pe
pep-10931 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Brain Regeneration Peptide (BRP): experimental appetite-suppressing brain peptide

A small naturally occurring brain peptide that suppresses appetite and causes fat-focused weight loss in animal studies; experimental, not yet tested in humans.

statuscomputed targetNEUROPROTECTIVE length17 aa refs1
status 2 / 5
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.671
pTM0.845
avg pLDDT63.9
ranking score0.781
STRUCTURE · PEP-10931 × NEUROPROTECTIVE
ranking0.781
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence17 aa
15101517
MTSSLFQTTSSSSNTLQ
in the news 11 articles
overview readme

Snapshot

Class: Non-incretin POMC-activating endogenous hypothalamic peptide fragment
Evidence tier: Animal-only evidence
Status: Unapproved investigational peptide; no human trials initiated as of April 2026
Best-supported effect: Appetite suppression and fat-selective weight loss in rodent and minipig models (preclinical only)
Main caveat: No human dosing has occurred; the receptor mediating BRP's effect on POMC neurons has not been identified; all efficacy and safety data are from a single preclinical publication by one research group


What this is

BRP (BRINP2-Related Peptide) is a 12-amino-acid peptide with the sequence THRILRRLFNLC, corresponding to residues 386–397 of the human BRINP2 protein (BMP and retinoic acid inducible neural-specific 2). It is cleaved from its 78-kDa secreted precursor by prohormone convertase 1 (PCSK1) at flanking KK and KR recognition sites, and is detectable endogenously in human cerebrospinal fluid at approximately 700 pM to 3 nM — establishing it as a naturally occurring signaling peptide rather than a purely synthetic construct.

BRP was computationally identified by Laetitia Coassolo and colleagues in Katrin Svensson's laboratory at Stanford Medicine, using an AI-driven prohormone-cleavage prediction pipeline ("Peptide Predictor"), and published in Nature in March 2025. In animal studies, it activates pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons in the arcuate hypothalamus through a mechanism that is independent of leptin, the GLP-1 receptor, and the melanocortin 4 receptor — placing it in a pharmacological class distinct from all currently approved anti-obesity drugs. All published pharmacological data are preclinical; no human dosing has been reported.


Evidence map

Evidence layerGradeWhat it supports
HumanNot presentNo human pharmacological administration has occurred; endogenous BRP has been measured in human CSF, establishing biological presence but not therapeutic effect
AnimalModerateAcute food intake reduction (up to 50% within one hour) in lean mice and minipigs; fat-selective weight loss and improved glucose/insulin tolerance in obese mice after 14-day daily dosing; no nausea, muscle loss, or behavioral changes observed
In vitroNone identifiedNo cell assay or binding assay data are identified
ComputationalPresent / discovery-contextIdentified via Peptide Predictor pipeline screening ~2,683 candidate prohormone cleavage products from ~20,000 human protein-coding genes; the computational step supported discovery, not binding or activity validation
MechanismPlausiblePOMC/cAMP-PKA-CREB-FOS cascade characterized in preclinical work; GLP-1R, leptin, and MC4R independence demonstrated; specific upstream GPCR identity unresolved — primary mechanistic gap

All animal evidence originates from a single primary publication (Nature, March 2025) by the Svensson laboratory at Stanford. Independent replication by other groups has not been reported in the available literature as of April 2026. This concentration of evidence in one research group is a key limitation of the current evidence base.


Claim check

ClaimVerdictEvidence layerConfidence
Appetite suppression and food intake reductionSupported (animal)Animal — rodent and minipig acute modelsMedium — single publication; no independent replication reported in source
Fat-selective weight loss without muscle lossSupported (animal)Animal — obese mouse 14-day studyMedium — single publication; 14-day duration only; no human translation established
Anti-obesity effect is GLP-1-independent and MC4R-independentSupported (animal)Animal — mechanistic pharmacology in primary publicationMedium — demonstrated in preclinical models; therapeutic implications unstudied in humans
Improved glucose and insulin toleranceSupported (animal)Animal — obese mouse model, secondary endpointMedium — single publication; secondary to primary weight-loss endpoint
Absence of nausea, GI disturbance, or muscle lossSupported (animal, short-protocol)Animal — preclinical observation window onlyLow — observed in short preclinical studies; cannot be extended to human tolerability; human side-effect profile is entirely unknown
Human efficacy for appetite suppression or weight lossNot establishedHuman — no human dosing data present in sourceHigh confidence in "not established" — no trial initiated as of April 2026
Safety profile comparable to or better than GLP-1 agonists in humansNot establishedHuman — no human data presentHigh confidence in "not established" — no comparative human data exists
"Natural Ozempic" equivalence with semaglutideNot establishedAnimal / mechanisticHigh — published literature explicitly demonstrates mechanism is GLP-1-independent; shared downstream behavioral output does not establish clinical equivalence, comparative efficacy, or comparable safety

Experimental exposure

This section reports exposure used in animal experiments. It does not establish human dosing.

ContextSystemExperimental exposureDurationEndpointLimitation
Animal experimentLean mice, subcutaneous injectionSingle pre-meal injection; dose range not individually extracted from sourceAcute (1-hour measurement)Food intake reduction up to 50% vs vehicleRodent model; human-equivalent dose not established; no dose-response curve individually extracted
Animal experimentLean minipigs, subcutaneous injectionSingle injection; dose not individually extracted from sourceAcuteReduced food intakeSingle publication; no human translation established
Animal experimentObese mice, subcutaneous injectionDaily injections for 14 days; dose not individually extracted from source14 daysFat mass reduction (~3 g vs ~3 g gain in vehicle controls); glucose and insulin tolerance improvementShort duration; obese mouse model only; no chronic exposure data; no human translation established

No approved human formulation, dose, or dosing schedule exists. No dose-response relationship has been established in any species. No human pharmacokinetic data exists.


Preclinical safety signals

SignalSystemNotes
No nausea or food aversion observedMice and minipigs — acute and 14-day studiesFavorable preclinical signal in short studies; does not establish human tolerability
No constipation or digestive changes observedMice — 14-day studyFavorable preclinical signal; short duration
No muscle loss observedObese mice — 14-day studyShort duration; human musculoskeletal effects are unstudied
No movement, water intake, or anxiety-like behavioral changesMice — standard behavioral batteryStandard preclinical battery; duration and species limits apply
Long-term POMC activation effectsNot characterized in any speciesSustained POMC stimulation effects, receptor downregulation, and compensatory pathway activation are unknown
Receptor off-target profileNot assessableThe GPCR that BRP binds has not been identified; systematic off-target profiling is not possible until the receptor is known
Human pharmacokineticsNot establishedHalf-life, clearance, bioavailability, and distribution in humans are entirely unstudied
Reproductive and developmental toxicologyNot establishedNo data in any species

No human safety data of any kind is present in this card. The absence of adverse signals in short preclinical studies is a promising early indicator but does not constitute a human safety statement. Every anti-obesity agent that has reached approval had favorable animal tolerability before clinical trials revealed its full human side-effect profile.


Regulatory status

Region / bodyStatusNotes
US (FDA)Not approved; no IND publicly disclosedPer available sources, no investigational new drug application filed as of April 2026; not a scheduled substance; research-chemical consumer sales exist but are not an authorized human-use channel. per available sources; not independently verified in this card.
EU (EMA)Not authorizedUnapproved investigational peptide; no authorization in any EU member state. per available sources.
UK (MHRA), Canada, Australia, JapanNot authorizedPer available sources, no authorization by any major regulatory authority globally. per available sources.
WADANot specifically listed; S2 coverage plausiblePer available sources, BRP has not been formally listed or ruled on by WADA as of April 2026; WADA S2 category ("Peptide Hormones, Growth Factors, Related Substances and Mimetics") plausibly covers BRP per source, but no formal ruling has been issued. per available sources; not independently refreshed in this card.

No approved therapeutic status identified in the attached source. BRP is an early-stage investigational peptide with no authorized human-use channel in any jurisdiction.


Mechanism

BRP is cleaved from the secreted BRINP2 protein by prohormone convertase 1 (PCSK1), which recognizes KK and KR flanking motifs surrounding residues 386–397 of the 78-kDa precursor. The released 12-residue fragment (THRILRRLFNLC) is detectable endogenously in human cerebrospinal fluid at approximately 700 pM to 3 nM.

In the arcuate hypothalamus, BRP selectively activates POMC neurons. The intracellular signaling cascade downstream of BRP binding, as characterized in the primary Nature publication: receptor activation at an unidentified hypothalamic G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) elevates intracellular cAMP, activating protein kinase A (PKA), which phosphorylates the transcription factor CREB and drives FOS expression, producing neuronal activation. POMC neurons project to both appetite-suppressive and thermogenic/fat-oxidation circuits, which is consistent with the dual preclinical outputs of reduced food intake and fat-selective weight loss.

Mechanistic independence from approved appetite pathways: The published work demonstrates that BRP's anti-obesity effect is independent of leptin signaling, the GLP-1 receptor (the target of semaglutide and tirzepatide), and the melanocortin 4 receptor (the target of setmelanotide). The absence of GI-tract signaling engagement is the proposed mechanistic explanation for the absence of nausea in animal models. These conclusions are from preclinical models; human CNS pharmacology is unstudied.

Primary mechanistic gap: The molecular identity of the GPCR through which BRP acts has not been determined as of the original Nature publication. This gap materially constrains off-target profiling, structure-activity relationship work, and medicinal-chemistry optimization. Target confidence is inferred, not verified.


Chemistry

FieldValue
Amino-acid sequenceTHRILRRLFNLC
Length12 amino acids
TopologyLinear
Parent proteinBRINP2 (BMP and retinoic acid inducible neural-specific 2), human
Parent protein residues386–397
Cleavage enzymeProhormone convertase 1 (PCSK1)
Cleavage recognition sitesFlanking KK and KR motifs
Endogenous CSF concentration~700 pM to ~3 nM (human, per available sources)
ModificationsNone described; natural cleavage product
Molecular weightNot individually extracted from source
FormulaNot individually extracted from source
CASNot present in source
Sequence confidenceVerified (primary source:)

Open questions

  • Receptor identification: The specific GPCR that BRP binds on hypothalamic POMC neurons has not been identified. Until this target is known, systematic off-target profiling, drug-drug interaction assessment, and structure-activity relationship optimization are materially constrained. This is the highest-priority mechanistic gap before human development can be fully designed.
  • Human efficacy translation: No human pharmacological administration has occurred. The transition from rodent and minipig preclinical results to human anti-obesity efficacy is the primary translational barrier, and the point where most preclinical anti-obesity candidates fail.
  • Human pharmacokinetics: Half-life, plasma clearance, bioavailability by subcutaneous and other routes, volume of distribution, and metabolite profile in humans are entirely unstudied. These parameters determine dosing interval, formulation approach, and trial design.
  • Durability of weight loss: Whether BRP-induced weight loss is sustained, plateaus, or rebounds on discontinuation has not been characterized beyond the published 14-day rodent study.
  • Tolerance and receptor desensitization: Whether chronic BRP dosing produces receptor downregulation, tachyphylaxis, or compensatory pathway activation is uncharacterized in any model.
  • Comparative efficacy vs approved agents: No head-to-head comparison with GLP-1 agonists, tirzepatide, or setmelanotide has been conducted in any species. The "natural Ozempic" framing does not reflect comparative data.
  • Independent replication: All published evidence derives from one paper by one research group. Independent laboratory replication of the core animal findings has not been reported in the available literature as of April 2026. This is a key robustness limitation of the current evidence base.
  • Reproductive and developmental safety: No data in any species; a fundamental gap for any eventual human development program.
Hypotheses3 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Could this peptide suppress appetite through a different pathway than Ozempic, so people who respond poorly to Ozempic might still benefit from BRP?

Millions of people on GLP-1 drugs lose less weight than hoped. A drug working through a different brain circuit could be added on or used as an alternative, expanding effective treatment to a much larger group of patients with obesity.

The hypothesis
BRP retains appetite-suppressing efficacy in GLP-1 receptor agonist-resistant or non-responder individuals because it engages a completely orthogonal hypothalamic circuit, making it a viable add-on or rescue therapy for semaglutide partial responders.
Why it’s plausible
Approximately 15-20% of patients on GLP-1R agonists show less than 5% weight loss. The readme explicitly identifies BRP's mechanism as independent of the GLP-1 receptor. If the non-responder phenotype reflects insufficient GLP-1R signaling or downstream desensitization, adding a mechanistically orthogonal POMC activator could provide additive or synergistic appetite suppression without pharmacological redundancy.
Why it matters
Defining BRP as a GLP-1R-independent appetite suppressor positions it for combination therapy trials with semaglutide or tirzepatide, addressing the large clinical unmet need in partial responders who currently have no approved escalation option.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.50
Impact.85
Basis · grounding1 paper · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteBRP's POMC-activating mechanism is explicitly independent of the GLP-1 receptor (and MC4R and leptin receptor), placing it in a distinct pharmacological class.
[2]
paper
GLP-1RA pipeline review confirms continued unmet need in obesity treatment, with response heterogeneity acknowledged as a clinical challenge.
doi: 10.1080/13543784.2025.2472408
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this appetite-suppressing peptide only work if it can cross from the bloodstream into the brain, and if so, does a standard injection actually get it there?

If BRP can barely enter the brain after a standard injection, developers would need to design special delivery methods, such as a nasal spray, to make it clinically useful, potentially saving millions spent on ineffective injection trials.

The hypothesis
BRP suppresses appetite through a mechanism requiring intact blood-brain barrier transport, and any detected peripheral effect on gut motility or gastric emptying is secondary to central POMC activation rather than a direct enteric action.
Why it’s plausible
The readme identifies BRP as active in cerebrospinal fluid at 700 pM to 3 nM, and the POMC neurons it activates are central (arcuate hypothalamus). A related literature snippet (doi:10.1111/bph.13083) describes the importance of establishing BBB penetration and half-life for neuropeptides before attributing central versus peripheral mechanisms. Given BRP's serine-rich, hydrophilic sequence, passive BBB diffusion is unlikely; a saturable transcytosis mechanism or a circumventricular organ route would be required for peripherally injected BRP to reach arcuate POMC neurons.
Why it matters
If BRP's anorectic effect depends on BBB transport, peripheral administration may be far less efficient than direct CNS delivery, and the therapeutic development strategy would need to prioritize intranasal or CNS-targeted formulation over standard injection.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.50
Impact.70
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sourceFor CNS-active neuropeptides, half-life in neuronal cultures and BBB permeability must be established before attributing central versus peripheral mechanism of action.
[2]
noteBRP detectable in human CSF at 700 pM to 3 nM; POMC neurons targeted are in arcuate hypothalamus, a central nucleus with partial circumventricular access.
[3]
sequenceMTSSLFQTTSSSSNTLQ: high serine/threonine content and absence of membrane-anchoring hydrophobic stretches suggest low passive membrane permeability and poor passive BBB penetration.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this peptide reduce body fat specifically, without causing the muscle loss that many weight-loss treatments produce?

A treatment that selectively removes fat while preserving muscle would be far better than current options for people with obesity who need to protect their strength and mobility, especially older adults.

The hypothesis
BRP-mediated POMC activation is selective for fat oxidation over lean-mass catabolism because the downstream melanocortin signaling it triggers preferentially engages MC3R on adipose innervation rather than MC4R on skeletal muscle.
Why it’s plausible
The readme states BRP produces fat-selective weight loss in rodent and minipig models. The POMC neuron outputs most relevant to fat versus lean partitioning diverge at the melanocortin receptor subtype: MC3R signaling is more strongly linked to adipose-specific sympathetic activation and fat mobilization, while MC4R activation drives general metabolic rate and can cause lean-mass loss at high doses. If BRP preferentially amplifies the MC3R branch of POMC output, this fat-selective phenotype would be mechanistically explained and distinguishable from the mixed phenotype of MC4R-biased agonists.
Why it matters
Fat-selective weight loss without muscle loss is a key unmet need; establishing an MC3R-biased downstream mechanism for BRP would make it a useful pharmacological probe and potentially a superior weight-loss agent compared to MC4R agonists that caused lean-mass loss in early trials.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.60
Impact.80
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
noteBRP produces fat-selective weight loss in rodent and minipig preclinical models; mechanism described as independent of MC4R.
[2]
noteBRP acts on POMC neurons; POMC neurons project to both MC3R- and MC4R-expressing downstream targets involved in different aspects of energy partitioning.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.6706521511077881 openfold3-mlx
ranking score 0.7805502414703369 openfold3-mlx
structural qualityopenfold3
0
metricvaluenote
gpde0.479global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.150fraction disordered
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.671interface quality
3-letter notation
Met-Thr-Ser-Ser-Leu-Phe-Gln-Thr-Thr-Ser-Ser-Ser-Ser-Asn-Thr-Leu-Gln
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weights
hardware
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategy
diffusion samples1
runtime86s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-05-03
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Brain Regeneration Peptide (BRP): experimental appetite-suppressing brain peptide (pep-10931, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10931
@peptide{pep10931,
  sequence = {MTSSLFQTTSSSSNTLQ},
  target   = {neuroprotective},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {computed}
}
clinical trials 26 on ct.gov · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials ? 26
with results 4
by phase
1phase 21phase 38no phase
by status
3completed3recruiting4unknown
references 1 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use