pe
pep-10613 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Gastrin-34 [1-8]: lab tool for studying gut satiety signals

A short fragment of gastrin, a stomach hormone, used in lab research to study how the gut signals fullness and triggers gallbladder contraction. Used only as a lab research tool.

statussynthesized targetCCKAR length7 aa refs4
snapshot sparse 0% confidence
Class
Endogenous gastrin fragment
Status
No approved therapeutic status identified
Main caveat
Source is a catalog entry with sequence notation and one molecular-cloning reference; no bioactivity, animal, or human evidence is attached.
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.952
pTM0.877
avg pLDDT75.6
ranking score0.795
STRUCTURE · PEP-10613 × CCKAR
ranking0.795
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence7 aa
157
LGPQGPP
overview readme

What this is

Gastrin-34 [1-8] is a short peptide corresponding to the first eight residues of "big gastrin" (gastrin-34), the 34-amino-acid form of the gastrin hormone produced by G-cells in the stomach and duodenum. The stored sequence LGPQGPP represents positions 2–8 of the full gastrin-34 chain; position 1 is a pyroglutamic acid (pGlu, a cyclized form of glutamic acid) that cannot be encoded as a standard single-letter amino acid. This fragment spans the proline-rich N-terminal arm that is unique to gastrin-34 and absent from the shorter gastrin-17, making it useful as an immunological and structural research tool for studying gastrin processing and for raising antisera that can distinguish the two major forms.

History

Gastrin was identified in the early twentieth century as the hormone driving gastric acid secretion, but its multiple molecular forms were not resolved until decades later. The larger circulating form, gastrin-34 ("big gastrin"), was isolated alongside the well-known gastrin-17 ("little gastrin"). The complete molecular basis of the human gastrin precursor was established in 1983, when Boel and colleagues cloned human gastrin cDNA from a gastrinoma library and deduced the full 101-amino-acid preprogastrin sequence, showing that both G34 and G17 are derived from the same gene with their boundaries defined by pairs of basic amino acid residues — and that an internal sequence duplication within the gene suggests gastrin evolved from an ancient ancestral peptide related to cholecystokinin (Boel and colleagues, PNAS 1983). The N-terminal extension of G34 — the region encompassing this [1-8] fragment — was subsequently exploited to develop N-terminus-directed antisera capable of distinguishing G34 from G17 in antral tissue and plasma by radioimmunoassay, enabling more precise studies of gastrin secretion and metabolism.

What it does

Gastrin-34 [1-8] lacks the C-terminal receptor-activating pharmacophore present in all biologically active gastrin and CCK peptides. That pharmacophore — the amidated C-terminal pentapeptide (Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH₂) shared by every active gastrin and CCK form — is the minimal sequence required to activate cholecystokinin receptors; it is not present in this fragment (Zeng and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020; Miller and colleagues, Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2008). Studies of the closely related N-terminal 1–17 tryptic fragment of big gastrin, which includes the [1-8] region, confirmed that it has no effect on basal gastric acid output or gastrin-17-evoked acid secretion when infused in human volunteers at a range of doses (Gastroenterology 1984). The primary use of the [1-8] fragment is therefore as a biochemical and immunological reference peptide: its sequence is selectively recognized by N-terminus-directed antibodies that discriminate G34 from G17, and the N-terminal region of G34 is where trypsin-like proteases cleave during post-translational processing and metabolic turnover.

Evidence

  • Human: No direct human pharmacology data exist for the isolated [1-8] fragment. The N-terminal 1–17 tryptic fragment of big gastrin (which includes this sequence) was infused in human volunteers and showed rapid plasma clearance and no measurable effect on gastric acid secretion (Gastroenterology 1984).
  • In vitro: N-terminal G34-specific antisera with antigenic determinants within the 1–6 and 1–12 regions have been characterized and used to quantify G34-derived peptides in antral tissue extracts and plasma by radioimmunoassay. Concentrations of the N-terminal tryptic fragment in human antral mucosa were found to be broadly similar to those of gastrin-17 in the same extracts. No receptor-binding or cell-signaling data have been reported for the isolated [1-8] peptide.

Mechanism

Full-length gastrin-34 activates the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R, also called the gastrin receptor or CCK-B receptor), a class A G-protein-coupled receptor expressed on gastric parietal cells and enterochromaffin-like cells that drives acid secretion and histamine release. The essential binding pharmacophore involves the C-terminal tetrapeptide amide shared by all active gastrins; the N-terminal arm of G34 — which includes the [1-8] segment — contributes to circulating half-life and metabolic processing but is not part of the receptor-binding interface (Miller and colleagues, Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2008; Zeng and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020). The card's CCK1R (CCKA) target reflects the broader gastrin–CCK receptor family context. In intact gastrin physiology, CCK1R (expressed on gallbladder smooth muscle and vagal afferents) is the primary receptor for sulfated CCK peptides, mediating gallbladder contraction and satiety signalling, while gastrin's own dominant receptor is CCK2R; gastrin peptides bind CCK1R with roughly 500–10,000-fold lower affinity than sulfated CCK (Miller and colleagues, Pharmacology & Therapeutics 2008). The [1-8] fragment, lacking the C-terminal pharmacophore entirely, has no agonist activity at either receptor subtype. Its generation in vivo results from trypsin-like protease cleavage at the Lys-Lys dibasic motif in the G34 precursor, a processing step delineated by the molecular cloning of preprogastrin (Boel and colleagues, PNAS 1983).

Open questions

  • No specific binding partner or receptor has been identified for N-terminal gastrin processing fragments including this peptide.
  • Whether the G34-specific N-terminal region plays any structural role in precursor folding or secretory granule packaging has not been investigated.
  • The functional significance of gastrin-34 N-terminal immunoreactivity detected in brain tissue by N-terminus-specific antibodies remains unexplained.

Related peptides

  • [Gastrin-34 [1-9] peptide](/card/pep-10614) — the one-residue C-terminal extension of this fragment, covering the same unique G34 N-terminal arm.
  • Gastrin-34 peptide — the full 34-residue form, which includes this fragment at its N-terminus and carries the complete C-terminal pharmacophore.
  • Minigastrin I — a C-terminal fragment of gastrin-17 that retains the full receptor-binding pharmacophore; studied as a scaffold for CCK2R-targeted radiotracers.
Hypotheses4 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Was the CCKAR receptor target actually tested for this short fragment, or just assumed based on the larger molecule it comes from?

If the annotation is unverified, researchers using this fragment to study CCK receptors could be drawing conclusions from a tool that has no real receptor activity, potentially explaining inconsistent results across labs working on gastrin biology.

The hypothesis
The annotated CCKAR target is a misattribution inherited from the parent gastrin-34 molecule: LGPQGPP cannot bind CCKAR in a pharmacologically meaningful way because it is 6 residues shorter than the minimal CCK/gastrin fragment known to retain any CCKAR affinity, and the high ipTM (0.952) reflects a modeling artefact where the short proline-rich peptide wedges into a hydrophobic groove on the receptor surface without engaging the canonical binding mechanism.
Why it’s plausible
The shortest CCK-derived peptides with documented CCKAR affinity are the C-terminal tetrapeptides containing Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH2. LGPQGPP contains none of these residues and ends in Pro, which is conformationally rigid and poorly suited for C-terminal amidation mimicry. A Pro C-terminus in a docked pose would orient the carbonyl away from canonical interactions.
Why it matters
If the CCKAR annotation is inherited rather than experimentally validated for this specific fragment, the scientific literature on gastrin N-terminal fragment pharmacology contains an unchecked assumption that could propagate into database annotations and future drug design efforts targeting CCKAR with Pro-rich peptides.
Plausibility.85
Novelty.50
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceLGPQGPP ends in Pro (C-terminus). Pro at C-terminus is conformationally constrained and atypical for receptor agonist peptides; the canonical CCKAR pharmacophore is -WMDF-NH2.
[2]
structureipTM=0.9517 is high but mechanistically implausible given the absent pharmacophore; likely reflects non-specific scoring.
[3]
paper
CCKAR pharmacology review documents strict C-terminal pharmacophore requirements for CCK/gastrin peptide binding, inconsistent with a Pro-terminal fragment having genuine affinity.
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.05.001
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is this 7-residue fragment more resistant to being broken down by gut enzymes than the 8- and 9-residue versions, despite being shorter?

If the shortest fragment is the most stable, it is likely the one that actually accumulates in the stomach and intestine during normal physiology, meaning it is the most relevant target for understanding the biological roles of gastrin-34 processing fragments.

The hypothesis
The terminal double-Pro (PP) of LGPQGPP confers resistance to carboxypeptidase digestion that is greater than that of the 8- and 9-residue analogs (which end in His and Leu respectively), making the 7-mer the most metabolically stable of the three N-terminal gastrin-34 fragments in the gastric environment despite being the shortest.
Why it’s plausible
Carboxypeptidases are strongly inhibited by C-terminal Pro residues: the bulky pyrrolidine ring sterically blocks the active site, and this effect is additive for consecutive Pro residues. LGPQGPP ends in -PP, whereas LGPQGPPH ends in His and LGPQGPPHL ends in Leu, both of which are good carboxypeptidase substrates. The 7-mer may therefore be the kinetically most stable fragment against exopeptidase digestion.
Why it matters
If LGPQGPP is the most metabolically stable of the three fragments, it is also the most likely to accumulate in vivo and to have physiological effects, suggesting current focus on the 8- and 9-mer as research tools may be misplaced if the goal is to study endogenously relevant gastrin N-terminal fragments.
Plausibility.75
Novelty.50
Impact.55
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceLGPQGPP C-terminus: -PP (two consecutive Pro). LGPQGPPH C-terminus: -PH (His, good carboxypeptidase substrate). LGPQGPPHL C-terminus: -HL (Leu, classical carboxypeptidase substrate).
[2]
noteProline-rich N-terminal arm unique to gastrin-34 is a defined research focus; metabolic stability of the fragment series has not been comparatively analyzed in available literature.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is this 7-residue fragment the minimum length needed to display the special shape that makes big gastrin immunologically unique?

Knowing the minimum structural unit for big gastrin recognition could lead to smaller, cheaper, and more specific diagnostic reagents for distinguishing gastrin forms in patient blood, improving accuracy of tests for stomach acid disorders.

The hypothesis
The 7-residue sequence LGPQGPP forms a minimal complete polyproline-II helix turn, as it contains exactly the number of residues required for one full PPII helical repeat (3.0 residues per turn, approximately 2.3 turns for 7 residues), making it the shortest gastrin-34 N-terminal fragment capable of presenting a continuous PPII epitope surface rather than a partial turn.
Why it’s plausible
PPII helices require a minimum of 3-4 residues to initiate and display characteristic features. Seven residues with 3 Pro and intervening residues compatible with PPII phi/psi angles (LGPQGPP: Pro at positions 3, 6, 7) could complete approximately 2 full helical turns. This contrasts with the 8- and 9-residue fragments that extend beyond one complete structural unit. The 7-mer may therefore represent a structurally minimal, self-consistent immunogen.
Why it matters
If LGPQGPP is the minimal PPII-displaying fragment, it defines the smallest possible probe for raising PPII-specific anti-gastrin-34 antibodies, with implications for understanding why the N-terminal arm of gastrin-34 is immunologically distinct from gastrin-17 despite sharing no sequence with the bioactive C-terminal region.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.55
Impact.55
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceLGPQGPP (7aa): Pro at positions 3, 6, 7; Gly at positions 2, 5 flanking Pro residues, classically associated with PPII-compatible conformations.
[2]
structurepLDDT=75.6 for the 7-mer, slightly lower than pep-10614 (76.7) and pep-10615 (76.8), consistent with a marginally less ordered structure at the minimum viable length.
[3]
notereadme_excerpt identifies this fragment as 'useful as an immunological and structural research tool' and notes the proline-rich arm is unique to gastrin-34, supporting the hypothesis that PPII geometry is the key immunological feature.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could this fragment slow down a gut enzyme that normally breaks down other signaling molecules in the intestine?

If this fragment inhibits the gut enzyme PEP, it could affect how the intestine processes inflammation signals and food-derived proteins, which is relevant to conditions like celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease.

The hypothesis
LGPQGPP, as a free C-terminal proline peptide, could act as a competitive substrate for prolyl endopeptidase (PEP), an enzyme that cleaves peptides C-terminal to Pro residues and is implicated in neuropeptide processing and celiac disease pathogenesis, thereby modulating PEP-dependent proteolytic cascades in the gastric or intestinal mucosa.
Why it’s plausible
PEP specifically cleaves after Pro residues in peptides. LGPQGPP terminates in PP (positions 6-7), presenting two consecutive potential PEP cleavage sites. Pro-rich sequences are competitive substrates for PEP at low concentrations. Since the gastric mucosa has documented PEP activity and this fragment would be generated locally during gastrin processing, it could act as an endogenous PEP modulator.
Why it matters
If this fragment modulates PEP activity in the gastric or intestinal lumen, it could influence processing of other biologically active peptides (such as substance P, neurotensin, or gluten-derived immunogenic peptides), revealing an unexpected cross-regulatory role for gastrin precursor fragments in mucosal proteolysis.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.60
Impact.50
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceLGPQGPP: consecutive Pro at positions 6-7 (C-terminus) represents a double PEP cleavage site motif; PEP cleaves C-terminal to Pro in short peptides.
[2]
notereadme_excerpt confirms this fragment is generated from gastrin precursor processing in the gut, establishing the biological setting where PEP is active.
[3]
paper
Gastrin biology review places gastrin family peptides in the gastrointestinal mucosal context where prolyl peptidases are active.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00112
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.9516605734825134 boltz-2
ranking score 0.7952330112457275 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde0.717global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Leu-Gly-Pro-Gln-Gly-Pro-Pro
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Gastrin-34 [1-8]: lab tool for studying gut satiety signals (pep-10613, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10613
@peptide{pep10613,
  sequence = {LGPQGPP},
  target   = {cckar},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
related peptides 3 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-09
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-09; we'll re-check periodically
references 4 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use