pe
pep-05318 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Aegerolysin anticancer peptide

An experimental peptide studied for its ability to fight cancer cells; not an approved drug.

statuscomputed targetANTICANCER length49 aa refs3
anticancer
EARLY ENTRY This candidate is newly indexed — supporting evidence is still being added. Have a paper or data point? Contribute below.
status 2 / 5 · 2 contributors
prediction metrics boltz-2 2.2.1
ipTM0.000
pTM0.434
avg pLDDT60.0
ranking score0.567
STRUCTURE · PEP-05318 × ANTICANCER
ranking0.567
?
RECEPTOR UNKNOWN
peptide conformation only · no target structure
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
sequence49 aa
15101520253035404549
MDSNKDE RAYAQWV IIILHNV GSSPFKI ANLGLSW GKLYADG NKDKEVY
in the news 27 articles
Hypotheses3 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

What if this peptide kills cancer cells by latching onto fats in the cell membrane rather than the protein locks that most cancer drugs try to fit?

If true, the entire way researchers study and develop this peptide would need to change, using membrane-fat assays instead of the standard protein-docking approach. It would also place pep-05318 in a different competitive landscape from conventional protein-targeted cancer peptides.

The hypothesis
The annotated target 'anticancer' is non-specific; the actual molecular target of pep-05318 is a lipid-phase receptor (ceramide-1-phosphate or raft-associated GM3 ganglioside) rather than a protein receptor, making protein-docking predictions irrelevant for explaining its bioactivity.
Why it’s plausible
The current card annotates the target only as the generic label 'anticancer', which is a phenotype, not a molecular target. Aegerolysin family members are among the rare proteins for which lipid species, not protein partners, are the primary binding determinants. The low interface confidence in the boltz-2 monomer run (iptm is null, ptm 0.43) is consistent with the absence of a protein binding partner in the prediction input. Misdirected protein-receptor docking studies would fail to uncover why this peptide is active, while lipid array or membrane-competition assays would.
Why it matters
Correctly identifying a lipid target changes the entire drug-target profiling approach for pep-05318 and defines a distinct competitive landscape from conventional receptor-targeted anticancer peptides.
Plausibility.47
Novelty.52
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
structureiptm is null and ptm is only 0.43, consistent with a peptide whose bioactivity does not involve a protein-protein interface captured in monomer prediction.
[2]
sequenceSequence encodes no canonical protein-binding motifs (RGD, NGR, etc.) but features hydrophobic segments typical of lipid-intercalating domains.
[3]
paper
Reference describes food-protein-derived anticancer peptides acting on cell-surface components rather than classical protein receptors.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.087
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could connecting the two loose ends of this peptide into a closed loop stop the body from breaking it down so fast?

Linear peptides like this one typically fall apart in the bloodstream within two to thirty minutes, which makes them nearly impossible to use as drugs. If cyclizing pep-05318 extends that window while keeping its cancer-cell-killing ability intact, it could become a realistic candidate for testing in animals and eventually in people.

The hypothesis
Cyclization of pep-05318 via head-to-tail lactam bond between M1 and Y49 will improve proteolytic half-life beyond the 2-30 minute range typical of linear peptides while preserving membrane-lytic activity, because cyclization constrains the hydrophobic core geometry without disrupting the bilayer-inserting segments.
Why it’s plausible
The half-life axis hits confirm that unmodified linear peptides have typical serum half-lives of 2-30 minutes. The N-terminus (M) and C-terminus (Y) of pep-05318 are both non-charged residues and reside in flexible regions flanking the hydrophobic interior segments, making a head-to-tail cyclization chemically feasible without steric clash with the functional membrane-inserting domains. Literature on short cationic anticancer peptides (cited in the potency axis) specifically demonstrates that head-to-tail cyclization improves anticancer potency and stability. At 49 residues, a full macrolactam ring can close without prohibitive ring strain.
Why it matters
A cyclic analogue with extended half-life would be a viable lead for in vivo testing, directly addressing the key pharmacokinetic liability of this peptide class and enabling systemic administration routes.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.27
Impact.62
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
Head-to-tail cyclization of short cationic anticancer peptides improved anticancer potency (Torfoss et al., cited in potency axis).
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b02025
[2]
sourceSerum half-life of unmodified linear peptides estimated at 2-30 minutes, establishing the baseline that cyclization must improve upon.
[3]
sequenceTerminal residues M1 and Y49 flank the hydrophobic core; their positional flexibility supports macrolactam ring closure without disrupting membrane-active segments WVIIILH and LGLSW.
openupdated 2026-06-05

What if instead of jamming a biological signal, this peptide simply punches holes in the outer wall of cancer cells until they collapse?

If pep-05318 works by rupturing the membrane directly, it could explain why it hits a broad range of cancer types, and it would be much harder for cancer cells to evolve resistance against than drugs that target a single protein. For patients, that could mean a treatment that stays effective longer and covers more cancer variants.

The hypothesis
Pep-05318 exerts anticancer activity primarily through direct disruption of cancer cell plasma membranes rather than receptor-mediated apoptosis, driven by its dual hydrophobic segments (WVIIILH and LGLSW) inserting into the lipid bilayer.
Why it’s plausible
The sequence contains two distinct hydrophobic stretches (residues 14-20 and 33-37) flanked by charged residues, a hallmark of pore-forming peptide topology. The aegerolysin family is known for membrane-binding and pore formation in cholesterol- or ceramide-rich membranes. The low structural confidence (avg_plddt 60.0) is consistent with a peptide that is disordered in solution but adopts a defined conformation upon membrane contact. Cancer cells overexpress phosphatidylserine and ceramide-1-phosphate on their outer leaflet, providing a selective membrane target. If this mechanism holds, the peptide should lyse cells without requiring any intracellular target.
Why it matters
Establishing a membrane-lytic rather than receptor-mediated mechanism would explain a broad-spectrum anticancer profile and resistance to target-based drug resistance, and would frame rational engineering efforts around amphipathicity rather than binding-site complementarity.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.27
Impact.72
Basis · grounding2 papers · 2 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceDual hydrophobic segments WVIIILH (positions ~14-20) and LGLSW (positions ~33-37) flanked by charged/polar residues, consistent with a membrane-inserting amphipathic topology.
[2]
structureLow avg_plddt of 60.0 and ptm of 0.43 indicate disorder in solution, typical of membrane-active peptides that fold on contact with lipid bilayers.
[3]
paper
Reference covers anticancer peptide mechanisms including membrane disruption pathways.
doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2022.110194
[4]
paper
Hydrophobicity plays a crucial mechanistic role in anticancer peptide action against cancer cells.
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-10-0811
details expand to inspect
full evidence table1 metrics
metricvaluetool
ranking score 0.5667165517807007 boltz-2
3-letter notation
Met-Asp-Ser-Asn-Lys-Asp-Glu-Arg-Ala-Tyr-Ala-Gln-Trp-Val-Ile-Ile-Ile-Leu-His-Asn-Val-Gly-Ser-Ser-Pro-Phe-Lys-Ile-Ala-Asn-Leu-Gly-Leu-Ser-Trp-Gly-Lys-Leu-Tyr-Ala-Asp-Gly-Asn-Lys-Asp-Lys-Glu-Val-Tyr
recipeboltz-2 2.2.1
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 2.2.1
weights
hardwarevast_v100_32gb
mlx version
python
random seed1
msa strategynone_monomer
runtime
predicted by
predicted at2026-05-23
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Aegerolysin anticancer peptide (pep-05318, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-05318
@peptide{pep05318,
  sequence = {MDSNKDERAYAQWVIIILHNVGSSPFKIANLGLSWGKLYADGNKDKEVY},
  target   = {anticancer},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {computed}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
references 3 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use