pe
pep-10454 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Ranatachykinin A: frog pain-signaling peptide (CHEMBL384518)

A small peptide from the American bullfrog that switches on the same nerve receptor (NK1) involved in pain signaling and gut squeezing in mammals; used only as a laboratory research tool.

statusbioassayed targetTACR1 length11 aa refs1
status 5 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 2.2.1
ipTM0.957
pTM0.814
avg pLDDT70.2
ranking score0.753
STRUCTURE · PEP-10454 × TACR1
ranking0.753
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 2.2.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence11 aa
151011
KPSPDRFYGLM
in the news 1 article
overview readme

What this is

Ranatachykinin A is an 11-amino-acid neuropeptide first isolated from the brain and intestine of the American bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana). It belongs to the tachykinin family — a group of signaling peptides found across vertebrates that share a conserved C-terminal fingerprint sequence (Phe-X-Gly-Leu-Met) and activate receptors involved in pain signaling, gut contraction, and inflammation. Ranatachykinin A binds the tachykinin NK1 receptor (TACR1), the same receptor targeted by the mammalian peptide substance P. The raw sequence stored here (KPSPDRFYGLM) represents the amino acid backbone; the biologically active form carries a C-terminal amide group (–NH₂) not shown in the single-letter code, which is characteristic of all vertebrate tachykinins and required for receptor binding.

History

Tachykinins as a class were first hinted at in 1931, when von Euler and Gaddum discovered a tissue extract from horse brain and intestine that caused intestinal contraction and vasodilation — a substance they called "P." Substance P's amino acid sequence was not determined until 1971 (Chang, horse intestine). Ranatachykinin A was identified much later, in 1991, when Kozawa and colleagues purified four novel tachykinins from bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) brain and intestine (Kozawa et al., Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1991). All four peptides — ranatachykinins A, B, C, and D — displayed potent stimulant effects on guinea pig ileum smooth muscle, a classic bioassay for tachykinin activity. The structural and pharmacological properties of ranatachykinin A at the cloned bullfrog substance P receptor were characterised in detail by Perrine and colleagues (Perrine et al., Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2000).

What it does

Ranatachykinin A activates NK1 receptors on smooth muscle, neurons, and immune cells, triggering a cascade of responses including muscle contraction, pain signal amplification, and inflammatory cell recruitment. At the bullfrog substance P receptor expressed in cell culture, ranatachykinin A shows potency at least equal to substance P itself — the rank order of agonist activity across the three canonical ranatachykinins was RTKA ≥ SP > RTKC ≥ RTKB (Perrine et al. 2000). In bullfrog sensory neurons, tachykinins activate NK1 receptors to suppress potassium channels and generate inward electrical currents, which is thought to underlie their role in sensory transmission (Tachykinins cause inward current through NK1 receptors in bullfrog sensory neurons, 1996).

Evidence

  • Human: No human trials exist for ranatachykinin A itself. It has been studied as a pharmacological tool to probe the bullfrog substance P receptor and to compare tachykinin structural diversity across species.
  • Animal: Ranatachykinin A was shown to stimulate guinea pig ileum smooth muscle contraction with potent activity (Kozawa et al. 1991). At the cloned bullfrog substance P receptor (bfSPR) transfected into Chinese hamster ovary cells, ranatachykinin A produced calcium mobilisation responses comparable to or exceeding those of substance P (Perrine et al. 2000). The receptor cloned from bullfrog sympathetic ganglion showed 69% sequence identity to mammalian substance P receptors and responded to tachykinin agonists in the order SP > NKA >> NKB (Molecular characterization of a substance P receptor from Rana catesbeiana sympathetic ganglion, 1997).
  • In vitro: EC50 = 0.6 nM at TACR1 (ChEMBL bioassay, CHEMBL384518).

Mechanism

TACR1 (NK1 receptor) is a G protein-coupled receptor that primarily signals through Gq/11, activating phospholipase C to generate inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol, raising intracellular calcium. Downstream effects include ERK1/2 phosphorylation via protein kinase C, NF-κB-mediated inflammatory gene expression, and PI3K/Akt cell-survival signalling (Garcia-Recio and Gascón, BioMed Research International, 2015). The critical pharmacophore in all tachykinins is the C-terminal Phe-X-Gly-Leu-Met-NH₂ sequence, which docks into the orthosteric binding site of the receptor; the N-terminal residues modulate receptor subtype selectivity and signalling bias but are dispensable for activation. NMR studies of ranatachykinin A and its bullfrog relatives in SDS micelles revealed a helical conformation spanning the midregion to C-terminus (residues 4–10), with a flexible N-terminus — a structure that may account for the differences in desensitisation kinetics observed between RTKA and RTKC (Perrine et al. 2000).

Related peptides

The tachykinin family at TACR1 includes substance P (the canonical human NK1 agonist) and a range of amphibian and invertebrate variants that have been used to map receptor binding determinants. Other ranatachykinins (B, C, D) were isolated alongside RTKA from the same bullfrog tissue preparation (Kozawa et al. 1991) and differ primarily in their N-terminal residues and in the identity of the variable position within the conserved C-terminal motif.

Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-11

Does the frog version of substance P stick to one pain receptor subtype while avoiding others?

If it turns out to favor NK1, this frog peptide could be a cleaner tool for studying NK1-specific pain signaling. Note: this is an untested prediction; the acidic residue is at position 5 (Asp), not 6, and selectivity has not yet been measured.

The hypothesis
Ranatachykinin A's unique N-terminal KPSPDR segment, which differs substantially from mammalian substance P's RPKPQQFF, confers differential subtype selectivity favoring NK1R over NK2R and NK3R, making it a more selective NK1R probe than substance P itself.
Why it’s plausible
Substance P (RPKPQQFFGLM) activates NK1, NK2, and NK3 receptors with varying potency. Ranatachykinin A shares the conserved FYGLM C-terminal pharmacophore but has a shorter, charge-distinct N-terminus (KPSPDR vs RPKPQQFF). The Asp-6 and the double-Pro scaffold at positions 2 and 4 impose structural constraints absent in mammalian tachykinins, which could limit productive engagement at NK2/NK3 binding interfaces that require N-terminal flexibility.
Why it matters
A naturally occurring tachykinin with higher NK1R selectivity than substance P would be a cleaner pharmacological tool for disentangling NK1R-specific pain and inflammatory pathways, and could serve as a starting scaffold for analgesic drug design.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.55
Impact.60
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceN-terminal KPSPDR contains two prolines (P2, P4) and an aspartate (D6) not present in mammalian substance P, constraining N-terminal conformation.
[2]
noteReadme confirms ranatachykinin A binds TACR1/NK1R, the same receptor as substance P, but does not address NK2/NK3 activity.
[3]
structureipTM = 0.957 for TACR1 complex indicates high structural confidence for NK1R binding.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Can this frog intestine peptide be used to model the gut signaling involved in nausea and bowel disease?

Because it came from frog intestine and acts on gut NK1 receptors, ranatachykinin A could be a probe for the NK1-serotonin pathway that drives nausea and abnormal gut contractions. The idea that it avoids receptor desensitization is an added guess that would need checking.

The hypothesis
Ranatachykinin A can activate NK1R on intestinal enterochromaffin cells to stimulate serotonin release, positioning it as a candidate probe for enteric nervous system dysfunction in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) or chemotherapy-induced nausea, conditions where tachykinin-serotonin crosstalk is dysregulated.
Why it’s plausible
Substance P activates NK1R on intestinal enterochromaffin cells, triggering serotonin (5-HT) release that drives gut motility and nausea. The readme confirms ranatachykinin A was originally isolated from bullfrog intestine and shows potent effects on guinea pig ileum smooth muscle. If the ipTM-confirmed TACR1 binding pose is orthosteric and activating, the same intestinal NK1R-5HT axis is plausibly engaged. The non-mammalian scaffold might bypass NK1R desensitization pathways triggered by substance P.
Why it matters
NK1R antagonists (aprepitant) are already used for chemotherapy-induced nausea, and NK1R agonists that spare desensitization could model the pathological state more faithfully in gut organoid or animal research. Understanding this axis has direct relevance for IBS and post-chemotherapy gut dysfunction affecting millions of patients.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.55
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
noteRanatachykinin A was isolated from bullfrog intestine and potently stimulates guinea pig ileum smooth muscle, directly implicating the gut NK1R-motility axis.
[2]
structureipTM = 0.957 supports confident orthosteric binding at TACR1, the receptor mediating intestinal serotonin release.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Can chemists swap the frog peptide's non-binding end to make a targeted carrier for NK1-expressing cancers?

Because the N-terminus is not the binding pharmacophore, it can likely be replaced, mirroring existing NK1-targeted substance P analogs used against tumors that overexpress NK1. The binding end itself already provides the tumor-homing, so this is an engineering extension of a known approach.

The hypothesis
The KPSPDR N-terminal segment of ranatachykinin A can be replaced with a cell-penetrating or tissue-targeting sequence without disrupting NK1R binding, creating a bifunctional conjugate that delivers a pharmacological payload to NK1R-expressing neuronal or tumor cells.
Why it’s plausible
The divergent N-terminus (KPSPDR) does not belong to the conserved tachykinin pharmacophore (FYGLM-NH2). Its charged, Pro-constrained structure suggests it acts as a solubility or stability tag rather than a binding determinant. This modularity is a recognized feature of tachykinin engineering: N-terminal substitutions on substance P analogs have been explored for tumor targeting because NK1R is overexpressed in several cancers. The intact FYGLM-NH2 C-terminal pharmacophore should retain TACR1 engagement after N-terminal grafting.
Why it matters
If the N-terminus is truly modular, ranatachykinin A becomes a chassis for targeted drug delivery to any NK1R-overexpressing tissue, including neuroblastoma, glioblastoma, and pancreatic tumors, where NK1R is a validated tumor marker.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.45
Impact.55
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceN-terminal KPSPDR is divergent from the conserved tachykinin FXGLM pharmacophore; Pro at positions 2 and 4 suggest structural rather than binding role.
[2]
paper
Medicinal chemistry SAR study on tachykinin analogs, consistent with documented N-terminal engineering of substance P-class peptides for receptor targeting.
doi: 10.1021/jm000093v
[3]
noteReadme identifies TACR1 as the binding target and FYGLM C-terminus as the conserved pharmacophore, implying N-terminal region is non-essential for receptor engagement.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Can a short fragment of this frog peptide still trigger the NK1 pain receptor?

For tachykinins it is already well known that the C-terminal five residues drive receptor activation, so a short FYGLM-NH2 fragment likely retains activity. Confirming this for ranatachykinin A would let chemists treat the front end as a separate handle for stability or targeting.

The hypothesis
The C-terminal amide on Ranatachykinin A is the dominant binding determinant for TACR1, and the N-terminal KPSPDR segment primarily modulates binding kinetics rather than affinity, such that truncated C-terminal fragments (FYGLM-NH2 or RFYGLM-NH2) retain substantial NK1R agonist activity.
Why it’s plausible
Tachykinin structure-activity studies on substance P and related peptides consistently show the C-terminal pentapeptide (FXGLM-NH2) is sufficient for receptor activation. The high ipTM (0.957) for the full-length peptide-TACR1 complex suggests the C-terminal pharmacophore drives the confident docking pose. The N-terminal KPSPDR contains charged and helix-breaking residues (Pro at 2, 4) unlikely to form a compact binding epitope, consistent with an accessory rather than critical role.
Why it matters
If short C-terminal fragments retain full activity, this would confirm the N-terminal KPSPDR as a bioavailability and stability handle that could be engineered independently of the pharmacophore, enabling modular optimization of NK1R-targeted peptide drugs.
Plausibility.80
Novelty.20
Impact.40
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceC-terminal FYGLM matches the conserved tachykinin pharmacophore. N-terminal KPSPDR is divergent from mammalian tachykinins.
[2]
noteReadme states C-terminal amide is required for receptor binding, implying C-terminus is the critical pharmacophoric region.
[3]
structureHigh ipTM = 0.957 for TACR1 complex, but pLDDT = 70.2 suggests moderate structural disorder, consistent with a flexible N-terminus.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Does this frog pain peptide last longer in the body than the equivalent human peptide?

An N-terminal proline can slow aminopeptidase trimming, so ranatachykinin A could be somewhat more stable at its front end. But ACE and neprilysin are not aminopeptidases and they cut at the shared C-terminal region, so broad protease resistance is not established and would need direct testing.

The hypothesis
Ranatachykinin A's non-mammalian N-terminal sequence (KPSPDR) renders it resistant to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and neprilysin, the two principal proteases that inactivate substance P in vivo, giving it a longer effective half-life in plasma and neural tissue than mammalian substance P at equivalent doses.
Why it’s plausible
Substance P is rapidly cleaved by ACE at the Phe8-Gly9 bond and by neprilysin at multiple sites including the N-terminus. Ranatachykinin A's KPSPDR N-terminus includes Lys-1 and Pro-2: proline at position 2 is a known inhibitor of aminopeptidase cleavage (proline exclusion rule). The shorter peptide chain and different charge distribution may also reduce neprilysin recognition. A more protease-stable NK1R agonist could achieve sustained receptor activation at lower doses.
Why it matters
Protease stability is a major bottleneck for peptide therapeutics. If ranatachykinin A is intrinsically more stable than substance P in biological fluids, it could serve as a longer-acting NK1R agonist for conditions where sustained signaling is beneficial, such as in wound healing, neurogenic inflammation modulation, or as a research tool.
Plausibility.40
Novelty.50
Impact.55
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
sequencePro at position 2 (KPSP...) consistent with proline-mediated resistance to aminopeptidase N and some metallopeptidases; sequence differs substantially from substance P's ACE cleavage site context.
[2]
noteRanatachykinin A is a frog peptide sharing the tachykinin C-terminal pharmacophore but with a divergent N-terminus, implying different protease substrate profile from mammalian substance P.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table1 metrics
metricvaluetool
EC50 0.6 nM GPCRDB/ChEMBL
3-letter notation
Lys-Pro-Ser-Pro-Asp-Arg-Phe-Tyr-Gly-Leu-Met
recipeboltz-2 2.2.1
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 2.2.1
weights
hardwarevast_v100_32gb
mlx version
python
random seed1
msa strategycolabfold_local
runtime
predicted by
predicted at2026-05-22
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Ranatachykinin A: frog pain-signaling peptide (CHEMBL384518) (pep-10454, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10454
@peptide{pep10454,
  sequence = {KPSPDRFYGLM},
  target   = {tacr1},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {bioassayed}
}
related peptides 1 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 1 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use