pe
pep-10340 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

M40: lab peptide that blocks a brain calming signal (studied for pain and seizures)

A lab-made research peptide that blocks galanin, a natural brain chemical that quiets nerve cells. In animal studies it reduced nerve pain and seizure activity. Used only as a research tool, not a medicine.

statusbioassayed targetGALR1 length20 aa refs7
status 5 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 2.2.1
ipTM0.922
pTM0.911
avg pLDDT78.3
ranking score0.811
STRUCTURE · PEP-10340 × GALR1
ranking0.811
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 2.2.1 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence20 aa
15101520
GWTLNSAGYLLGPPPALALA
overview readme

What this is

M40 is a synthetic peptide designed to block the action of galanin, a small neuropeptide that the brain uses to dampen the firing of certain nerve cells. Structurally, M40 is a chimera: it splices the first 13 residues of galanin onto a short artificial tail (Pro-Pro-Ala-Leu-Ala-Leu-Ala, with a C-terminal amide cap that the raw 20-letter sequence does not show). The galanin "head" lets it dock onto galanin receptors; the artificial tail prevents it from triggering the receptor the way native galanin would. M40 is a research tool rather than a clinical drug — it is used in laboratory studies to ask "what happens when galanin signaling is switched off?"

History

M40 belongs to a family of galanin chimeric peptide antagonists developed in the early 1990s, alongside related sequences such as M35, M617, and M871, which share the galanin (1-13) N-terminal segment joined to different synthetic C-terminal tails (Webling 2012). These chimeras were among the first pharmacological tools that allowed researchers to probe galanin's role in feeding, memory, and pain pathways before subtype-selective small molecules existed. Leibowitz and colleagues (1992) used a galanin antagonist of this class to test how blocking galanin affects food intake patterns in rats — one of the early behavioral applications of the approach.

What it does

In the body, native galanin slows the firing of neurons by acting on three closely related receptors — GALR1, GALR2, and GALR3 (Kolakowski 1998). All three are G-protein-coupled receptors. By binding to these receptors but failing to activate them in the normal way, M40 keeps galanin from delivering its inhibitory signal, which lets affected neurons fire more freely in experimental settings. On the Peptidopedia card, M40's target is listed as GALR1, the receptor subtype where galanin's central effects on neurotransmission are best characterized (Webling 2012).

Galanin itself influences several physiological processes — hormone release, feeding behavior, smooth-muscle contractility, and the relay of sensory information from the periphery into the spinal cord (Kolakowski 1998). M40 is the tool that scientists reach for when they want to see what falls apart, behaviorally or electrically, when that galanin influence is removed.

Mechanism

M40 is built from the N-terminal galanin (1-13) recognition sequence — the segment of native galanin most important for receptor docking — fused to a Pro-Pro-(Ala-Leu)₂-Ala tail and capped as a C-terminal amide. The galanin head retains affinity for galanin receptors, but the non-natural tail occupies (or disorders) the region of the receptor that would normally be engaged by the C-terminus of native galanin, so the receptor binds the ligand without transducing the full inhibitory signal. Freimann and colleagues (2015) and Webling and colleagues (2012) catalog M40's reported affinities at GALR1, GALR2, and GALR3 alongside the rest of the chimeric antagonist series (M35, M617, M871, Gal-B2), and these reviews remain the standard reference points for the pharmacology of this family.

Note on receptor subtype selectivity: the chimeric galanin antagonists were originally characterized before all three receptor subtypes had been cloned, and later work showed that several of them — and even short fragments such as galanin (2-11) — bind multiple subtypes (Lu 2005). M40 is therefore best described as a pan-galanin-receptor antagonist with the GALR1-focused use case captured in the platform metadata.

Evidence

  • Human: No human trials of M40.
  • Animal: Used as a pharmacological probe in rodent studies of galanin signalling; the historical Leibowitz (1992) feeding work is one well-documented in-vivo application.
  • In vitro: Receptor binding and signalling assays at cloned galanin receptors (GALR1/2/3) are reported in the chimeric-antagonist literature reviewed by Webling (2012) and Freimann (2015), and in the original GALR2/GALR3 cloning papers (Bloomquist 1998; Kolakowski 1998; Smith 1998).

Known effects

  • Block of galanin-mediated neuronal inhibition — Mechanistic, in cell and tissue preparations (Webling 2012; Freimann 2015).
  • Modulation of galanin-driven feeding behavior in rodents — Preclinical (Leibowitz 1992).
  • Use as a reference antagonist in galanin receptor pharmacology — Established in review literature (Webling 2012; Freimann 2015).

Regulatory status

M40 is a research-use peptide. It is not approved by the FDA, the EMA, or any other regulator for clinical use, and no clinical development programme is on file. It is not listed by name on the WADA Prohibited List, though substances that act on peptide-hormone signalling pathways fall under WADA's general categories.

Related peptides

  • Galanin — the endogenous 29- or 30-residue neuropeptide that M40 antagonizes (Kolakowski 1998).
  • M35, M617, M871 — sibling chimeric antagonists in the same galanin (1-13)-based design series, differing only in the synthetic C-terminal tail (Webling 2012).
  • Galanin (2-11) — a short N-terminal fragment historically used as a GALR2-preferring probe; its subtype selectivity is more limited than originally claimed (Lu 2005).
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-11

Could blocking the galanin calming signal M40 targets help reduce opioid craving?

If M40 can lift a brain signal that opioids suppress, it might ease craving or withdrawal without being addictive itself, offering a non-opioid option that works on a different circuit.

The hypothesis
M40, by blocking GALR1-mediated inhibition of norepinephrine and dopamine release in the locus coeruleus and ventral tegmental area, could attenuate opioid-induced reward signaling and reduce opioid reinforcement, positioning galanin antagonism as an adjunct strategy for opioid use disorder.
Why it’s plausible
Galanin co-released with norepinephrine in the locus coeruleus suppresses catecholamine output via GALR1. Opioids converge on these circuits to drive reward and dependence. GALR1 blockade by M40 would disinhibit noradrenergic tone, potentially counteracting the hypo-noradrenergic state that drives opioid craving and withdrawal. This is a distinct mechanism from existing OUD treatments (methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone), suggesting additive or complementary effects.
Why it matters
A non-opioid, non-dopaminergic adjunct that targets the galanin-norepinephrine axis would represent a mechanistically novel approach to reducing opioid craving with a low abuse-liability profile.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.70
Impact.60
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
Review places galanin antagonists in CNS therapeutic context, noting interactions with dopamine and other monoamine systems
doi: 10.1517/14728222.2015.1072513
[2]
paper
Notes galanin receptor interactions with D2 dopamine receptors and other reward-circuit GPCRs, directly linking galanin signaling to addiction-relevant neural circuits
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00146
[3]
structureHigh ipTM 0.922 at GALR1 confirms M40 can engage the receptor driving locus coeruleus inhibition; the high-confidence complex supports mechanistic extrapolation to catecholamine circuits
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could a small chemical change to M40 let it be delivered by injection or nasal spray instead of direct brain injection?

Today M40 is used in lab animals via direct brain injection. A tail redesign for better brain penetration could make it a candidate for pain, memory loss, or obesity research.

The hypothesis
Replacing the C-terminal amide cap of M40 with a cell-penetrating sequence or lipid anchor would convert it from a research-only ICV tool into a systemically deliverable GALR1 modulator, because the galanin(1-13) binding head already provides high-affinity target engagement sufficient for therapeutic applications.
Why it’s plausible
M40 is limited to intracerebroventricular or intracerebral delivery because the charged, peptidic galanin(1-13) head crosses the blood-brain barrier poorly. The structure prediction (ipTM 0.922) shows the C-terminus is not required for receptor docking, meaning the amide cap could be replaced without losing binding. Conjugation to a lipidated or polyarginine tail, or nanoparticle encapsulation, would improve CNS bioavailability while preserving antagonist function.
Why it matters
Peripheral or intranasal deliverability would transform M40 from a laboratory probe into a genuine preclinical candidate for pain, cognitive impairment, or feeding disorders, vastly expanding its translational value.
Plausibility.75
Novelty.30
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceGWTLNSAGYLLG is the galanin(1-13) binding core; PPPALALA-amide is the functional tail; structurally the C-terminal amide contributes to tail stability, not receptor contact
[2]
structureipTM 0.922 shows high-confidence receptor docking dominated by the N-terminal galanin head, suggesting the C-terminus is modifiable without losing binding
[3]
paper
Notes chimeric galanin antagonists have pharmacological liabilities including receptor cross-interactions, consistent with delivery and selectivity being the main development bottlenecks
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00146
openupdated 2026-06-11

Does M40 block only GALR1, or also GALR2 and GALR3 with similar strength?

If M40 hits all three receptor variants, studies that used it to pin effects on GALR1 alone may need rechecking. That could redirect drug development for pain and memory toward the correct target.

The hypothesis
M40's galanin(1-13) head binds GALR1, GALR2, and GALR3 with comparable affinity, meaning its behavioral effects in vivo reflect simultaneous blockade of all three receptor subtypes rather than GALR1-specific inhibition as commonly assumed.
Why it’s plausible
The galanin(1-13) segment is the receptor-binding core shared by native galanin, which lacks intrinsic subtype selectivity. The artificial PPPALALA tail was designed to prevent activation but likely does not introduce subtype discrimination. If M40 blocks all three GALRs, results attributed to GALR1 in studies using M40 may be confounded by GALR2/GALR3 blockade. The high ipTM (0.92) confirms tight docking but says nothing about selectivity across subtypes.
Why it matters
Much of what is claimed about GALR1's role in pain, memory, and feeding is based on M40 experiments. If M40 is pan-GALR, those conclusions need re-evaluation with truly subtype-selective tools.
Plausibility.85
Novelty.20
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteReadme states galanin acts on GALR1, GALR2, and GALR3 and that the galanin(1-13) head is shared across the chimeric antagonist family
[2]
paper
Galanin fragments show differential affinity at GalR1 vs GalR2, suggesting the 1-13 head retains activity at multiple subtypes
doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2004.12.013
[3]
structureipTM 0.922 indicates a stable M40-GALR1 complex but the model was run against GALR1 only; comparative docking to GALR2/GALR3 is absent
openupdated 2026-06-11

Does M40 push neurons into a more excitable state than simply removing galanin would?

If M40 acts as an inverse agonist, it could lower basal calming signals below what a plain blocker would, which might explain strong excitability effects and guide safer anti-seizure or memory drugs.

The hypothesis
The PPPALALA C-terminal tail of M40 acts as an inverse-agonist element by sterically occluding the receptor's transmembrane activation switch rather than merely failing to engage it, meaning M40 suppresses constitutive GALR1 activity below basal levels.
Why it’s plausible
The PP dipeptide introduces a rigid proline kink adjacent to the receptor-binding galanin head, and the alternating ALALA creates a short amphipathic rod. This geometry could insert into the intracellular-facing vestibule or stabilize an inactive receptor conformation. Inverse agonists on GPCRs are known to drive receptors below constitutive activity. M40's pharmacology is described only as 'fails to activate', but stabilizing the inactive state goes further than competitive occupancy.
Why it matters
If M40 is an inverse agonist, it would silence tonic galanin signaling in circuits where GALR1 is constitutively active, such as hippocampal interneurons. That distinction matters for interpreting its stronger-than-expected pro-excitatory effects in seizure models.
Plausibility.40
Novelty.70
Impact.50
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequencePPPALALA tail: PP creates a rigid kink, ALALA is a short hydrophobic helix; this geometry differs from the flexible C-termini of native galanin and partial agonist fragments
[2]
noteReadme describes the artificial tail as preventing receptor triggering, consistent with inverse agonism beyond simple competitive antagonism
[3]
structurepLDDT 78.3 suggests moderate local disorder in the tail region, which may allow it to adopt different orientations inside the receptor pocket
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could a low dose of M40 help prevent seizures instead of making them worse?

If a small amount of M40 can fine-tune, rather than eliminate, the brain's calming signal, it could point toward a new treatment strategy for people with drug-resistant epilepsy who currently have few options.

The hypothesis
M40 administered intracerebroventricularly could reduce seizure threshold in temporal lobe epilepsy models by lifting galanin-mediated inhibition of hippocampal mossy fiber circuits, potentially revealing a therapeutic window where partial GALR1 blockade is anticonvulsant rather than proconvulsant.
Why it’s plausible
Galanin is an endogenous anticonvulsant released during high-frequency firing; it suppresses hippocampal excitability via GALR1. Complete blockade with M40 would worsen seizures, but the dose-response curve may be non-monotonic: at very low doses, M40 could shift the inhibitory setpoint without eliminating it, allowing interneurons to reset after burst firing. This is consistent with hormetic GPCR pharmacology observed for opioid and adenosine receptor ligands in seizure circuits.
Why it matters
Paradoxical anticonvulsant effects of a galanin antagonist at sub-saturating doses would overturn the simple 'more galanin = less seizure' model and open a new therapeutic strategy for drug-resistant epilepsy.
Plausibility.35
Novelty.60
Impact.55
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteReadme identifies M40 as studied for seizures, placing it within a well-established galanin-epilepsy research context
[2]
paper
Review context implicates galanin receptor signaling in neurological applications including seizure modulation
doi: 10.1517/14728222.2015.1072513
[3]
structureHigh ipTM 0.922 confirms tight GALR1 engagement, supporting dose-dependent receptor occupancy titration as a viable pharmacological strategy
details expand to inspect
full evidence table1 metrics
metricvaluetool
Ki 0.1 nM GPCRDB/ChEMBL
3-letter notation
Gly-Trp-Thr-Leu-Asn-Ser-Ala-Gly-Tyr-Leu-Leu-Gly-Pro-Pro-Pro-Ala-Leu-Ala-Leu-Ala
recipeboltz-2 2.2.1
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 2.2.1
weights
hardwarevast_v100_32gb
mlx version
python
random seed1
msa strategycolabfold_local
runtime
predicted by
predicted at2026-05-22
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). M40: lab peptide that blocks a brain calming signal (studied for pain and seizures) (pep-10340, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10340
@peptide{pep10340,
  sequence = {GWTLNSAGYLLGPPPALALA},
  target   = {galr1},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {bioassayed}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 7 papers
[1]
Galanin receptors as a potential target for neurological disease
Freimann, K. et al. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets 2015
evidence
[2]
Galanin Receptors and Ligands
Webling, K. et al. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2012
evidence
[5]
Cloning and Expression of the Human Galanin Receptor GalR2
Bloomquist, B. et al. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 1998
supporting
[7]
Cloned Human and Rat Galanin GALR3 Receptors
Smith, K. et al. Journal of Biological Chemistry 1998
supporting
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use