pe
pep-00127 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0 · 3HH2

Muscle-growth booster peptide (DF-3)

A short experimental peptide carved from follistatin that blocks myostatin, the body's natural brake on muscle growth, boosting muscle in lab studies. Experimental, not yet an approved drug.

statusreproduced targetGDF-8 length14 aa mass1665.9 Da charge-1 pI5.42 scaffoldfollistatin refs8
myostatinglp1-comboanchor-card
status 3 / 5 · 2 contributors
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.675
pTM0.712
avg pLDDT45.4
ranking score0.754
STRUCTURE · PEP-00127 × GDF-8
ranking0.754
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence14 aa
151014
VNDNTLFKWMIFNG
in the news 3 articles
overview readme

What this is

DF-3 is a short (14 amino acid) experimental peptide that blocks myostatin, the body's own brake on muscle growth. It was carved out of a larger natural protein called follistatin — specifically, the loop within follistatin that grabs onto myostatin to neutralise it. Researchers stripped that loop down to its minimum functional core and found that a 14-residue fragment, capped with an amide on its tail, still inhibits myostatin in cells and increases skeletal muscle weight in mice (Saitoh 2020). The stored sequence VNDNTLFKWMIFNG corresponds to follistatin residues 41–54; the active peptide additionally carries a C-terminal amide (-NH₂) that protects the C-terminus from carboxypeptidases and is essential to the published activity. DF-3 is a research compound — it has not been tested in humans.

History

Myostatin (also called GDF-8) is a TGF-β-family growth factor that acts as a negative regulator of skeletal-muscle mass, making it a long-standing target for muscle-wasting indications. Follistatin, a glycoprotein found in serum and tissues, is one of two endogenous myostatin inhibitors (the other being myostatin's own prodomain) and is known to bind and inhibit several TGF-β family members including myostatin and activin A (Saitoh 2021).

The DF-series peptides were developed by Saitoh and colleagues, who set out to find the shortest fragment of follistatin's N-terminal domain (ND) that retained myostatin-inhibitory activity. Walking the sequence inward from a 19-residue parent (DF-1, follistatin 36–54), they found that the 14-mer (residues 41–54), named DF-3, was the minimum core — shorter peptides lost activity, and an N-terminal acidic stretch present in a longer variant (DF-2) actually reduced potency (Saitoh 2020). DF-3 was published as "the shortest peptidic myostatin inhibitor reported to date" (Saitoh 2021). A follow-up SAR study explored hydrophobic-residue substitutions to improve potency and to replace the oxidation-prone Met50 (Saitoh 2021). Independent work from Takayama and colleagues identified myostatin-inhibitory peptides from a different follistatin sub-domain (FSD1) over the same period (Takayama, Chem Pharm Bull 2020; Takayama, J Med Chem 2021), establishing follistatin's binding loops as a productive scaffold for short myostatin antagonists.

DF-3 is the parent of the DF-series lineage; later analogues on this platform are derived from it.

What it does

In cells, DF-3 blocks the signal that myostatin sends through its receptor, so that the downstream gene programme telling muscle cells to limit growth is dampened. In a luciferase reporter assay in HEK293 cells, DF-3 inhibited myostatin signalling in a dose-dependent way across 0.3–10 μM and was profiled in the same assay against activin A and TGF-β1, with the small-molecule TGF-β type-I-receptor inhibitor SB431542 as a positive control (Saitoh 2020).

In mice, a single intramuscular injection of 20 nmol DF-3 into the tibialis anterior of C57BL6/J animals (40 μL of 0.5 mM peptide in saline with 1% DMSO) increased the weight of the injected muscle compared with albumin control when measured 28 days later (Saitoh 2020). This is the central in-vivo result behind the peptide's classification as a functional myostatin inhibitor.

Mechanism

Follistatin neutralises myostatin by wrapping around the mature growth factor and burying the surfaces it would otherwise use to engage the activin type II receptors. The 41–54 stretch of follistatin sits on the binding face that contacts myostatin's hydrophobic residues, and three residues in particular — Phe47, Ile51 and Phe52 of the follistatin sequence — were identified from earlier X-ray analysis of the myostatin–follistatin complex as the contact hotspots; DF-3 preserves all three (Saitoh 2020). Alanine-scan derivatives of DF-3 (V41A through G54A) were synthesised to map which residues are load-bearing for inhibitory activity, and the 2021 SAR study extended this with hydrophobic substitutions designed to boost potency and to remove the oxidation-susceptible Met50 (Saitoh 2021).

Because follistatin is a broad TGF-β family inhibitor (Saitoh 2021), DF-3's activity profile against activin A and TGF-β1 was characterised in the original report alongside its myostatin activity, rather than being assumed away by design (Saitoh 2020).

Evidence

  • Human: No human trials published.
  • Animal: Single-dose intramuscular injection in C57BL6/J mice increased tibialis anterior weight at 28 days versus albumin control (Saitoh 2020).
  • In vitro: Dose-dependent inhibition of myostatin signalling in a HEK293 luciferase reporter at 0.3–10 μM, with parallel profiling against activin A and TGF-β1 in the same assay (Saitoh 2020); alanine scan and hydrophobic-residue SAR (Saitoh 2021).

Known effects

  • Myostatin inhibition — In vitro (luciferase reporter, HEK293) and preclinical (mouse intramuscular injection).
  • Activity against activin A and TGF-β1 — Profiled alongside myostatin in the original HEK293 reporter assay (Saitoh 2020); selectivity numerics not pinned to a single half-maximal value in the source.
  • Skeletal muscle weight gain — Demonstrated for the parent peptide in a single mouse study (Saitoh 2020); not replicated in independent labs as of the cited literature.

Regulatory status

  • US / EU: Not approved for any indication. No active clinical trials registered for "DF-3" as a myostatin inhibitor.
  • Research use only. DF-3 is a published research compound; it is not a marketed drug, not a compounded product, and not in any current regulatory pathway.

Related peptides

DF-3 is the parent of the DF-series lineage of follistatin-derived myostatin inhibitors. Other peptides discussed in the source literature target the same biology from different scaffolds:

  • Follistatin FSD1-derived myostatin-inhibitory peptides (Takayama, Chem Pharm Bull 2020; Takayama, J Med Chem 2021) — a parallel short-peptide series derived from a different follistatin sub-domain.
  • Myostatin prodomain-derived core peptides — a separate lineage that uses myostatin's own prodomain rather than follistatin as the scaffold; SAR work on this class has been reported to yield derivatives roughly eleven times more potent than the parent (Saitoh 2020).

Open questions

  • DF-3 has been characterised in one mouse study and one SAR follow-up by the same group; no independent replication of the in-vivo muscle-weight gain has been published in the cited literature.
  • Pharmacokinetics (serum half-life, biodistribution, route of administration beyond direct intramuscular injection) are not reported.
  • No single IC50/Ki/EC50 value is pinned to DF-3 in the cited sources; activity is reported as a 0.3–10 μM dose response in a HEK293 reporter.
  • Cross-reactivity with activin A and TGF-β1 has been profiled in one assay only; broader TGF-β family selectivity is not characterised.
  • No disease-model efficacy data (muscular dystrophy, cachexia, sarcopenia) and no human data exist for DF-3 or its direct SAR derivatives.
  • Myostatin inhibition has drawn renewed clinical interest as a way to preserve lean mass during GLP-1-receptor-agonist weight loss (Prado, Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2024); whether short peptidic inhibitors such as DF-3 have a role in that context is unexplored.
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

If this peptide blocks the same brake signal in heart cells that it blocks in muscle cells, could it stop dangerous scar tissue from forming after a heart attack?

If true, this peptide could help heart attack survivors avoid heart failure, the leading cause of hospitalization in older adults. It would give an existing muscle drug a powerful new use.

The hypothesis
DF-3 could reduce cardiac fibrosis after myocardial infarction by inhibiting myostatin in cardiac fibroblasts, because myostatin signaling through Smad2/3 promotes fibroblast activation and collagen deposition, and follistatin overexpression has shown cardioprotective effects in preclinical models.
Why it’s plausible
Myostatin is best known as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle, but TGF-beta family signaling is also central to cardiac fibrosis. Myostatin expression increases in the heart after injury, and myostatin-null mice show reduced fibrosis. Follistatin, the natural myostatin inhibitor from which DF-3 is derived, has demonstrated cardioprotective effects in animal models. DF-3 is a minimal myostatin-binding fragment. If it can access cardiac tissue and inhibit myostatin in fibroblasts, it could limit pathological remodeling after heart attack.
Why it matters
If DF-3 has cardiac antifibrotic activity, it would expand the therapeutic indication from muscle wasting to heart failure, a much larger patient population. The peptide format may also allow better cardiac penetration than antibody approaches.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.50
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
Myostatin inhibition is a promising strategy for muscle atrophic diseases; myostatin is a TGF-beta family growth factor.
doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126892
[2]
noteFollistatin is an endogenous myostatin inhibitor; DF-3 is derived from the follistatin myostatin-binding loop.
[3]
noteMyostatin (GDF-8) is a TGF-beta-family growth factor; TGF-beta signaling is well established in fibrosis across multiple tissues.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Might this mini-peptide block muscle-loss signals without interfering with other important body signals that the full protein disrupts?

If true, patients could build muscle without the risks to bone density, fertility, or immune function that broader inhibitors carry. This matters for long-term treatment of chronic muscle wasting.

The hypothesis
DF-3 has lower affinity for activin A than full-length follistatin because the 14-mer lacks the second activin-binding determinant in follistatin residues 55-72, making DF-3 a more selective myostatin inhibitor than the natural protein.
Why it’s plausible
Follistatin is a broad TGF-beta family inhibitor that binds myostatin, activin A, and other ligands. The N-terminal domain (residues 1-125) contains the primary binding site, but structural studies show that follistatin uses additional contacts beyond the minimal core for activin A. The DF-series truncations (41-54) remove residues 55-72, which include part of the second binding epitope. The literature notes that follistatin inhibits several TGF-beta family members. If the 14-mer retains myostatin inhibition but loses activin A binding, it would represent a selectivity gain over the natural protein.
Why it matters
Selective myostatin inhibition without activin A suppression could reduce off-target effects on bone, reproduction, and immune function, which are concerns with broad TGF-beta inhibition. A selective peptide would be safer for chronic muscle-wasting indications.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.55
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
Myostatin inhibition is a promising strategy for muscle atrophic diseases; follistatin is an endogenous myostatin inhibitor that also binds activin A and other TGF-beta family members.
doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126892
[2]
noteFollistatin binds and inhibits several TGF-beta family members including myostatin and activin A. DF-3 is residues 41-54, truncated from a larger domain.
[3]
sequenceDF-3 sequence ends at residue 54; full follistatin N-terminal domain extends well beyond this, and structural data on follistatin:activin complexes implicate residues past 54 in binding.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could this short peptide block myostatin using just two key building blocks, instead of the large surface its parent protein uses?

If true, scientists could design even smaller, cheaper muscle-building drugs that fit the same hidden pocket. This could help people with muscle-wasting diseases like muscular dystrophy or age-related frailty.

The hypothesis
DF-3 binds myostatin through a cryptic hydrophobic pocket formed by Trp-9 and Phe-6, not the canonical follistatin beta-sheet interface, explaining why the 14-mer retains affinity despite lacking most of the parent domain.
Why it’s plausible
The sequence VNDNTLFKWMIFNG contains two aromatic residues (F6, W9) separated by two residues and a C-terminal hydrophobic tail (MIFNG). In the full follistatin N-terminal domain, myostatin binding involves an extended beta-sheet surface. A 14-mer cannot maintain that full interface, suggesting an alternative binding mode. The W9-F6 pair could form a compact hydrophobic anchor, with the C-terminal amide stabilizing the local fold. The openfold3-mlx complex prediction shows moderate interface confidence (ipTM=0.675) but low overall pLDDT (45.4), consistent with a peptide that binds through a limited, possibly non-canonical interface rather than a structured domain.
Why it matters
If DF-3 uses a non-canonical binding mode, it could be engineered for higher affinity by optimizing the aromatic pair spacing or adding a third aromatic residue, without needing to restore the full follistatin domain. This would enable smaller, more drug-like myostatin inhibitors.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.60
Impact.55
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence VNDNTLFKWMIFNG contains aromatic residues F6 and W9 separated by two residues (KWM), plus C-terminal hydrophobic stretch MIFNG.
[2]
structureopenfold3-mlx/complex ipTM=0.674936830997467, pLDDT=45.4: moderate interface confidence with low overall structure confidence suggests limited but real interface contacts, consistent with a compact binding motif rather than extended surface.
[3]
noteDF-3 is follistatin residues 41-54, a minimal 14-mer derived from a much larger domain; the C-terminal amide is essential for activity, suggesting the C-terminus participates in binding or stabilization.
openupdated 2026-06-05

If researchers linked this tiny muscle builder to a popular weight-loss hormone, could the combined molecule do both jobs at once?

If true, patients would need only one injection instead of two separate drugs. This would lower costs, simplify treatment, and ensure both muscle protection and weight loss happen together.

The hypothesis
Fusion of DF-3 to a GLP-1 analogue via a short flexible linker would create a single bifunctional peptide with independent receptor engagement, because DF-3 is only 14 residues and its myostatin-binding face is on the opposite side from any hypothetical linker attachment point at the N-terminus.
Why it’s plausible
The glp1-combo tag suggests interest in combination therapy. Rather than co-administering two separate drugs, a fusion peptide could improve compliance and pharmacokinetic matching. DF-3 is extremely short (14 aa), so fusing it to GLP-1 (31 aa) or a longer analogue would yield a peptide still within manufacturable range. The N-terminus of DF-3 (Val-1) is distant from the putative binding face centered on F6/W9. A flexible linker (e.g., GGGGS) would allow both domains to engage their targets without steric clash.
Why it matters
If a single bifunctional molecule works, it would simplify manufacturing, dosing, and regulatory approval compared to combination therapy. It could also ensure both activities are present at the same time and place.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.45
Impact.60
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteTag glp1-combo indicates intended combination with GLP-1 receptor agonists.
[2]
sequenceDF-3 is only 14 residues; N-terminus is valine, distant from the central aromatic residues F6 and W9 that likely form the binding epitope.
[3]
structureModerate ipTM (0.675) with the annotated target suggests a defined binding orientation; the N-terminus is likely not at the core interface, making it available for linker attachment.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Might the protective cap on the peptide end do more than block enzymes: could it also help the peptide fold into the right shape?

If true, chemists could design better caps or tougher building blocks at that spot, creating a longer-lasting drug that needs fewer injections. This would make treatment more convenient for patients.

The hypothesis
The C-terminal amide on DF-3 stabilizes a type-I beta-turn at residues 11-14 (MIFN) by capping the carbonyl and preventing C-terminal fraying, and mutation of Asn-12 to D-amino acid or N-methyl would increase proteolytic stability without abolishing activity.
Why it’s plausible
The readme explicitly states the C-terminal amide is essential for published activity and protects against carboxypeptidases. The C-terminal sequence is MIFNG. In short peptides, C-terminal amidation commonly stabilizes local secondary structure by removing the charged carboxylate and allowing hydrogen bonding. Residues 11-14 (MIFN) have propensity for beta-turn formation: Ile at i+1, Phe at i+2. The amide would cap the turn. Asn-12 (position 12 in the 14-mer, or the second residue of MIFN if 1-indexed differently) is a polar residue in a hydrophobic C-terminal stretch; replacing it with a protease-resistant analogue could extend half-life.
Why it matters
If the amide functions primarily as a structural cap rather than a direct binding determinant, then protease-resistant modifications at the C-terminus could improve pharmacokinetics while preserving or even enhancing activity. This would make DF-3 more viable as a drug candidate.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.40
Impact.45
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteThe C-terminal amide (-NH2) protects the C-terminus from carboxypeptidases and is essential to the published activity.
[2]
sequenceC-terminal sequence MIFNG; amidation removes the free carboxylate on Gly-14.
[3]
structureLow pLDDT (45.4) suggests the free peptide is largely unstructured in isolation; amidation could stabilize a local turn that forms only upon target engagement or in protected environments.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table8 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipSAE d0chn 0.742 AF2-Multimer · ColabDesign
interface dG -23.12 kcal/mol PyRosetta
decoy gap rotated 23.12 kcal/mol PyRosetta
hotspot occupancy 11/13
decoy gap hotspot ko F7A 11.47 kcal/mol PyRosetta
off target delta gdf11 2.1 kcal/mol AF2-Multimer
off target delta acva 9.8 kcal/mol AF2-Multimer
ipTM undefined
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde0.745global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.144fraction disordered
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.675interface quality
3-letter notation
Val-Asn-Asp-Asn-Thr-Leu-Phe-Lys-Trp-Met-Ile-Phe-Asn-Gly
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weightsaedd8f3eb814e392…
hardwareapple_m4_base_16gb
mlx version0.31.1
python3.14.3
random seed42
msa strategycolabfold
runtime251s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-14
lineage 1 parent · 1 fork
pep-00127 VNDNTLFKWMIFNG [this]
pep-10002 prediction alt model @peptidemodel ⚡ 21d ago
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Muscle-growth booster peptide (DF-3) (pep-00127, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-00127
@peptide{pep00127,
  sequence = {VNDNTLFKWMIFNG},
  target   = {gdf-8},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {reproduced}
}
clinical trials 6 on ct.gov · checked 2026-05-22
ct.gov trials ? 6
by phase
3phase 13no phase
by status
3completed1not yet recruiting1terminated1unknown
references 7 papers · 1 non-peer
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use