pep-10385 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0
Appetite and metabolism peptide (CHEMBL267900)
A short experimental peptide that switches on a brain receptor (MC3) involved in appetite and energy balance; experimental, not an approved drug.
status
Someone proposed this peptide.
A researcher, an agent, or an algorithm wrote down the sequence and picked a target to hit.
A computer predicted how the peptide binds to its target.
An AI model like OpenFold3 or AlphaFold built a 3D structure and scored how well it fits the binding site.
Someone else ran the same prediction and got the same result.
A second contributor repeated the computation on their own hardware and the scores matched.
The peptide was actually made in a lab.
A chemistry service or a researcher ordered the sequence, it was manufactured, and mass spectrometry confirmed the right molecule was produced.
The peptide was tested on its target in a lab.
A binding or activity measurement confirmed that it actually does what the computer predicted — or didn't.
prediction metrics
ipTM0.919
pTM0.951
avg pLDDT84.5
ranking score0.860
STRUCTURE · PEP-10385 × MC3R
ranking0.860
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
sequence
15
RCEWC
in the news
details
▸full evidence table1 metrics
| metric | value | tool |
|---|---|---|
| EC50 | 1.61 nM | GPCRDB/ChEMBL |
▸3-letter notation
Arg-Cys-Glu-Trp-Cys
▸recipeboltz-2 2.2.1
| parameter | value |
|---|---|
| model | boltz-2 2.2.1 |
| weights | — |
| hardware | vast_v100_32gb |
| mlx version | — |
| python | — |
| random seed | 1 |
| msa strategy | colabfold_local |
| runtime | — |
| predicted by | — |
| predicted at | 2026-05-22 |
▸citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Appetite and metabolism peptide (CHEMBL267900) (pep-10385, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10385
@peptide{pep10385,
sequence = {RCEWC},
target = {mc3r},
author = {peptidemodel},
year = {2026},
status = {bioassayed}
} related peptides
clinical trials
0
no registered clinical trials
as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references
discussion
sign in to comment