
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.872575044631958 openfold3-mlx
ranking score 0.9164835810661316 openfold3-mlx
structural qualityopenfold3
0
metricvaluenote
gpde0.410global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.088fraction disordered
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.873interface quality
3-letter notation
Ala-Glu-Asp-Pro
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weights
hardware
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategy
diffusion samples1
runtime78s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-05-03
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Brain-protective peptide (Cortagen / AEDP) (pep-10933, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10933
@peptide{pep10933,
  sequence = {AEDP},
  target   = {neuroprotective},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {computed}
}
related peptides 1 by signal overlap
clinical trials 1 on ct.gov · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials 1
by phase
1no phase
by status
1recruiting
references 1 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use