pe
pep-10451 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Substance P receptor-binding peptide (CHEMBL2370435)

A synthetic peptide closely related to Substance P, a natural pain-and-inflammation signaler, that binds tightly to its receptor; used only as a lab research tool.

statusbioassayed targetTACR1 length10 aa refs2
status 5 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.794
pTM0.763
avg pLDDT69.1
ranking score0.712
STRUCTURE · PEP-10451 × TACR1
ranking0.712
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence10 aa
1510
RPKPQQFFAL
in the news 1 article
overview readme

What this is

CHEMBL2370435 is a 10-residue synthetic peptide that binds to the tachykinin NK1 receptor (TACR1, also called the substance P receptor or NK1R) with sub-nanomolar affinity. It is structurally derived from Substance P, the archetypal endogenous NK1R ligand, and carries the N-terminal sequence Arg-Pro-Lys-Pro-Gln-Gln-Phe-Phe shared with that neuropeptide. The stored sequence (RPKPQQFFAL) differs from full-length Substance P (RPKPQQFFGLM-NH₂) at position 9 — an alanine replaces glycine — and lacks the C-terminal Met-NH₂ that is present on all naturally occurring tachykinins; this modification context matters for interpreting the binding data.

What it does

This compound binds to TACR1 with a Ki of 0.41 nM (ChEMBL assay CHEMBL2370435). TACR1 is the principal receptor for the endogenous neuropeptide Substance P: its activation couples to Gq/11 proteins, triggering phospholipase Cβ to hydrolyse PIP₂ into inositol trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG), which mobilise intracellular calcium and activate protein kinase C. Through this pathway, Substance P and related tachykinin ligands modulate pain transmission, neurogenic inflammation, smooth muscle tone, and the emetic reflex (Garcia-Recio and Gascón 2015, BioMed Research International). Whether CHEMBL2370435 acts as an agonist, partial agonist, or antagonist at this site has not been established in publicly available literature; the ChEMBL entry documents binding affinity only.

Evidence

  • Human: No human studies specifically on this compound are registered on ClinicalTrials.gov or in published literature. The broader TACR1 pharmacological axis is validated in humans through approved NK1R antagonist drugs (aprepitant, fosaprepitant, netupitant) used clinically for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
  • Animal: Not reported for this specific compound.
  • In vitro: Ki = 0.41 nM at human TACR1 (ChEMBL, bioassay CHEMBL2370435).

Mechanism

TACR1 is a seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) with 407 amino acids. On activation by Substance P or related tachykinins, it couples primarily through Gq/11 to activate phospholipase Cβ, producing IP3 and DAG; IP3 triggers endoplasmic reticulum calcium release while DAG activates protein kinase C. The NK1 receptor is also capable of signalling through β-arrestin following phosphorylation of its C-terminal intracellular domain, leading to receptor internalisation (StatPearls, Biochemistry: Substance P).

The tachykinin C-terminal consensus motif (-Phe-X-Gly-Leu-Met-NH₂) is the primary pharmacophore for NK1R activation: deamidation of the C-terminal Met-NH₂ suppresses biological activity, and all naturally occurring tachykinins retain this amidated tail (Garcia-Recio and Gascón 2015). CHEMBL2370435 lacks Met at position 11 and carries Ala rather than Gly at position 9; its sub-nanomolar binding affinity nonetheless indicates productive engagement with the orthosteric binding pocket. The N-terminal segment (Arg-Pro-Lys-Pro-Gln-Gln) contributes selectivity toward NK1R over the related NK2 and NK3 subtypes, as established in structure–activity studies of Substance P analogs (Cascieri and colleagues 1992, Molecular Pharmacology).

Related peptides

  • CHEMBL1651026 (/card/pep-10446) — a nine-residue NK1R research agonist (RPKPQQFFL) from the [Sar⁹,Met(O₂)¹¹]-substance P family; shares the same RPKPQQFF N-terminal core.
  • Ranatachykinin C (/card/pep-10453) — a frog-derived 10-residue tachykinin (HNPASFIGLM-NH₂) that activates TACR1 at EC50 = 13.5 nM and provides a non-mammalian comparator for the tachykinin binding mode.
  • Neurokinin A (/card/pep-04472) — the co-produced tachykinin from the TAC1 gene that preferentially activates NK2R; shares biosynthetic origin with Substance P and illustrates how N-terminal sequence determines tachykinin receptor selectivity.
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-11

Does swapping one amino acid turn this peptide from a substance P mimic into a substance P blocker on the NK1 receptor?

If true, this peptide could be a useful starting template for designing drugs that block chronic pain and chemotherapy-induced nausea without switching the receptor on, an area with few good options.

The hypothesis
The Gly9Ala substitution in RPKPQQFFAL shifts the compound from full NK1R agonism toward partial agonism or functional antagonism by restricting C-terminal backbone flexibility required for full Gq/11 coupling efficacy.
Why it’s plausible
Substance P's C-terminal Gly-Met-NH2 is known to be critical for receptor activation. Replacing Gly9 with the bulkier, helix-stabilizing Ala and removing Met-NH2 could lock the peptide in a conformation that occupies the orthosteric site with high affinity (Ki 0.41 nM) but fails to drive full receptor conformational change. This would make the compound a biased or partial ligand despite tight binding.
Why it matters
If confirmed as a partial agonist or antagonist, RPKPQQFFAL would become a valuable tool to dissect NK1R signaling bias (pain vs. nausea pathways) and a scaffold for developing selective NK1R antagonists for emesis or chronic pain without full activation.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.60
Impact.70
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence RPKPQQFFAL has Ala at position 9 replacing Gly in canonical Substance P (RPKPQQFFGLM-NH2), and lacks C-terminal Met-NH2.
[2]
noteREADME states agonist/antagonist status is unknown; binding affinity Ki=0.41 nM is documented but functional mode is not.
[3]
structureipTM=0.794 indicates moderate-high confidence in the complex pose, consistent with occupying the orthosteric pocket, but pLDDT=69.1 flags conformational ambiguity in the bound peptide.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Does removing the tail end of substance P accidentally create a peptide that targets only the NK1 receptor and not its close relatives?

A highly selective NK1 blocker would be safer than drugs that hit multiple receptor types, potentially reducing respiratory or central nervous system side effects in patients being treated for pain or nausea.

The hypothesis
RPKPQQFFAL is selective for NK1R over the related NK2R and NK3R subtypes because the Ala9 substitution and absence of Met-NH2 eliminate the C-terminal contacts that drive cross-reactivity with the other tachykinin receptors.
Why it’s plausible
NK2R and NK3R have distinct binding pockets whose endogenous ligands (NKA, NKB) differ mainly at the C-terminus. Substance P's C-terminal GLM-NH2 contributes to low-level cross-receptor activity. Truncating and modifying this C-terminus in RPKPQQFFAL likely eliminates those interactions, potentially conferring better NK1R selectivity than the parent peptide despite the shared N-terminal RPKPQQ pharmacophore.
Why it matters
NK1R-selective ligands are therapeutically important for avoiding side effects that come from activating NK2R (bronchoconstriction) or NK3R (CNS effects). Confirming selectivity would validate this scaffold for respiratory-safe anti-emetic or analgesic development.
Plausibility.65
Novelty.55
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceC-terminal Met-NH2 absent and Gly9 replaced by Ala; these C-terminal residues are the primary selectivity determinants across the tachykinin receptor family.
[2]
noteREADME identifies TACR1 as the sole annotated target; no NK2R or NK3R activity data is mentioned.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Do the two proline residues that create a sharp bend force the peptide into exactly the right shape to grip the NK1 receptor very tightly?

Understanding which structural feature drives the very tight binding could allow chemists to design small, stable drug molecules that mimic just that feature, making better pain or nausea medications that do not need to be injected.

The hypothesis
The dual Pro residues at positions 2 and 4 (RPKPQQFFAL) create a rigid kinked backbone that positions the Phe-Phe dipeptide at positions 7-8 as a hydrophobic anchor for deep NK1R transmembrane binding, and this structural constraint is the primary driver of the sub-nanomolar affinity.
Why it’s plausible
Pro2 and Pro4 restrict phi/psi angles around the N-terminal segment, creating a well-defined turn structure. This rigidity could pre-organize the FFAL C-terminal hydrophobic segment to slot into the aromatic-rich TM pocket of NK1R. The sub-nanomolar Ki (0.41 nM) despite the truncated C-terminus supports the idea that the N-terminal Pro-Pro scaffold is doing primary affinity work, not the missing Met-NH2.
Why it matters
Identifying the Pro-Pro kink as the high-affinity anchor would explain why this 10-mer achieves sub-nanomolar binding and would guide minimal pharmacophore design: a constrained Pro-Pro scaffold bearing FF could yield peptidomimetics with drug-like properties.
Plausibility.65
Novelty.50
Impact.60
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence contains Pro at positions 2 and 4, Phe-Phe at positions 7-8, in a 10-residue chain RPKPQQFFAL.
[2]
structureipTM=0.794 indicates confident complex geometry, consistent with a specific binding mode driven by constrained N-terminal structure.
[3]
noteREADME notes Ki=0.41 nM, a sub-nanomolar affinity that is retained despite removal of the C-terminal Met-NH2 found in all natural tachykinins.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could this peptide, which binds tightly to a receptor overactive in some cancers, slow the growth or spread of those tumors?

If this peptide suppresses tumor growth through the NK1 receptor, it could be a starting point for new cancer treatments, especially for pancreatic or brain cancers where good therapies are scarce.

The hypothesis
Because TACR1 is overexpressed in several solid tumor types (breast, pancreatic, glioma) and drives proliferative and pro-migratory signaling via Gq/11-PKC-ERK, RPKPQQFFAL could suppress tumor cell growth and migration if it functions as an NK1R antagonist.
Why it’s plausible
NK1R overexpression in cancer drives autocrine Substance P loops supporting tumor survival. Several NK1R antagonists have shown anti-tumor effects in preclinical models. RPKPQQFFAL binds NK1R at 0.41 nM, far below the micromolar concentrations typically needed for anti-tumor effects by small-molecule antagonists. If functional antagonism is confirmed, it would be active at concentrations orders of magnitude below current repurposing candidates.
Why it matters
Repurposing high-affinity NK1R ligands as anti-cancer agents is an active research area. A peptide with 0.41 nM Ki that acts as an antagonist would be among the most potent NK1R-targeting anti-tumor agents reported, potentially validating the NK1R-cancer axis at very low dose.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.45
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
noteREADME confirms Ki=0.41 nM at TACR1/NK1R; TACR1 is the principal receptor for Substance P which activates Gq/11-PKC proliferative signaling.
[2]
noteREADME states agonist/antagonist status is unknown, making the oncology repurposing hypothesis contingent on confirming antagonism.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could forming a ring out of this peptide stop it from being broken down in the bloodstream and let it enter the brain to treat pain or depression?

A stable, brain-penetrant version would open doors to new treatments for central pain conditions and possibly depression, for patients who do not respond to current therapies.

The hypothesis
Cyclizing RPKPQQFFAL by linking the N-terminal Arg to the C-terminal Ala via a lactam or disulfide-mimicking linker will further improve proteolytic stability and blood-brain barrier permeability while maintaining sub-nanomolar NK1R affinity, making it viable for CNS delivery.
Why it’s plausible
Linear peptides with free termini are vulnerable to exopeptidases; cyclization removes both termini from enzymatic attack. The Pro-Pro kink already constrains the backbone, so a macrolactam constraining the RPKP turn should be geometrically feasible without disrupting the binding conformation. Given NK1R's CNS roles in pain and depression, a BBB-penetrant cyclic analog would dramatically expand therapeutic utility.
Why it matters
If a cyclic version retains the 0.41 nM affinity and gains CNS access, it would become a candidate for centrally acting NK1R antagonists addressing treatment-resistant depression or chronic neuropathic pain, areas of high unmet medical need.
Plausibility.40
Novelty.55
Impact.55
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence RPKPQQFFAL has free N- and C-termini that could be bridged; Pro2/Pro4 rigidity provides a geometric anchor for macrolactam design.
[2]
noteREADME notes the C-terminal Met-NH2 is absent, suggesting the C-terminus is already tolerant of modification, and that the compound is synthetic (not natural), indicating chemical engineering freedom.
[3]
structurepLDDT=69.1 indicates moderate backbone order; cyclization typically increases ordered structure and could raise predicted confidence.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table1 metrics
metricvaluetool
Ki 0.41 nM GPCRDB/ChEMBL
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde1.431global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Arg-Pro-Lys-Pro-Gln-Gln-Phe-Phe-Ala-Leu
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Substance P receptor-binding peptide (CHEMBL2370435) (pep-10451, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10451
@peptide{pep10451,
  sequence = {RPKPQQFFAL},
  target   = {tacr1},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {bioassayed}
}
related peptides 3 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 2 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use