pe
pep-10612 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Minigastrin I: gut-signaling hormone fragment used in cancer research

A small piece of the gut hormone gastrin, first found in a rare pancreatic tumor; it triggers gallbladder and digestive signals and is used only as a lab research tool, mainly to develop scans that light up certain cancers.

statussynthesized targetCCKAR length13 aa refs3
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.852
pTM0.767
avg pLDDT73.8
ranking score0.761
STRUCTURE · PEP-10612 × CCKAR
ranking0.761
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence13 aa
151013
LEEEEEAYGWMDF
overview readme

What this is

Minigastrin I is a 13-amino-acid fragment of the human hormone gastrin, the gut peptide that signals the stomach to make acid. It was first purified in the 1970s from a rare pancreatic tumor (a gastrinoma) and corresponds to residues 5–17 of "little gastrin" (G17). In the body, the native peptide carries a C-terminal amide cap (Phe-NH₂) and exists in two forms — type I with an unmodified tyrosine and type II with a sulfated tyrosine — that occur in tumor tissue at roughly a 2:1 ratio (Gregory and Tracy, Gut, 1974). Today minigastrin is mainly studied as a starting scaffold for radiolabeled tracers that target the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R) on certain cancers.

History

The peptide was isolated in 1974 by R. A. Gregory and Hilda Tracy at the University of Liverpool from Zollinger-Ellison gastrinoma tumor tissue, alongside the longer gastrins from the same source (Gregory and Tracy, Gut, 1974). In the same issue of Gut, Debas, Walsh, and Grossman reported its in-vivo profile: pure human 13-residue minigastrin (HG-13-I) cleared from blood with a half-life of 1.8 minutes and was less than half as potent as 17-residue gastrin on a molar basis for stimulating gastric acid secretion in dogs (Debas, Walsh, and Grossman, Gut, 1974). After the discovery of the cholecystokinin-2 (gastrin/CCK-B) receptor and its expression on several human tumors, minigastrin re-emerged in the 2000s as a lead scaffold for receptor-targeted nuclear medicine (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).

What it does

Like full-length gastrin, minigastrin binds and activates the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R), a G-protein-coupled receptor expressed on stomach parietal cells, enterochromaffin-like cells, and a subset of brain and pancreatic cells. Receptor activation by gastrin peptides triggers gastric acid release and trophic signaling in gastrointestinal mucosa. The receptor-binding job is done by the conserved C-terminal tetrapeptide Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH₂ that all gastrin and cholecystokinin peptides share; the rest of the minigastrin sequence — including the run of five glutamates near the N-terminus — modulates affinity, charge, and pharmacokinetics rather than initial receptor recognition (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).

Mechanism

The stored sequence LEEEEEAYGWMDF is the bare 13-residue backbone; the biologically active peptide is the C-terminally amidated form (LEEEEEAYGWMDF-NH₂), and the "minigastrin II" variant additionally carries a sulfate on the single tyrosine. The amide cap and the C-terminal Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH₂ pharmacophore together drive CCK2R engagement (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011). Tyrosine sulfation differentiates the two natural variants: minigastrin I (non-sulfated) binds CCK2R selectively, while sulfated forms engage both CCK1 (CCKAR) and CCK2 receptors — a structural distinction exploited in tracer design, where non-sulfated minigastrin analogs are preferred for selective CCK2R imaging. The pentaglutamate stretch (Glu5–Glu9) is a major contributor to the very high anionic charge of the molecule and has been linked to off-target renal retention of radiolabeled minigastrin analogs, motivating engineered variants with reduced Glu content or substituted residues (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).

Evidence

  • Human: No therapeutic clinical trials of the native minigastrin I peptide. Clinical work centers on radiolabeled minigastrin analogs (rather than the parent peptide) as imaging agents and targeted radiotherapies for CCK2R-expressing tumors, primarily medullary thyroid carcinoma and small cell lung cancer (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).
  • Animal: Pure human 13-residue minigastrin (HG-13-I) was characterized in dogs in 1974, showing a plasma half-life of 1.8 minutes and a potency ratio of ~0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.6) relative to 17-residue gastrin for acid secretion (Debas, Walsh, and Grossman, Gut, 1974). Preclinical work continues on minigastrin-based tracers: a 2025 study reported that dimeric CCK2R-targeting radiotheranostic tracers, combined with mTOR inhibition, produced enhanced antitumor effects in CCK2R-positive tumor models (Bian and colleagues, Theranostics, 2025).
  • In vitro: Minigastrin and its analogs bind CCK2R with nanomolar affinity; the conserved C-terminal Trp-Met-Asp-Phe-NH₂ tetrapeptide is the receptor-binding pharmacophore, and non-sulfated forms are CCK2R-selective whereas sulfated forms also engage CCK1R (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).

Known effects

  • Gastric acid secretion — Mechanistic; demonstrated for the native peptide in dogs (Debas, Walsh, and Grossman, Gut, 1974).
  • CCK2R-targeted tumor imaging (as radiolabeled analog) — Preclinical and early clinical, with medullary thyroid carcinoma as the principal indication studied; native minigastrin is the scaffold, not the clinical agent (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).
  • Radiotheranostic delivery to CCK2R+ tumors (as engineered dimer) — Preclinical (Bian and colleagues, Theranostics, 2025).

Safety signals

Native minigastrin I is not used as a therapeutic in humans, so a clinical safety profile for the parent peptide is not established. For radiolabeled minigastrin analogs, the principal published limitation is off-target accumulation of radioactivity in the kidneys, which constrains the deliverable tumor dose and motivates ongoing analog engineering (Roosenburg and colleagues, Amino Acids, 2011).

Regulatory status

  • US: Not an FDA-approved drug. Used as a research reagent.
  • EU: No EMA approval as a medicinal product.
  • Research use: Available from peptide suppliers as a synthetic standard for CCK2R pharmacology and as a starting point for tracer chemistry.
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Has Minigastrin I been assigned to the wrong receptor in the database, given that all published cancer imaging studies use it to target CCK2R?

Correcting this annotation would prevent researchers from drawing false conclusions about CCK1R pharmacology from Minigastrin data, and would ensure that cancer imaging scientists can find this peptide correctly when searching for CCK2R-targeted agents.

The hypothesis
The annotation of Minigastrin I (LEEEEEAYGWMDF) to CCKAR rather than CCKBR (CCK2R) is a database error: the pentaGlu motif (EEEEE) and the C-terminal YGWMDF sequence are hallmarks of CCK2R/gastrin-receptor ligands, not CCK1R ligands, and the moderately high but imperfect ipTM (0.852) against the annotated CCKAR reflects weak non-cognate docking rather than the true high-affinity CCK2R interaction.
Why it’s plausible
Minigastrin is extensively documented in the nuclear medicine literature as a CCK2R-targeted tracer scaffold (Roosenburg et al., Amino Acids, 2011, cited in readme). The polyGlu spacer and C-terminal -YGWMDF are structural features that confer CCK2R selectivity. CCK1R requires sulfated Tyr and has strict C-terminal requirements that differ from gastrin. The readme states it is 'mainly studied as a starting scaffold for radiolabeled tracers that target CCK2R,' directly contradicting the CCKAR annotation.
Why it matters
If the CCKAR annotation is wrong and the true target is CCK2R, then any computational or experimental work using this card to study CCK1R biology is misdirected. Correct annotation matters for the nuclear medicine field, where Minigastrin analogs are in clinical trials for PET imaging of CCK2R-overexpressing cancers (medullary thyroid carcinoma, SCLC).
Plausibility.95
Novelty.30
Impact.80
Basis · grounding1 paper · 3 computed/notes
[1]
notereadme_excerpt explicitly states Minigastrin I is 'mainly studied as a starting scaffold for radiolabeled tracers that target CCK2R on certain cancers,' directly naming CCK2R as the relevant receptor.
[2]
paper
Roosenburg 2011 (Amino Acids) cited in readme covers CCK2R-targeted Minigastrin analogs for nuclear medicine, confirming CCK2R as the pharmacologically relevant target.
doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0501-y
[3]
structureipTM=0.8521 against CCKAR is lower than the other gastrin fragments against the same receptor (0.918-0.965), consistent with non-cognate docking.
[4]
sequenceLEEEEEAYGWMDF: polyGlu (EEEEE) is a CCK2R-selective spacer used in clinical Minigastrin analogs; C-terminal YGWMDF matches the gastrin CCK2R pharmacophore.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could Minigastrin be adapted to carry a new type of cancer drug called a PROTAC selectively into tumor cells that overexpress its receptor?

If Minigastrin can deliver protein-degrading drugs directly into the right cancer cells, it could enable effective treatment of rare but aggressive neuroendocrine tumors like medullary thyroid cancer and small cell lung cancer, with much less harm to healthy tissues than conventional chemotherapy.

The hypothesis
Minigastrin I (LEEEEEAYGWMDF) could serve as a CCK2R-targeted carrier for PROTAC-type bifunctional degraders in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC), where CCK2R is overexpressed, enabling tumor-selective delivery of a protein-degrading warhead without systemic toxicity.
Why it’s plausible
CCK2R overexpression in MTC and SCLC is well-documented and is the basis for Minigastrin radiopeptide tracers. PROTAC delivery to specific cell types is a current limitation of the technology. Minigastrin's C-terminal pharmacophore could be retained for CCK2R internalization while the N-terminal Leu and polyGlu spacer are available for warhead conjugation. Receptor internalization following CCK2R binding would facilitate intracellular PROTAC delivery.
Why it matters
Tumor-selective PROTACs remain a major unmet need. If Minigastrin can internalize a degrader payload via CCK2R, this would represent the first receptor-targeted PROTAC approach for neuroendocrine tumors, which are currently difficult to treat with standard chemotherapy.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.70
Impact.75
Basis · grounding2 papers · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteMinigastrin I is established as a CCK2R-targeting scaffold for tumor-selective delivery (radiolabeled tracers), demonstrating receptor-mediated tumor uptake and internalization.
[2]
paper
In vivo tumor imaging/therapy studies with Minigastrin analogs confirm CCK2R-driven tumor accumulation in animal models.
doi: 10.7150/thno.117021
[3]
paper
Roosenburg 2011 reviews CCK2R expression in MTC and SCLC as the targeting rationale for Minigastrin analogs, establishing the tumor biology context.
doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0501-y
[4]
sequenceLEEEEEAYGWMDF: N-terminal Leu and polyGlu spacer (6 residues) are chemically available for linker attachment while preserving the C-terminal -YGWMDF pharmacophore.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is the string of five glutamate amino acids in Minigastrin just a generic charge spacer, or does it have a specific chemical role that cannot be replaced?

If the glutamate stretch is replaceable, researchers could design improved versions of Minigastrin-based cancer imaging agents with less accumulation in the kidneys, reducing radiation dose to patients during PET or SPECT imaging of tumors.

The hypothesis
The five consecutive glutamate residues (EEEEE) in LEEEEEAYGWMDF function as a polyanionic electrostatic shield that prevents the C-terminal bioactive sequence (-AYGWMDF) from folding back onto itself or from non-specifically adsorbing to cell surfaces, and this shield role is independent of any contribution to CCK2R binding affinity, meaning the polyGlu can be replaced by other polyanionic spacers without loss of receptor potency.
Why it’s plausible
PolyGlu spacers in Minigastrin analogs are retained in nuclear medicine tracer design empirically, but the mechanistic basis is debated. Electrostatic repulsion from the cell membrane (net negative at physiological pH) combined with prevention of intramolecular hydrophobic collapse around the Trp-Met-Asp-Phe pharmacophore are two plausible roles. If the function is purely electrostatic, synthetic polyanions (e.g., polyAspartate, phosphopeptide segments) should substitute without pharmacological penalty.
Why it matters
If the EEEEE spacer is functionally replaceable by any polyanion, this opens design space for Minigastrin-based cancer tracers with improved pharmacokinetics (e.g., reduced kidney uptake, a known limitation of polyGlu-containing radiopeptides) by substituting the glutamate stretch with less nephrotoxic polyanionic sequences.
Plausibility.65
Novelty.55
Impact.65
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
sequenceLEEEEEAYGWMDF: five Glu residues (net charge -5 at pH 7) precede the AYGWMDF pharmacophore; this is the longest anionic spacer in naturally occurring gastrin fragments.
[2]
paper
Roosenburg 2011 reviews Minigastrin analog modifications for nuclear medicine, including spacer variations, establishing that spacer engineering is an active area.
doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0501-y
[3]
paper
Tumor volume and body weight monitoring in Minigastrin analog in vivo studies, confirming this scaffold is used in live animal cancer models where spacer pharmacokinetics matter.
doi: 10.7150/thno.117021
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could replacing some of the glutamate amino acids in Minigastrin with a modified version reduce kidney damage while keeping the cancer-targeting ability intact?

Kidney damage currently limits how much of a Minigastrin-based cancer therapy can be given safely. Solving this problem could allow doctors to give higher, more effective doses to patients with medullary thyroid cancer or small cell lung cancer, potentially improving cure rates.

The hypothesis
Replacing the five-Glu spacer in Minigastrin I with a mixed Glu-Sar (sarcosine) sequence of equal anionic charge but reduced backbone hydrogen-bond donor capacity would decrease renal tubular reabsorption of the peptide without altering CCK2R affinity, addressing the kidney dose limitation that has slowed clinical adoption of Minigastrin-based radiopeptide therapy.
Why it’s plausible
Renal reabsorption of polyanionic peptides involves tubular megalin-mediated uptake that depends on both charge and backbone amide hydrogen bonding. Sarcosine (N-methyl-Gly) eliminates backbone NH donors and disrupts regular secondary structure without changing the number of methylene groups or overall charge when substituted for Gly residues. A hybrid Glu-Sar spacer maintaining 5 negative charges but with reduced backbone donor capacity could exploit this to reduce megalin binding without affecting the C-terminal pharmacophore.
Why it matters
Kidney toxicity from renal peptide retention is the primary dose-limiting factor for all polyGlu-containing Minigastrin radiopeptide therapeutics. A Glu-Sar hybrid spacer that reduces renal uptake while preserving tumor targeting could increase the therapeutic window for Minigastrin-based targeted radionuclide therapy, potentially enabling curative rather than palliative doses.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.65
Impact.75
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
Roosenburg 2011 reviews kidney uptake as a primary challenge for Minigastrin radiotracer development and discusses spacer modifications aimed at this problem.
doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0501-y
[2]
paper
In vivo studies confirm kidney accumulation monitoring as a key safety endpoint in Minigastrin analog therapy studies.
doi: 10.7150/thno.117021
[3]
sequenceLEEEEEAYGWMDF: the five Glu residues are the primary site for chemical modification without disturbing the AYGWMDF pharmacophore; sarcosine substitution within the spacer is chemically feasible.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is the version of Minigastrin without a sulfate chemical modification more specific for cancer cells and less likely to show up in healthy pancreatic tissue during imaging scans?

If the unsulfated form is more tumor-specific, it would reduce false signals from the pancreas during PET scans for medullary thyroid cancer and small cell lung cancer, making the diagnosis clearer and reducing the need for additional confirmatory tests.

The hypothesis
The unsulfated (type I) form of Minigastrin I (Tyr unsulfated, as in the stored sequence LEEEEEAYGWMDF) is more selective for CCK2R over CCK1R than the sulfated (type II) form, because sulfo-Tyr engages an additional binding interaction in CCK1R that is absent in CCK2R, and clinical tracers based on unsulfated Minigastrin therefore have intrinsically higher tumor-to-background ratios in CCK1R-positive tissues such as the pancreas.
Why it’s plausible
Gastrin and CCK peptides with sulfated Tyr generally show enhanced CCK1R binding relative to unsulfated forms, because CCK1R has a specific electrostatic interaction with the sulfate group. CCK2R shows less discrimination between sulfated and unsulfated forms. Minigastrin from gastrinoma tissue occurs as 2:1 type I (unsulfated) to type II (sulfated) mixture. Nuclear medicine tracers based on the unsulfated form would thus have better CCK2R/CCK1R selectivity, reducing pancreatic background in imaging.
Why it matters
If unsulfated Minigastrin has intrinsically better CCK2R selectivity, the majority of clinical Minigastrin tracer development has been inadvertently optimized in the correct direction, and deliberate use of the unsulfated form should be specified in tracer design to minimize pancreatic uptake artifacts in MTC imaging.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.45
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
notereadme_excerpt states the type I (unsulfated Tyr) and type II (sulfated Tyr) forms occur in gastrinoma tissue at approximately 2:1 ratio, and the stored sequence is the unsulfated form.
[2]
paper
CCKAR pharmacology review documents the role of sulfo-Tyr in CCK peptide binding to CCK1R, supporting differential selectivity based on sulfation state.
doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.05.001
[3]
sequenceLEEEEEAYGWMDF: Tyr at position 8 is unmodified (no sulfation); this is the type I form with potentially lower CCK1R affinity.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.8521436452865601 boltz-2
ranking score 0.7606279253959656 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde1.280global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Leu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Glu-Ala-Tyr-Gly-Trp-Met-Asp-Phe
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Minigastrin I: gut-signaling hormone fragment used in cancer research (pep-10612, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10612
@peptide{pep10612,
  sequence = {LEEEEEAYGWMDF},
  target   = {cckar},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 2 on ct.gov · 1 on EUCTR · checked 2026-05-22
ct.gov trials 2
EUCTR 1
by phase
2phase 11phase 2
by status
1completed1active
references 3 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use