pe
pep-04424 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Oxytocin (Pitocin): the hormone that drives labor and bonding

A natural brain hormone that triggers labor, helps control bleeding after childbirth, and shapes social bonding; FDA-approved and sold as Pitocin.

statusbioassayed targetOXTR length9 aa scaffoldfollistatin refs8
fda-approved
snapshot approved 0% confidence
Class
Cyclic nonapeptide hormone (posterior-pituitary neuropeptide)
Status
FDA-approved prescription drug (Pitocin / Syntocinon) for labor induction, labor augmentation, and postpartum hemorrhage control. Intranasal use for psychiatric, social, sexual, or behavioral indications is off-label and not FDA-approved.
Best-supported effect
Uterine contraction for labor induction/augmentation and control of postpartum hemorrhage in obstetric care; with mechanistic and animal support for central effects on social cognition, stress, and bonding via the OXTR receptor.
Main caveat
Off-label intranasal use for autism, PTSD, social anxiety, postpartum depression, and sexual function is not FDA-approved; the SOARS-B-pattern autism trial reported a null primary outcome and the broader behavioral literature is mixed and context-dependent.
status 5 / 5 · 2 contributors
prediction metrics boltz-2 2.2.1
ipTM0.952
pTM0.903
avg pLDDT80.9
ranking score0.838
STRUCTURE · PEP-04424 × OXTR
ranking0.838
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 2.2.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence9 aa
159
CYIQNCPLG
in the news 2 articles
overview readme

What this is

Oxytocin is a 9-amino-acid hormone produced in the hypothalamus and released by the posterior pituitary. It plays core roles in childbirth, lactation, and social behavior, and is FDA-approved as Pitocin (and internationally as Syntocinon) for labor induction, labor augmentation, and control of postpartum hemorrhage. The stored sequence CYIQNCPLG is the bare peptide backbone; the active molecule forms a ring through a disulfide bond between Cys1 and Cys6, and the C-terminal glycine carries an amide group rather than a free carboxyl — neither modification is visible in the single-letter sequence. Oxytocin is also on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, reflecting its central role in safe obstetric care worldwide (Viero and colleagues 2010).

Two largely separate clinical contexts dominate the literature: an established obstetric role (IV and IM oxytocin for labor and hemorrhage management) and an off-label, research-driven role (intranasal oxytocin studied for autism spectrum disorder, PTSD, social anxiety, postpartum depression, and other behavioral indications). The drug's approved identity rests on the obstetric use; the popular "love hormone" framing reflects research interest in the second domain, not an approved indication.

History

The functional biology of oxytocin — uterine contraction and milk ejection from posterior-pituitary extracts — was recognized in the early 1900s from animal experiments by Henry Dale and colleagues. The molecular story came a half-century later: Vincent du Vigneaud and colleagues at Cornell University Medical College determined oxytocin's nine-amino-acid sequence and accomplished the first total laboratory synthesis of a polypeptide hormone in 1953. Du Vigneaud received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1955 for this work, which established the template for peptide-hormone chemistry more broadly. Synthetic oxytocin (Pitocin) was subsequently approved by the FDA in 1962 for obstetric use, a role it still fills today.

A second wave of research beginning in the 1970s and 1980s reframed oxytocin as a central nervous system neuromodulator. Animal studies — particularly in voles — established its role in pair bonding, parental behavior, and social recognition (Donaldson and Young 2008). That reframing, amplified by popular-science writing, drove the 2000s–2010s wave of intranasal human studies. The clinical-trial results from that wave have been mixed-to-disappointing, with the large SOARS-B trial for autism reporting a null result on its primary social-withdrawal outcome — a significant gap between the "love hormone" headline and the controlled-trial evidence.

What it does

In the body, oxytocin acts on two broad domains. In the periphery, it drives uterine smooth muscle contraction (the basis for inducing or augmenting labor) and stimulates milk ejection from the mammary glands. In the brain, it modulates emotional and social processing — reducing the amygdala's reactivity to threatening stimuli, influencing bonding and affiliative behavior, and modulating the body's stress response via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Viero and colleagues (2010) catalogued oxytocin's reach across physiological systems including the uterus, mammary glands, cardiovascular system, and numerous central nervous system circuits, underscoring that it is not a simple "one-hormone, one-effect" molecule.

The intranasal route is used in research settings to attempt CNS delivery, hypothesized to work via olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathways. Whether — and how much — intranasal oxytocin actually reaches the brain versus acting peripherally or via vagal afferents is a foundational uncertainty that the field has not resolved.

Evidence

  • Human (obstetric, approved): Extensive. FDA-approved for labor induction, labor augmentation, and postpartum hemorrhage control since 1962. Multiple randomized controlled trials published since 2020 have compared oxytocin with comparators (misoprostol, carbetocin, intermittent versus continuous induction regimens) across obstetric endpoints including hemorrhage volume, blood loss, neonatal morbidity, and troponin release; the obstetric evidence base is one of the largest and most consistent in reproductive medicine.
  • Human (intranasal, off-label, mixed): Active trial program across autism spectrum disorder (ASD), PTSD, social anxiety, postpartum depression, alcohol-use behavior, schizophrenia neurocognition, obesity, and healthy-volunteer social-cognition paradigms. The large SOARS-B randomized controlled trial in ASD found no significant benefit on its primary social-withdrawal outcome in children and adolescents, contradicting positive signals from smaller earlier trials. Results across the broader intranasal literature are described as mixed-to-disappointing; no off-label behavioral or psychiatric indication has reached an approved Phase III outcome after more than two decades of Phase II research.
  • Human (intrathecal, investigational): Small trial set examining intrathecal oxytocin for post-surgical pain and recovery after hip arthroplasty; preliminary findings only.
  • Animal: Comprehensive. Oxytocin biology is one of the most studied neuropeptide systems; animal work spans uterine pharmacology, pair-bonding and social-recognition paradigms, stress and HPA-axis modulation, and sexual behavior (Donaldson and Young 2008).
  • In vitro / mechanistic: Strong. OXTR receptor characterization — a Gq-coupled G-protein-coupled receptor — is well established. Viero and colleagues (2010) reviewed OXTR signaling in uterine, mammary, amygdala, hippocampal, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamic, and brainstem circuits.

Myths and misconceptions

  • "Oxytocin is the 'love hormone' and intranasal spray reliably makes people feel more connected and trusting." Acute intranasal oxytocin studies have documented context-dependent effects on social cognition, but the two-decade literature is mixed and many individual findings have not replicated. Oxytocin can increase in-group trust while simultaneously increasing out-group bias and envy in certain experimental paradigms. It is not a reliable or simple pro-social drug, and the straightforward "love hormone" framing does not survive contact with the controlled-trial literature.
  • "Intranasal oxytocin is an effective treatment for autism spectrum disorder." The SOARS-B trial — the largest and best-powered randomized controlled trial of intranasal oxytocin in ASD — found no significant benefit on its primary social-withdrawal outcome in children and adolescents. Smaller earlier trials reported mixed positive signals that have not replicated at scale. Oxytocin is not an FDA-approved or clinically established treatment for ASD.
  • "Intranasal oxytocin is a safe, non-pharmaceutical wellness supplement." Oxytocin is a prescription peptide hormone. Intranasal use for behavioral applications is off-label use of a compounded prescription medication, not a supplement. High-dose systemic exposure carries documented risks including water intoxication and hyponatremia.
  • "Pitocin during labor is the same as natural oxytocin and has no meaningful risks." IV oxytocin for labor has a well-established safety profile when administered in a monitored obstetric setting, but risks are real: uterine hyperstimulation, fetal distress, and — at prolonged high doses — water intoxication and hyponatremia. This is why IV oxytocin for labor is titrated with continuous fetal and contraction monitoring.

Known effects

  • Labor induction and augmentation — FDA-approved; extensive RCT evidence
  • Postpartum hemorrhage prevention and treatment — FDA-approved; standard of care
  • Milk ejection (lactation) — Well-established endogenous and exogenous pharmacology
  • Acute social-cognition effects in laboratory paradigms — Documented in controlled human studies; highly context-, sex-, dose-, and genotype-dependent
  • ASD social symptoms (intranasal) — Not established; SOARS-B null result; Phase II mixed
  • PTSD, social anxiety, postpartum depression (intranasal) — Emerging / mixed; no approved indication
  • Neuropathic pain and post-surgical recovery (intrathecal) — Investigational; small trials only

Safety signals

  • Uterine hyperstimulation — Documented with IV obstetric use; the reason continuous fetal and contraction monitoring is required during labor induction.
  • Water intoxication, hyponatremia, seizure — Documented with prolonged high-dose IV use; oxytocin has antidiuretic activity at high doses. Obstetric protocols restrict total fluid volume and monitor electrolytes during prolonged infusions.
  • Severe hypertension — Documented interaction when IV oxytocin is combined with vasoconstrictor sympathomimetics, ergot alkaloids, or caudal-block anesthesia; a clinically significant obstetric drug interaction.
  • Hypersensitivity reactions — Including to formulation components such as chlorobutanol preservative; stated in the Pitocin label.
  • Nasal irritation, transient nausea, headache — Reported in intranasal research studies; acute tolerability profile appears mild.
  • Long-term effects of chronic intranasal exposure on endogenous OXTR signaling — Whether chronic exogenous oxytocin downregulates OXTR expression or disrupts endogenous signaling has been raised as a theoretical concern in the research literature but has not been resolved in controlled studies.

Regulatory status

  • US (FDA): Prescription-only. Pitocin (oxytocin injection) approved for labor induction, labor augmentation, and postpartum hemorrhage control. No FDA-approved indication exists for autism, PTSD, social anxiety, postpartum depression, or any other behavioral or psychiatric use. Intranasal oxytocin in the US is obtained through compounding pharmacy prescription or research protocols.
  • EU / UK / Canada / Australia / Japan: Approved as an obstetric medicine across all major Western markets. Intranasal off-label status for behavioral indications is similar to the US across these jurisdictions.
  • WHO: Listed on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for obstetric use.
  • WADA: Not listed on the WADA Prohibited List; not considered a performance-enhancing substance.

Mechanism

Oxytocin acts as an agonist at the oxytocin receptor (OXTR), a Gq-coupled G-protein-coupled receptor. Peripherally, OXTR activation on uterine smooth muscle drives contraction — the pharmacological basis for labor induction and augmentation — and activation on mammary myoepithelial cells drives milk ejection. Centrally, OXTR is distributed across the amygdala, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, hypothalamus, prefrontal cortex, and brainstem. Signaling at these sites modulates amygdala reactivity to threatening stimuli, social-salience processing, HPA-axis stress response, autonomic cardiac tone, and behaviors related to bonding and social cognition (Viero and colleagues 2010).

Intranasal delivery is hypothesized to reach the CNS via olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathways, bypassing the blood-brain barrier that limits IV-administered peptides from entering the brain in meaningful quantities. However, the fraction of intranasal oxytocin that actually reaches brain tissue versus acting peripherally or via vagal afferents remains a foundational unresolved question in the field — one that affects interpretation of every behavioral-trial result. Effects on social cognition are context-, sex-, dose-, and genotype-dependent, not a uniform prosocial signal (Donaldson and Young 2008).

The relationship between oxytocin and the closely related vasopressin system adds further complexity: the two neuropeptides share structural homology (differing at positions 3 and 8), and both can bind each other's receptors with lower affinity, creating cross-talk that complicates simple mechanistic attribution (Möller and colleagues 2007).

Open questions

  • CNS penetration after intranasal administration. Whether, and how much, intranasal oxytocin reaches the brain versus acting peripherally remains unresolved and affects interpretation of every behavioral trial.
  • Autism trial reconciliation. The SOARS-B trial reported a null result on its primary social-withdrawal outcome, contradicting smaller earlier-trial signals. Whether any responder subgroup can be identified — and why earlier trials did not replicate at scale — remains open.
  • Dose-response curves for behavioral endpoints. Whether standard intranasal doses are sub-optimal, optimal, or supra-optimal for different behavioral outcomes is unclear; some evidence suggests an inverted-U dose-response relationship and sex differences.
  • Long-term effects of chronic intranasal exposure. Whether repeated exogenous administration downregulates OXTR expression or disrupts endogenous signaling over time is not characterized in controlled studies.
  • Sex, genotype, and context effects. OXTR polymorphisms, participant sex, social context of administration, and baseline attachment style all appear to modulate response; trials that have not stratified by these factors may have obscured real effects.
  • Postpartum depression and maternal-bonding trials. Most trials in this space are small, and meaningful Phase III evidence is lacking despite promising early signals.

Related peptides

  • Vasopressin — the closest structural relative; shares 7 of 9 residues with oxytocin, differs at positions 3 and 8, and acts primarily at vasopressin V1 and V2 receptors rather than OXTR. The two systems are deeply intertwined in social and stress neurobiology.
  • PT-141 (Bremelanotide) — melanocortin-receptor agonist approved for hypoactive sexual desire disorder; sometimes discussed alongside oxytocin in the context of sexual function, but works through an entirely different receptor system (MC4R rather than OXTR).
Hypotheses6 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does oxytocin, delivered directly to the spinal fluid, reduce chronic nerve pain through a pathway completely separate from opioids, and could its effects stack on top of opioid pain relief?

If this holds, patients with hard-to-treat nerve pain could get real relief from a drug that has no abuse potential and a 60-year safety record. It could also let doctors use lower opioid doses and cut the risk of dependence.

The hypothesis
Intrathecal oxytocin is an effective analgesic for neuropathic pain via spinal OXTR activation, with efficacy mechanistically distinct from and additive to mu-opioid receptor analgesia.
Why it’s plausible
The readme documents that small trials of intrathecal oxytocin for post-surgical pain (hip arthroplasty) have shown preliminary positive signals. Spinal cord dorsal horn neurons express OXTR, and endogenous oxytocinergic projections from the paraventricular nucleus to the spinal cord are a known descending pain-modulation pathway. The intrathecal route bypasses the pharmacokinetic liabilities of IV administration (1-6 min half-life, no CNS penetration) by delivering drug directly to the target tissue. Since OXTR activates Gq (not Gi like opioid receptors), spinal OXTR agonism would operate through a mechanistically orthogonal pathway, predicting additive rather than redundant analgesia when combined with opioids. This is particularly significant given the opioid-sparing imperative in post-surgical pain management.
Why it matters
An opioid-independent spinal analgesia mechanism derived from a peptide with a 60-year safety record and no abuse potential would represent a fundamentally new indication for oxytocin, addressing an unmet need in perioperative pain with a compound already approved and widely manufactured.
Plausibility.81
Novelty.42
Impact.65
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteSmall trial set examining intrathecal oxytocin for post-surgical pain and recovery after hip arthroplasty; preliminary positive findings noted.
[2]
paper
Viero et al. document OXTR expression in brainstem and spinal circuits beyond classical endocrine targets; oxytocin acts on a plethora of peripheral organs and central circuits.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00185.x
[3]
paper
Oxytocin half-life 4-10 min IV; intrathecal delivery avoids systemic pharmacokinetics and enables sustained local receptor engagement at spinal OXTR.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08014-6
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is the short tail at one end of oxytocin responsible for holding the rest of the molecule in exactly the right shape to switch on its target, rather than directly grabbing the target itself?

If the tail turns out to be a shape-holder rather than a direct contact point, chemists could design simpler synthetic copies of oxytocin that adopt the same shape without needing a finicky manufacturing step, potentially making oxytocin-like drugs cheaper and easier to produce.

The hypothesis
The C-terminal glycinamide (Pro8-Gly9-NH2 in the linear sequence CYIQNCPLG) is required for OXTR activation but not for OXTR binding affinity, because it stabilizes the bioactive ring conformation at the receptor interface via an intramolecular hydrogen bond with the Asn5 side chain amide.
Why it’s plausible
The readme notes that the active molecule carries a C-terminal glycine amide (not a free carboxyl) that is invisible in the FASTA sequence. The Leu8 (position 8 in the cyclic numbering) and the C-terminal Gly9-NH2 extend as a tail from the ring. Conformational studies of oxytocin (ref: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)40700-X, conformational studies of oxytocin and its analogs) and the conopeptide literature (10.1042/bj20061480, vasopressin/oxytocin conopeptide with modified position 8) both point to the tail as a conformational modulator of the ring. The amide nitrogen of Gly9-NH2 can donate a hydrogen bond to the Asn5 carbonyl oxygen, stabilizing the bioactive folded conformation that presents Tyr2, Ile3, and Gln4 to OXTR. Free-acid analogs (replacing the amide with COOH) are known to show dramatically reduced potency, but the specific structural basis -- whether this is a binding effect or an activation/conformational effect -- has not been resolved.
Why it matters
Identifying the C-terminal amide as a conformational stabilizer rather than a direct contact residue would rationalize the synthesis requirement for the amidation step and would predict that peptidomimetics mimicking the amide-stabilized ring conformation without requiring enzymatic amidation during synthesis could achieve equivalent OXTR activation.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.60
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 3 computed/notes
[1]
noteThe active molecule forms a ring through Cys1-Cys6 disulfide and the C-terminal glycine carries an amide group, not a free carboxyl; neither modification visible in FASTA sequence.
[2]
sourceListed ref title: conformational studies of oxytocin and its analogs -- directly addresses structure-activity relationships in the cyclic tail region.
[3]
paper
Vasopressin/oxytocin-related conopeptide with gamma-carboxyglutamate at position 8 -- demonstrates that position 8 (Leu in oxytocin, the residue preceding the Gly-amide tail) modifications affect receptor selectivity and activity in the OT/VP scaffold.
doi: 10.1042/bj20061480
[4]
sequenceCYIQNCPLG: Pro at position 7, Leu at position 8 (cyclic numbering), Gly at position 9 forms the amidated tail; Pro7 rigidifies the tail geometry, making the Gly9-NH2 orientation predictable and potentially important for intramolecular contacts.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does oxytocin act on nerve cells in the digestive tract to push food along faster, independently of its better-known effects on the uterus and brain?

If gut-targeted oxytocin works as a motility booster, millions of diabetics and others who live with slow, painful digestion could have a new treatment option with fewer side effects than the drugs currently available.

The hypothesis
Oxytocin activates OXTR expressed in myenteric plexus neurons and intestinal epithelium to accelerate gastric emptying and colonic transit, making it a candidate for treating gastroparesis or chronic constipation independently of its CNS and uterine effects.
Why it’s plausible
The oral bioavailability axis hits cite Ohlsson et al. (Regul Pept. 2006) documenting that oxytocin is expressed throughout the human gastrointestinal tract. OXTR is expressed in enteric neurons and smooth muscle of the GI tract, and peripheral oxytocinergic signaling in the gut is an area Viero et al. explicitly identify as an unexpected biological role worth studying. Gastroparesis affects millions of patients, primarily diabetics, with limited treatment options (metoclopramide with dopaminergic adverse effects; erythromycin with tachyphylaxis). Oxytocin's prokinetic action would occur via a cholinergic-independent mechanism through direct enteric OXTR stimulation. This is mechanistically orthogonal to existing prokinetics, predicting efficacy in patients refractory to current agents.
Why it matters
If peripheral GI OXTR activation drives prokinetic effects at doses below those causing uterine contraction or CNS effects, a GI-restricted oxytocin analog (minimally bioavailable beyond the gut lumen) could be developed as a novel prokinetic with a cleaner adverse effect profile than current options.
Plausibility.72
Novelty.55
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
Cites Ohlsson et al. 2006: oxytocin is expressed throughout the human gastrointestinal tract; Natochin et al. 2018 on oxytocin's role in osmoregulation, indicating broad peripheral distribution.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.565731
[2]
paper
Viero et al. explicitly state oxytocin acts on peripheral organs distinct from classical endocrine targets, playing unexpected roles as a peripheral neuromodulator -- GI tract cited as an example.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00185.x
[3]
noteOxytocin biology is not 'one-hormone, one-effect'; peripheral OXTR circuits beyond uterus and mammary glands are documented.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is oxytocin's rigid, ring-shaped structure the reason it cannot pass through nasal tissue into the brain, and is that why clinical trials of intranasal oxytocin for autism produced mixed results?

If the ring shape is truly the barrier, it would give researchers a clear engineering target: redesigning or packaging the molecule differently to get it into the brain, rather than simply using higher doses of something that might not be getting there at all.

The hypothesis
The failure of intranasal oxytocin to improve social outcomes in the SOARS-B ASD trial is mechanistically explained by oxytocin's inability to reach hypothalamic and amygdala OXTR from intranasal delivery, because the peptide's disulfide-constrained ring structure prevents transcytosis across the olfactory epithelium at concentrations achievable with standard intranasal formulations.
Why it’s plausible
The readme states that whether intranasal oxytocin actually reaches the brain is a foundational unresolved uncertainty. Oxytocin's ring structure (disulfide between Cys1 and Cys6 in CYIQNCPLG) creates a constrained bicyclic geometry with a molecular weight of ~1007 Da and a zwitterionic character that would be unfavorable for passive transcellular transport. The olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathway hypothesized for CNS delivery requires either intercellular or transcellular peptide transport across epithelial barriers. The intact disulfide ring would resist paracellular passage due to size, and the low lipophilicity of the ring structure (polar residues Ile3, Gln4, Asn5) would impede transcellular diffusion. This is mechanistically distinct from the claim that the ring is required for receptor activity -- it may simultaneously be required for activity AND be the structural feature that prevents CNS penetration, creating an inherent pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic conflict for intranasal use.
Why it matters
If the disulfide ring is the structural barrier to CNS penetration, it would explain decades of mixed intranasal trial results through a single mechanism and would direct engineering efforts toward ring-linearized prodrugs or nanoparticle encapsulation rather than dose escalation strategies.
Plausibility.58
Novelty.63
Impact.62
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteSOARS-B null result on primary social-withdrawal outcome; 'whether intranasal oxytocin actually reaches the brain is a foundational uncertainty the field has not resolved.'
[2]
sequenceCYIQNCPLG: Cys1-Cys6 disulfide creates a constrained ring of ~1007 Da with polar residues Ile3, Gln4, Asn5 reducing lipophilicity.
[3]
paper
Oral administration destroys oxytocin by GI proteases; narrow therapeutic window; eliminated from circulation within minutes -- indicative of poor membrane permeability as a general property.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00185.x
openupdated 2026-06-05

If a chemical tag is added to one end of oxytocin, could it last long enough in the bloodstream to be given as a single injection rather than a continuous drip, while still doing its job?

If this works, a single pre-filled injection could replace the IV infusion currently needed to prevent postpartum bleeding, making the treatment usable in remote clinics without electricity or refrigeration, and potentially preventing tens of thousands of childbirth deaths each year.

The hypothesis
N-terminal PEGylation of oxytocin at the Cys1 amine would extend plasma half-life from 4-10 minutes to greater than 2 hours while preserving OXTR binding, because the N-terminus is distal to the receptor-binding face of the cyclic ring.
Why it’s plausible
The delivery/formulation axis hits cite Collins et al. work on stability-enhancing N-terminal PEGylation of oxytocin exploiting differential chemistry. The current half-life of 4-10 min (confirmed in multiple axis hits) forces continuous IV infusion, which is the primary driver of oxytocin's requirement for continuous fetal monitoring in obstetric settings. The bioactive conformation of oxytocin places the ring structure (Cys1-Cys6 disulfide) at the pharmacophoric face; the N-terminus (Cys1 free amine before cyclization) is the attachment point most distal from the Tyr2, Ile3, Gln4 residues that contact OXTR. PEGylation at this position would add hydrodynamic volume to reduce renal clearance and protease exposure without sterically blocking receptor engagement. A subcutaneous PEGylated oxytocin with a 2+ hour half-life could enable IM or SC dosing for postpartum hemorrhage prevention in resource-limited settings without cold chain or IV access.
Why it matters
A long-acting SC oxytocin analog would directly address the WHO Essential Medicine access problem in low-resource obstetric settings where cold chain for Pitocin and IV infrastructure for infusion are unavailable, potentially preventing a substantial fraction of the estimated 70,000 annual deaths from postpartum hemorrhage.
Plausibility.61
Novelty.38
Impact.72
Basis · grounding2 papers · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
Cites Collins et al. on stability-enhancing N-terminal PEGylation of oxytocin.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.565731
[2]
paper
Carbetocin half-life 40 min vs oxytocin 1-6 min; oxytocin requires IV infusion with continuous monitoring due to short half-life.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08014-6
[3]
sourceOXM and OX-SR sustained-release analogs extended IV half-life to 12.1 and 15.9 min; SC formulation reached peak at 30 min -- confirming that half-life extension to clinically useful durations is achievable with formulation modifications.
[4]
noteOxytocin is on WHO Model List of Essential Medicines; IV administration limits access in resource-limited settings.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Should oxytocin's well-established target receptor be listed in its database record, given that the connection is one of the most thoroughly documented in all of pharmacology?

Correcting this blank field would let researchers and tools automatically link oxytocin to its receptor family, enabling proper comparisons with related drugs like vasopressin analogs, and making the record usable for any analysis that relies on receptor data.

The hypothesis
The card lists no annotated molecular target (targets: [null]), but oxytocin's primary pharmacological target is the oxytocin receptor (OXTR), a Gq-coupled GPCR; the missing target annotation is a data-quality error, not scientific ambiguity.
Why it’s plausible
The readme and all axis-hit literature consistently describe OXTR as the Gq-coupled GPCR mediating uterine contraction, milk ejection, and central social behavior. The 'mechanism' axis hits explicitly cite the DRY motif of human OXTR as oxytocin's molecular switch (Favre et al., Biochemistry 2005). The targets field storing [null] is inconsistent with a molecule that has one of the most extensively characterized peptide-receptor pairs in pharmacology, with an FDA-approved indication whose mechanism is fully attributed to OXTR activation.
Why it matters
A null target field means the card cannot be correctly linked to OXTR in pathway databases, receptor-class browsing, or comparative analyses with vasopressin analogs; correcting it is prerequisite for all downstream selectivity and engineering work on this entry.
Plausibility.98
Novelty.05
Impact.42
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
Viero et al. review comprehensively attributes oxytocin pharmacology to OXTR, a Gq-coupled GPCR, in uterine, mammary, amygdala, and brainstem circuits.
doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00185.x
[2]
sourceCites Favre et al. 2005 identifying the DRY motif of human OXTR as the molecular switch activated by oxytocin.
[3]
notereadme explicitly states OXTR receptor characterization as a Gq-coupled GPCR is well established; target field is null.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.9516012072563171 boltz-2
ranking score 0.8375368118286133 boltz-2
3-letter notation
Cys-Tyr-Ile-Gln-Asn-Cys-Pro-Leu-Gly
recipeboltz-2 2.2.1
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 2.2.1
weights
hardwarevast_v100_32gb
mlx version
python
random seed1
msa strategycolabfold_local
runtime
predicted by
predicted at2026-05-22
lineage 1 parent · 1 fork
▶ pep-04424 CYIQNCPLG [this]
pep-10002 prediction alt model @peptidemodel ⚡ 21d ago
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Oxytocin (Pitocin): the hormone that drives labor and bonding (pep-04424, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-04424
@peptide{pep04424,
  sequence = {CYIQNCPLG},
  target   = {oxtr},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {bioassayed}
}
related peptides 3 by signal overlap
clinical trials 1369 on ct.gov · 107 on EUCTR · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials 1369
with results 198
EUCTR 107
PubMed reviews 1412
by phase
1phase 12phase 21phase 31early phase 16no phase
by status
4completed1recruiting5unknown
references 8 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use