pe
pep-10497 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Glucagon tail fragment: lab tool for studying liver calcium (19-29)

An 11-amino-acid piece of the glucagon hormone that blocks certain liver enzymes involved in calcium handling; used only as a lab research tool.

statussynthesized targetGCGR length11 aa refs2
snapshot approved 0% confidence
Class
Peptide hormone (pancreatic alpha-cell counter-regulatory hormone)
Status
FDA-approved prescription drug (GlucaGen, Baqsimi, Gvoke) for emergency treatment of severe hypoglycemia and diagnostic GI imaging. Approved by EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, and TGA for the same emergency indication.
Best-supported effect
Rapid blood glucose elevation in severe hypoglycemia rescue in insulin-treated patients (decades of clinical use, multiple approved formulations); with supporting approved use for smooth-muscle relaxation during diagnostic GI imaging.
Main caveat
Native single-dose glucagon does not produce weight loss. Weight-loss effects attributed to "glucagon" derive from dual and triple receptor agonists (survodutide, retatrutide, mazdutide) — separate molecules. Rescue glucagon also fails when hepatic glycogen stores are depleted.
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.971
pTM0.901
avg pLDDT79.5
ranking score0.831
STRUCTURE · PEP-10497 × GCGR
ranking0.831
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence11 aa
151011
AQDFVQWLMNT
in the news 16 articles
overview readme

What this is

Glucagon (19-29) is the C-terminal eleven-residue fragment (sequence AQDFVQWLMNT) of the full 29-amino-acid glucagon hormone. While full-length glucagon is primarily known as an emergency treatment for severe hypoglycemia, this fragment represents a different pharmacological tool: it has been studied for its ability to inhibit liver ATPase activity and Ca²⁺ transport in hepatic tissue, effects that do not depend on the same N-terminal activation domain through which full-length glucagon stimulates glycogenolysis. Because it retains the C-terminal region of glucagon — the portion most conserved across the glucagon/GLP-1/GIP peptide family — it has also served as a structural reference point in the design of dual and triple receptor agonists. The sequence is identical across human, rat, and porcine glucagon, hence the "(human, rat, porcine)" designation.

What it does

Glucagon (19-29) binds to the glucagon receptor (GCGR), a Class B GPCR expressed on hepatocytes and other tissues, but does so through a binding mode that diverges from the full-length hormone. Rather than triggering the strong cAMP-mediated glycogenolytic response that full-length glucagon produces, the fragment has been associated with inhibitory effects on hepatic ATPase and Ca²⁺ transport. This makes it useful as a biochemical probe: researchers can use it to distinguish the receptor occupancy effects attributable to the C-terminal glucagon domain from those driven by the N-terminal activation domain. In the context of analog design, the C-terminal region of glucagon — which AQDFVQWLMNT represents — is one of the conserved structural elements that structural chemists retain or modify when building GLP-1/glucagon dual agonists, because it contributes to GCGR binding affinity while the GLP-1 N-terminal domain drives receptor activation (Ding and colleagues 2020).

Evidence

  • Human: No human clinical data for glucagon (19-29) as an isolated compound. The fragment has not been evaluated in registered clinical trials.
  • Animal / cell: Hepatic inhibition of ATPase activity and Ca²⁺ transport has been characterized in liver tissue models. The fragment appears in preclinical glucagon analog tables alongside modified sequences designed for dual and triple receptor agonism (Frontiers in Endocrinology 2021).
  • In vitro: The C-terminal glucagon region including AQDFVQWLMNT has been used as a reference sequence in comparative peptide structure–activity relationship work, particularly in studies examining how non-proteinogenic amino acid substitutions affect dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonism (Ding and colleagues 2020).

Mechanism

Full-length glucagon binds GCGR in two stages: the C-terminal helix docks in the receptor's extracellular domain to anchor the peptide, then the N-terminal His-Ser residues insert into the transmembrane bundle to trigger Gαs activation, cAMP production, and downstream PKA-mediated glycogenolysis. Glucagon (19-29) — lacking the N-terminal activation domain — retains the C-terminal docking region but cannot initiate the canonical activation cascade in the same way. The fragment's inhibitory activity on liver ATPase and Ca²⁺ transport reflects a distinct receptor-interaction profile, making it a tool for probing Class B GPCR pharmacology at the GCGR without the confounding signal of full glycogenolytic activation.

The full 29-residue glucagon sequence is HSQGTFTSDYSKYLDSRRAQDFVQWLMNT, where AQDFVQWLMNT occupies positions 19–29. This C-terminal region is also the part most directly relevant to the "third-class agonism" concept in GCGR pharmacology — a binding mode in which receptor occupancy at the extracellular domain produces signaling that differs qualitatively from classical N-terminal-dependent activation.

Related peptides

  • Full-length glucagon — the complete 29-residue hormone from which this fragment is derived; FDA-approved for emergency hypoglycemia rescue
  • Glucagon (1-21) — the complementary N-terminal fragment retaining the activation domain; compare to understand the division of function along the glucagon backbone
  • Oxyntomodulin — an endogenous proglucagon-derived peptide that includes the full glucagon sequence plus an 8-residue C-terminal extension; the C-terminal glucagon region in this fragment overlaps with the oxyntomodulin pharmacophore
Hypotheses4 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this 11-amino-acid piece of glucagon sit in the receptor and block the full hormone, rather than triggering a response itself?

If true, this fragment could be a starting point for drugs that prevent blood-sugar spikes caused by excess glucagon, helping people with type-2 diabetes without the side effects of full receptor shutdown.

The hypothesis
Glucagon (19-29) occupies the extracellular domain of GCGR in a pose that sterically blocks full-length glucagon binding without triggering transmembrane helix rearrangement, making it a partial antagonist rather than a partial agonist at physiological glucagon concentrations.
Why it’s plausible
The ipTM of 0.971 indicates a high-confidence predicted complex with GCGR, yet the fragment lacks the N-terminal histidine (His1) that is the primary trigger for Class B GPCR transmembrane activation. The C-terminal region (roughly residues 19-29 of glucagon) is known to engage the extracellular domain stalk of GCGR, which is sufficient for high-affinity binding but not for full agonism. If the fragment lodges in the ECD without displacing toward the transmembrane core, it would compete with endogenous glucagon and suppress glycogenolysis under conditions of elevated glucagon, a biologically distinct outcome from partial agonism.
Why it matters
Distinguishing antagonism from partial agonism at GCGR is directly relevant to obesity and type-2 diabetes pharmacology, where GCGR inhibition is a therapeutic strategy. A naturally derived fragment that acts as a competitive antagonist would provide a structurally minimal scaffold for next-generation GCGR blockers with better selectivity over GLP-1R.
Plausibility.85
Novelty.45
Impact.70
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
structureboltz-2 complex ipTM=0.971 indicates high-confidence ECD engagement; pLDDT=79.5 suggests moderate local disorder consistent with a flexible ECD-binding pose rather than a locked transmembrane complex
[2]
noteFragment inhibits hepatic ATPase and Ca2+ transport without triggering the cAMP-mediated glycogenolytic response of full-length glucagon, implying receptor occupancy decoupled from canonical activation
[3]
sequenceAQDFVQWLMNT lacks His1 and Ser2, the two residues universally required for Class B GPCR transmembrane activation in the glucagon family
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could this fragment reduce the calcium-driven cell death that damages transplanted livers during surgery, without the blood-sugar side effects of full glucagon?

If true, this could improve outcomes for liver transplant patients by adding a simple, short peptide to organ preservation solutions, protecting the donated liver before and during surgery.

The hypothesis
Glucagon (19-29) suppresses hepatic ischemia-reperfusion Ca2+ overload independently of glycemic effects, because its Ca2+ transport inhibition in hepatocytes operates through a mechanism that does not require elevated blood glucose or cAMP elevation, making it a candidate hepatoprotective agent in liver transplantation settings.
Why it’s plausible
Hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury is driven in part by cytosolic Ca2+ overload during reperfusion, a process distinct from glycemic regulation. The fragment's documented ability to inhibit Ca2+ transport in hepatic tissue, explicitly described as decoupled from the cAMP/glycogenolysis axis, means it could act during reperfusion without causing hyperglycemia, which is a known complication of full glucagon administration in surgical settings. The species conservation of the sequence (identical across human, rat, porcine) further supports that the hepatic Ca2+ effect is an evolutionarily conserved function.
Why it matters
Liver transplantation is limited by ischemia-reperfusion injury, and no peptide-based hepatoprotective agent is currently in clinical use. A short, species-conserved, non-glycemic fragment with documented hepatic Ca2+ modulation would be a novel candidate for ex-vivo organ preservation solutions.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.75
Impact.75
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteInhibitory effects on hepatic ATPase and Ca2+ transport are explicitly distinguished from the N-terminal-dependent cAMP/glycogenolytic response, indicating glycemia-independent hepatic action
[2]
noteSequence is identical across human, rat, and porcine glucagon, suggesting the Ca2+ transport function is evolutionarily conserved and therefore likely to be physiologically relevant rather than incidental
[3]
sequenceAt 11 residues, the fragment is small enough for cost-effective synthesis and inclusion in organ preservation buffer formulations
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this small 11-piece fragment latch onto not just the glucagon receptor but also the GLP-1 receptor, which is the target of Ozempic-class drugs?

If true, this fragment could be the smallest known scaffold capable of engaging both receptors at once, potentially simplifying the design of next-generation weight-loss and diabetes drugs.

The hypothesis
Glucagon (19-29) shows meaningful binding affinity at GLP-1R in addition to GCGR, because the C-terminal region is the most conserved stretch across the glucagon/GLP-1/GIP peptide family and the ECD binding grooves of these receptors share the highest structural homology, making the fragment a dual GCGR/GLP-1R ligand with biased selectivity determined by local ECD sequence differences.
Why it’s plausible
The readme states directly that the C-terminal region of glucagon (which AQDFVQWLMNT represents) is the portion most conserved across glucagon/GLP-1/GIP family, and that it has been used as a structural reference for dual and triple receptor agonist design. GLP-1R ECD shares approximately 40% identity with GCGR ECD in the ligand-binding stalk, and fragments spanning residues 19-29 of glucagon have been shown to retain partial GLP-1R affinity in cross-reactivity studies. If AQDFVQWLMNT binds both receptors with low nanomolar affinity but different functional outcomes, it would be the shortest known dual GCGR/GLP-1R ligand, providing a unique scaffold for incretin biology research.
Why it matters
The shortest dual GCGR/GLP-1R ligand would be a valuable tool compound and a seed sequence for the next generation of co-agonist peptides relevant to obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, where simultaneous modulation of both receptors is therapeutically sought.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.35
Impact.65
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteC-terminal region explicitly described as most conserved across glucagon/GLP-1/GIP family and used as structural reference in dual/triple receptor agonist design
[2]
sequenceAQDFVQWLMNT is 11 residues, making it substantially shorter than all currently known dual GCGR/GLP-1R co-agonists, which are typically 25-40 residues
[3]
structureHigh ipTM=0.971 for GCGR complex suggests the fragment makes ordered, specific contacts; the same contact geometry may be transferable to GLP-1R ECD given family conservation
openupdated 2026-06-05

If we swap one building block in this fragment, could it bind the glucagon receptor more tightly while still not turning it on?

If true, this could rapidly produce a more effective glucagon-blocking drug candidate for type-2 diabetes, using a very simple chemical change to a naturally occurring fragment.

The hypothesis
The high-confidence GCGR binding predicted for glucagon (19-29) is driven primarily by the Q4-W6-L7 triad forming a knob-into-cavity contact with the GCGR extracellular domain stalk, and conservative substitution at positions 5 (V5A or V5I) would increase ECD affinity without restoring agonist activity, producing a higher-potency antagonist scaffold.
Why it’s plausible
Class B GPCR extracellular domains contain hydrophobic grooves that are engaged by C-terminal residues of their cognate peptide ligands. In glucagon, residues corresponding to Q24-V25 of the full peptide (Q4-V5 of this fragment, AQDFVQWLMNT) form part of the amphipathic helix that docks into the GCGR ECD. An ipTM of 0.971 suggests the predicted complex is well-packed, but V5 sits in a position where branched-chain substitution could increase van der Waals contact area. Because the activating residues (N-terminal) are absent, any affinity gain at the ECD level would not translate into agonism, generating a more potent competitive blocker.
Why it matters
Identifying a single position in an 11-residue fragment where affinity can be increased without agonism would provide a minimal design rule for GCGR antagonist optimization, accelerating drug discovery for type-2 diabetes and glucagonoma.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.60
Impact.55
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
structureipTM=0.971 indicates the fragment docks with near-maximal geometric confidence at GCGR, consistent with a well-defined ECD contact surface
[2]
sequenceAQDFVQWLMNT: V at position 5 is a small hydrophobic; the flanking Q4 and W6 bracket it in a way that suggests V5 contacts the base of a hydrophobic groove without being optimally packed
[3]
noteC-terminal region of glucagon is described as conserved across glucagon/GLP-1/GIP family and used as a structural reference for dual/triple receptor agonist design, confirming it carries pharmacologically relevant ECD contacts
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.9714738130569458 boltz-2
ranking score 0.8306590914726257 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde0.512global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Ala-Gln-Asp-Phe-Val-Gln-Trp-Leu-Met-Asn-Thr
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Glucagon tail fragment: lab tool for studying liver calcium (19-29) (pep-10497, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10497
@peptide{pep10497,
  sequence = {AQDFVQWLMNT},
  target   = {gcgr},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 3168 on ct.gov · 238 on EUCTR · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials 3168
with results 683
EUCTR 238
PubMed RCT 972
by phase
1phase 11phase 23phase 45no phase
by status
3completed3recruiting1terminated1withdrawn2unknown
references 2 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use