pe
pep-10919 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Thymagen: Russian immune-support dipeptide (Glu-Trp / EW)

A tiny two-amino-acid peptide that helps regulate the immune system, derived from calf-thymus extracts; registered as a prescription drug in Russia since 1990, not approved in Western countries.

statuscomputed targetIMMUNE length2 aa refs1
snapshot clinical 0% confidence
Class
Synthetic immunomodulatory dipeptide; thymic bioregulator
Status
Registered prescription pharmaceutical in Russia since 1990 (IM injection, nasal spray, topical cream; immunocorrection indication). Not approved by FDA, EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, or TGA.
Best-supported effect
Reduced postoperative complications and restored immune parameters in elderly surgical patients (Russian double-blind placebo-controlled study); reduced acute respiratory infection morbidity in a Russian military cohort (intranasal and SC routes). Evidence is concentrated in the Khavinson program and Russian clinical network; no independent Western replication identified.
Main caveat
All human evidence originates from the Khavinson research program and Russian clinical network. Independent Western replication is essentially absent. Russian pharmaceutical registration is not equivalent to FDA or EMA approval. No Western-standard RCTs are indexed in major databases.
status 2 / 5
prediction metrics openfold3-mlx 0.3.1
ipTM0.861
pTM0.864
avg pLDDT59.9
ranking score0.908
STRUCTURE · PEP-10919 × IMMUNE
ranking0.908
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
openfold3-mlx 0.3.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence2 aa
12
EW
in the news 11 articles
overview readme

What this is

Thymagen (also marketed as Thymogen) is a synthetic two-amino-acid peptide — glutamic acid linked to tryptophan (Glu-Trp; single-letter EW) — that has been registered as a prescription immune-support pharmaceutical in Russia since 1990. It was identified by Vladimir Khavinson and Vladimir Morozov at the St. Petersburg Institute of Bioregulation and Gerontology as one of the active components of Thymalin, a calf-thymus peptide extract used in Soviet medicine, and then re-synthesized as a chemically defined drug. Both residues are the natural L-form: the mirror-image dipeptide (D-Glu-D-Trp, marketed in Russia as Thymodepressin) does the opposite — it suppresses the immune system rather than stimulating it — which is unusual in peptide pharmacology and makes stereochemical identity central to anything Thymagen does (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024). Thymagen is not approved by the FDA, EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, or TGA, and the great majority of its evidence base comes from a single Russian research program.

History

Khavinson and Morozov's group began work on a heterogeneous calf-thymus extract called Thymalin in the 1970s as part of a long-running Soviet program in "peptide bioregulators" — short peptides hypothesized to support tissue-specific function and counter age-related decline. In the 1980s the group fractionated Thymalin by reverse-phase HPLC and identified L-Glu-L-Trp as a principal immunostimulatory component, alongside a second active dipeptide L-Lys-L-Glu (KE, later marketed as Vilon). The synthetic L-Glu-L-Trp was registered with the Russian Ministry of Health in 1990 as Thymogen in three formulations: intramuscular injection, intranasal spray, and topical cream (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024). The chiral counterpart D-Glu-D-Trp was later developed as Thymodepressin and registered separately as an immunosuppressant. Thymagen sits in the same Khavinson "bioregulator" family as Epithalon (/card/pep-00008) and Pancragen (/card/pep-10935), with the same caveat: independent Western replication is essentially absent.

What it does

Thymagen is described as an immune-restoration drug — used in Russia to help bring depressed T-cell function back toward normal in older adults, post-surgical patients, and people with chronic infections. The proposed effects across published research are: pushing T-lymphocyte populations toward more mature, functional states; dampening over-active inflammatory signaling from monocytes and macrophages; supporting neutrophil chemotaxis and phagocytosis; and reducing the rate of acute respiratory infections when given as a nasal spray. The L-form stimulates these processes; the D-enantiomer reverses them, which is one of the more concrete pieces of evidence that the molecule is acting on a stereospecific target rather than as a generic amino-acid supplement (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024).

Evidence

  • Human: Russian clinical literature only; no Western RCTs are indexed in major databases. A clinical study in type 1 diabetes patients with secondary immunodeficiency reported activation of T-lymphocyte differentiation with clinical improvement in 94.4% and laboratory improvement in 83.3% of patients (Zhuk and Galenok, Terapevticheskii Arkhiv, 1996). A military-cohort study found that intranasal and subcutaneous Thymogen reduced the incidence, severity, and duration of acute respiratory viral infections in a training unit (Furgal and colleagues, Voenno-Meditsinskii Zhurnal, 1993). A double-blind placebo-controlled study in elderly post-surgical patients reported restored immune parameters and reduced postoperative complications; this study is described in the Russian-language literature but is not individually indexed in major Western databases.
  • Animal: A 12-month treatment study in 76 female rats reported that L-Glu-L-Trp (5 µg per rat, five times weekly) extended the maximum lifespan of the top 10% of animals to 1048 ± 21.1 days vs. 949 ± 16.1 days in controls (p < 0.001), reduced total spontaneous tumor incidence 1.5-fold, malignant tumors 1.7-fold, and hematopoietic malignancies (leukemias and lymphomas) 3.4-fold (Anisimov, Khavinson and Morozov, Biogerontology, 2000). No independent replication outside the Khavinson program has been identified.
  • In vitro: In the THP-1 monocyte/macrophage cell line, Thymogen (alongside other Khavinson peptides) inhibited LPS-induced expression of TNF and IL-6, reduced monocyte adhesion to activated endothelial cells, and was characterized as a natural inducer of TNF tolerance (Caputi and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022). Bioinformatic and cell-model analyses of the EW dipeptide in a COVID-19 inflammation context reported reduced expression of ACE2 and CYSLTR1 and reduction of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α synthesis by approximately 1.4- to 6.0-fold in LPS-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (Khavinson and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023; Khavinson and colleagues, Molecules, 2020).

Myths and misconceptions

  • "Russian registration since 1990 means Western-equivalent regulatory validation." It doesn't. Russian pharmaceutical registration reflects an internal regulatory verdict on Russian-generated data. It is not equivalent to FDA, EMA, MHRA, Health Canada, or TGA approval, which have different evidence requirements that have not been satisfied for this compound.
  • "Vladimir Khavinson won the Nobel Prize for the peptide bioregulator work that produced Thymagen." He did not. The attribution circulates online but is inaccurate.
  • "Research-chemical Thymagen is biologically equivalent to the Russian pharmaceutical." Stereochemical purity matters here more than for most peptides: the L-form is immunostimulatory and the D-form (Thymodepressin) is immunosuppressive (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024). Identity, purity, and sterility of non-pharmaceutical research-chemical supply cannot be assumed equivalent to a Russian pharmaceutical-grade product.
  • "It's only two amino acids, so it must be harmless." Molecular size doesn't establish safety. The dipeptide is reported to modulate immune-cell function and inflammatory gene expression — exactly the kind of activity that requires careful evaluation, particularly in autoimmune disease or in patients with subclinical malignancy.

Mechanism

The proposed mechanisms span several pathways, with different levels of independent confirmation.

T-cell differentiation support. Thymagen is reported to activate T-cell differentiation and enhance recognition of peptide–MHC complexes, supporting thymic immune function that declines with age (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024; Anisimov and colleagues, Biogerontology, 2000).

Cyclic-nucleotide modulation. The dipeptide is proposed to inhibit phosphodiesterase activity, raising intracellular cAMP and cGMP and altering immune-cell responsiveness. This pathway is described in the Khavinson literature and has not been independently re-derived outside that program.

Anti-inflammatory cytokine regulation. In THP-1 monocytes under LPS challenge, Thymogen inhibited TNF and IL-6 expression and reduced monocyte adhesion to LPS-activated HUVEC endothelial cells, behaving as an inducer of TNF tolerance (Caputi and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022). In a COVID-19-focused analysis, the EW peptide reduced ACE2 and CYSLTR1 expression and lowered IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α synthesis 1.4- to 6.0-fold in LPS-stimulated PBMCs (Khavinson and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023).

Proposed epigenetic mechanism. The Khavinson group has used molecular modeling to argue that L-Glu-L-Trp binds directly to DNA regulatory regions and histone H1/H3 proteins, altering chromatin accessibility for immune-related gene clusters (Khavinson and colleagues, Molecules, 2020). This hypothesis remains internal to the Khavinson program; no independent structural-biology or biochemistry replication has been identified.

Stereochemical evidence for a specific target. The L-enantiomer is immunostimulatory; the D-enantiomer (Thymodepressin) reverses these effects (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024). Reciprocal chiral activity is indirect but real evidence for a stereospecific molecular interaction, even though the receptor or binding partner has not been identified by independent methods.

The two-letter sequence stored on this card (EW) is a free, unmodified L-glutamyl-L-tryptophan dipeptide; the chirality at both residues is what matters most for the biology and is not visible from single-letter code alone.

Safety signals

Drawn from Russian clinical literature and from class-level considerations described in published sources. Independent Western pharmacovigilance has not been conducted.

  • Generally well tolerated across Russian clinical studies and over three decades of registered pharmaceutical use; no significant adverse effects reported in the available Russian literature. This real-world record has not been replicated under Western pharmacovigilance standards.
  • Rare individual hypersensitivity reactions described as possible; frequency not quantified to Western standards.
  • Stereochemical risk specific to this dipeptide: D-Glu-D-Trp has opposite, immunosuppressive activity (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024). Identity and stereochemical purity of non-pharmaceutical supply cannot be assumed.
  • Pregnancy and breastfeeding: no adequate reproductive toxicology data; use not recommended in available source guidance.
  • Active autoimmune disease: immunostimulation in this context is a theoretical concern; clinician evaluation needed.
  • Active or recent hematologic malignancy: immune-cell stimulation is a class-level concern in lymphoid malignancy contexts.
  • Formal pharmacokinetics (absorption, distribution, metabolism, clearance) have not been characterized in humans to Western standards.
  • Long-term cumulative-course safety has not been independently evaluated.

Regulatory status

  • Russia: Registered prescription pharmaceutical since 1990 in three formulations — intramuscular injection, intranasal spray, and topical cream — for immunocorrection indications. Russian Ministry of Health registration certificate №P N002408/01, reissued 2009 (Deigin and colleagues, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024).
  • United States (FDA): Not approved for any indication. Not recognized as a dietary supplement ingredient. Not on the FDA's list of peptides eligible for 503A pharmacy compounding. Sold through research-chemical suppliers not authorized for human use.
  • European Union (EMA): Not approved.
  • United Kingdom (MHRA): Not approved.
  • Canada (Health Canada): Not approved.
  • Australia (TGA): Not approved.
  • WADA: Not specifically named on the WADA Prohibited List. As a parenteral substance without governmental health-authority approval in most WADA-code jurisdictions, the S0 catch-all category is likely applicable for athletes outside Russia; status not independently refreshed in this card.

No Western-registry clinical trials for Thymagen, Thymogen, or L-Glu-L-Trp dipeptide were identified in this authoring pass; all identified human-study evidence originates from the Russian research context.

Open questions

  • Independent Western replication. Core efficacy and mechanistic claims have not been reproduced by Western or otherwise unaffiliated laboratories under modern controlled-trial methodology. This is the single largest gap.
  • Human pharmacokinetics. Absorption (especially across nasal mucosa), distribution, metabolism, and clearance have not been characterized to Western standards. Whether an unmodified dipeptide reaches target tissues at bioactive concentrations by any route is unknown.
  • Primary receptor or binding partner. The proposed direct DNA and histone binding by a dipeptide has not been independently confirmed by structural biology. The molecular target responsible for the L-vs-D enantiomer activity difference has not been identified by independent biochemistry.
  • Human translation of the rat lifespan and anti-tumor findings. The Anisimov 2000 rat result is from a single program and has no human-endpoint counterpart.
  • Cancer-promotion risk in susceptible populations. Immune stimulation in patients with subclinical malignancy is a class-level concern that available evidence does not adequately address.
  • Stereochemical purity verification in research-chemical supply. Given reciprocal L/D activity, the lack of identity and purity testing for non-pharmaceutical supply is a real biological risk, not a theoretical one.

Related peptides

  • Epithalon (AEDG) — pineal-derived tetrapeptide from the same Khavinson program, marketed as a longevity candidate.
  • Pancragen (KEDP) — pancreatic-tissue Khavinson tetrapeptide; the synthetic counterpart to the Suprefort extract.
  • Thymalin — the heterogeneous calf-thymus extract from which L-Glu-L-Trp was originally isolated (no platform card identified).
  • Vilon (Lys-Glu, KE) — the other principal immunostimulatory dipeptide isolated from Thymalin (no platform card identified).
  • Thymodepressin (D-Glu-D-Trp) — the chiral counterpart with opposite, immunosuppressive activity (no platform card identified).
  • Thymosin alpha-1 — independently developed thymic immunomodulator outside the Khavinson program (no platform card identified).
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does the dramatic difference between the two mirror forms of Thymagen prove it is locking onto a dedicated immune receptor rather than just being a nutrient?

If Thymagen has its own receptor, scientists could find that receptor and design much more powerful drugs to tune the immune system up or down, opening new treatments for infections, autoimmunity, and aging-related immune decline.

The hypothesis
The L-Glu-L-Trp versus D-Glu-D-Trp stereospecific reversal of immune effect in Thymagen/Thymodepressin arises from differential engagement of a chiral peptide-binding site on a thymic epithelial receptor, rather than from differences in proteolytic stability, indicating that the dipeptide acts as a true receptor ligand rather than a prodrug or nutrient signal.
Why it’s plausible
Most short dipeptides that influence immunity do so as nutrient signals (via PepT1/PepT2 transporters) or indirectly after hydrolysis to free amino acids. PepT transporters are largely stereochemistry-insensitive for small di/tripeptides. If the stereochemical reversal from immunostimulation to immunosuppression were mediated by differential hydrolysis rates or amino-acid release, one would expect a quantitative difference (faster/slower) not a qualitative sign reversal. A qualitative reversal requires that both enantiomers bind the same receptor but as agonist and inverse agonist or competitive antagonist, implying a chiral receptor binding site that recognizes backbone geometry.
Why it matters
Establishing that EW acts as a stereospecific receptor ligand rather than a nutrient/transport signal would provide the mechanistic rationale needed to identify the receptor, which is currently unknown, and would transform this from a folk-pharmacology dipeptide into a druggable GPCR or cytokine-receptor target.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.55
Impact.70
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteL-Glu-L-Trp stimulates immunity; D-Glu-D-Trp (Thymodepressin) suppresses immunity; readme calls this 'unusual in peptide pharmacology' and makes stereochemical identity central to the biology
[2]
paper
Two receptor types with different affinities were found on tumor-derived human T cell lines for the related thymic peptide thymulin, establishing precedent for a defined chiral receptor in the thymic peptide family
doi: 10.1517/14728220903512991
[3]
paper
Class A GPCR structural features; chiral ligand discrimination is a known property of GPCRs, supporting receptor-mediated rather than transport-mediated stereospecificity
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00086
openupdated 2026-06-05

In this tiny two-amino-acid drug, does one part do the binding and the other just hold it in the right shape?

Knowing which part of a dipeptide drug matters most lets chemists build a more stable version that might survive digestion and work as an oral pill rather than an injection or nasal spray.

The hypothesis
The tryptophan residue in EW acts as the pharmacophoric anchor through pi-stacking or hydrophobic burial in the receptor binding pocket, while the glutamic acid residue provides stereospecific backbone positioning rather than direct contact, predicting that N-methylation of the Glu backbone amide nitrogen would abolish activity regardless of chirality.
Why it’s plausible
Trp is one of the highest-information-content amino acids in receptor contacts due to its large indole ring capable of cation-pi, pi-pi, and hydrophobic interactions. In a two-residue peptide, each residue carries maximum weight. Glu provides a side-chain carboxylate that could form an ionic contact, but more importantly its backbone geometry sets the Trp ring angle relative to the binding surface. Stereospecific reversal by full D-conversion changes backbone dihedral angles globally, which is more consistent with backbone-positioning than side-chain contacts as the primary discriminator. N-methylation of Glu would rigidify the backbone between the two residues and test whether the interresidue geometry, rather than the Glu carboxylate, is the key determinant.
Why it matters
Identifying Trp as the pharmacophore would enable design of Trp-mimetic peptidomimetics with improved stability and oral bioavailability while preserving immunostimulatory activity.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.40
Impact.50
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceEW: only two residues, making each one essential; Trp (W) is the bulkiest, most ring-rich residue and the most frequently found at receptor binding interfaces in short peptide-receptor structures
[2]
paper
Peptidomimetic ligand synthesis insight into receptor relationships; backbone conformational constraints are a primary tool for identifying which residue provides the binding anchor in dipeptides
doi: 10.1021/jm960281e
[3]
sourceAtomic-level structure of small peptide interactions; nitrogen and oxygen atom positioning in dipeptide backbone contacts shown to be critical for receptor selectivity
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could the mirror-image form of this immune-boosting dipeptide safely calm overactive immune systems in diseases like rheumatoid arthritis?

Drugs that suppress the immune system in autoimmune disease often cause serious infections and organ damage. A dipeptide based on a natural immune signal might achieve the same suppression with far fewer side effects, helping patients with conditions like lupus or inflammatory bowel disease.

The hypothesis
Because D-Glu-D-Trp (Thymodepressin) suppresses immune activity, the EW stereo-pair constitutes a built-in immunosuppressant scaffold, and D-Glu-D-Trp may be effective in T-cell-driven autoimmune diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease) with a substantially lower side-effect burden than current small-molecule immunosuppressants due to its endogenous-mimicry mechanism.
Why it’s plausible
Current immunosuppressants (methotrexate, calcineurin inhibitors, JAK inhibitors) are not endogenous ligands and carry off-target toxicities from broad enzyme or receptor inhibition. If D-Glu-D-Trp suppresses via a physiological receptor-mediated pathway, it might suppress specifically the same T-cell populations that L-Glu-L-Trp stimulates, achieving selective immune modulation. The stereo-pair relationship means both agonism and antagonism of the same pathway are accessible from a single chemical scaffold, suggesting tight receptor specificity that limits off-target effects.
Why it matters
A non-toxic, potentially orally deliverable immunosuppressant dipeptide with an endogenous mechanistic basis would be transformative in autoimmune disease management, particularly in patients who cannot tolerate current agents.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.40
Impact.65
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
noteD-Glu-D-Trp marketed as Thymodepressin in Russia as an immunosuppressant; the stereo-pair logic implies shared receptor with opposite functional outcomes
[2]
sourceDipeptides can be completely resistant to proteolytic degradation under certain conditions; a D-amino acid dipeptide would be protease-resistant, providing longer duration of immunosuppression
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this peptide specifically target the T-cell part of the immune system, or does it affect all immune cells equally?

A drug that specifically boosts T cells without broadly activating the immune system could be used alongside vaccines in elderly or immunocompromised patients to make vaccines work better, without the risk of dangerous inflammatory side effects from non-selective immune stimulation.

The hypothesis
EW selectively modulates T-lymphocyte activity without affecting innate immune cells (neutrophils, macrophages) because the putative EW receptor is preferentially expressed on lymphoid versus myeloid lineages, a selectivity profile that would make it complementary rather than redundant to existing thymic peptides like thymosin alpha-1.
Why it’s plausible
Thymagen was identified as an active component of a thymic extract historically used to restore T-cell function in immunodeficient patients, implying a lymphocyte-selective action. Thymosin alpha-1 also acts primarily on T cells and dendritic cells. Innate immune cells are generally not governed by thymic peptide signaling pathways. If EW's receptor is restricted to T-cell progenitors and mature T cells, co-administration with innate-targeting immunostimulants (e.g., TLR agonists in vaccines) would produce orthogonal and potentially synergistic immune activation without redundancy.
Why it matters
T-cell selectivity would enable rational combination immunotherapy design, particularly for vaccine adjuvant applications and for immunosenescence where the T-cell arm is disproportionately depleted.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.35
Impact.55
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteEW identified as active component of Thymalin, a thymic extract used to restore T-cell function; historical indication is lymphocyte-selective
[2]
paper
Thymosin alpha-1 data showing lymphocyte-preferential activity patterns in immune-compromised patients; establishes that thymic dipeptides/peptides can have T-cell-selective mechanisms
doi: 10.2147/cmar.s555975
[3]
paper
Thymulin receptors found only on T-cell lines, not reported on myeloid cells; receptor distribution precedent in the thymic peptide family supports lymphoid selectivity
doi: 10.1517/14728220903512991
openupdated 2026-06-05

Can this tiny peptide, originally found in thymus tissue, help an elderly person's thymus produce new immune cells again?

As people age, their immune system runs out of fresh cells, leaving them vulnerable to new infections and less able to benefit from vaccines. A simple, stable dipeptide that reactivates the thymus could help older adults maintain stronger immunity, with far fewer side effects than current immune-boosting treatments.

The hypothesis
Thymagen (EW) could partially restore thymic output and naive T-cell diversity in elderly individuals by signaling through thymic epithelial cells that retain responsiveness to short peptide signals even after thymic involution, providing an immune-rejuvenation effect distinct from cytokine-based approaches.
Why it’s plausible
Thymic involution with aging reduces naive T-cell output, narrowing repertoire diversity and increasing susceptibility to novel pathogens and cancers. Exogenous thymic peptides (thymulin, thymosin alpha-1) have been explored as thymus-stimulating agents. EW was isolated from thymic extract alongside thymulin-related fractions, suggesting it may act on the same thymic epithelial cell signaling axis. Unlike thymulin (which requires zinc and a 9-residue sequence), EW's minimal size could allow it to penetrate thymic parenchyma more effectively after systemic administration, potentially acting on residual thymic epithelial cells that retain peptide-signal responsiveness.
Why it matters
Restoring even partial thymic output in aged individuals would have profound implications for vaccine efficacy, cancer immunosurveillance, and infection resistance, representing one of the largest potential impacts in geroscience.
Plausibility.40
Novelty.35
Impact.75
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteEW was identified by Khavinson and Morozov as an active component of Thymalin, a calf-thymus extract used for immune support; biological context is thymic epithelial cell signaling
[2]
paper
Thymulin receptors found on T cell lines; the thymic peptide receptor axis is established as a functional system, providing a pathway through which EW might act on the same cells
doi: 10.1517/14728220903512991
[3]
paper
Thymosin alpha-1 preclinical and clinical data in immunocompromised patients; establishes that thymic peptides can meaningfully modulate T-cell output in diseased and aged immune systems
doi: 10.2147/cmar.s555975
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.8608492612838745 openfold3-mlx
ranking score 0.9081118106842041 openfold3-mlx
structural qualityopenfold3
0
metricvaluenote
gpde0.418global PDE — lower = better
disorder0.093fraction disordered
chain pair ipTM (A, B)0.861interface quality
3-letter notation
Glu-Trp
recipeopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
parametervalue
modelopenfold3-mlx 0.3.1
weights
hardware
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategy
diffusion samples1
runtime78s
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-05-03
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Thymagen: Russian immune-support dipeptide (Glu-Trp / EW) (pep-10919, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10919
@peptide{pep10919,
  sequence = {EW},
  target   = {immune},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {computed}
}
related peptides 1 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-09
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-09; we'll re-check periodically
references 1 papers
[1] supporting
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use