pe
pep-04477 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Urotensin-2: most powerful blood-vessel-narrowing peptide in the human body

A natural peptide made mainly in the kidneys and spinal cord that powerfully tightens blood vessels and affects the heart; used as a research tool to study cardiovascular disease.

statusbioassayed targetUTS2R length11 aa refs2
endogenous
status 2 / 5 · 0 verified on platform
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.928
pTM0.791
avg pLDDT72.2
ranking score0.763
STRUCTURE · PEP-04477 × UTS2R
ranking0.763
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence11 aa
151011
ETPDCFWKYCV
overview readme

What this is

Urotensin-II (U-II) is a small cyclic peptide produced naturally in the human body — primarily in the kidneys and spinal cord — that acts on blood vessels and the heart. It is best known as the most potent mammalian vasoconstrictor yet identified, meaning it narrows blood vessels more powerfully than any other peptide of its kind, including endothelin-1 (Ames and colleagues, Nature, 1999). Despite originating from a gene called UTS2, it is structurally unrelated to most vasoactive peptides; it instead belongs to a family first discovered in fish decades before its human form was recognized.

The stored sequence ETPDCFWKYCV represents the 11-residue human form. Critically, the peptide's biological activity depends on a disulfide bridge linking the two cysteine residues (positions 5 and 10 of this sequence), which creates a cyclic hexapeptide ring — the C-terminal CFWKYC loop — that is the essential pharmacophore. This ring structure is not visible in the flat linear sequence but is indispensable for receptor binding (Merlino and colleagues, Journal of Amino Acids, 2013).

History

Urotensin-II was first characterized in the 1960s from the urophysis — a neuroendocrine gland at the tail of the teleost fish Gillichthys mirabilis — where it was studied for its role in salt and water balance (Merlino and colleagues, 2013). Its sequence from goby fish was published in 1980 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, revealing structural resemblance to the hormone somatostatin.

For two decades, U-II was regarded as a fish neuropeptide with uncertain relevance to human physiology. That changed in 1999 when Ames and colleagues (Nature, 1999) identified the human form of the peptide and matched it to an "orphan" G-protein-coupled receptor — one whose ligand had previously been unknown — called GPR14. When human U-II was applied to isolated primate arteries, it caused vasoconstriction approximately ten times more potent than endothelin-1, which had until then been the benchmark for potent mammalian vasoconstrictors. This discovery prompted a wave of research into whether U-II plays a role in cardiovascular diseases.

A related peptide, urotensin-II-related peptide (URP), was subsequently identified in rat brain by Sugo and colleagues (Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2003). URP shares the same conserved C-terminal CFWKYC ring and binds the UT receptor with comparable affinity, but has a distinct N-terminal sequence and is expressed predominantly in gonads and placenta rather than the cardiovascular system (Castel and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2017).

What it does

U-II acts primarily on the UT receptor (also called GPR14, encoded by the UTS2R gene) to produce powerful constriction of large blood vessels and increase the force of heart contractions. Its cardiovascular effects are context-dependent: in large primate arteries it is a potent vasoconstrictor, while in small resistance vessels it can instead trigger vasodilation through nitric oxide release from the inner vessel lining (Zhu and colleagues, British Journal of Pharmacology, 2006).

Beyond the vasculature, U-II stimulates the growth of vascular smooth muscle cells, promotes fibrosis in the heart, and has neuromodulatory activity in the brainstem and spinal cord — where it increases arousal and motor activity when given centrally in animal models (Maguire and Davenport, 2002).

Evidence

  • Human: Plasma U-II is detectably elevated in patients with congestive heart failure, renal failure, and atherosclerosis compared with healthy controls, though results across studies are inconsistent (Zhu and colleagues, 2006; Russell, Vascular Health and Risk Management, 2008). In forearm infusion experiments in humans, U-II produced dose-dependent reductions in blood flow, confirming physiological vasoconstrictor activity in vivo (Maguire and Davenport, 2002). No registered clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov have tested U-II as a therapeutic agent.
  • Animal: Chronic U-II infusion in rats increased left ventricular collagen deposition (fibrosis) and impaired contractility (Zhu and colleagues, 2006). In rat models of arterial restenosis following balloon angioplasty, the UT receptor antagonist SB-611812 reduced the intima-to-media ratio by approximately 60%, suggesting the U-II/UT axis drives pathological vessel remodelling (Zhu and colleagues, 2006). In rodent kidneys, intravenous U-II infusion increased renal blood flow and sodium excretion through a nitric oxide-dependent mechanism (Zhu and colleagues, 2006).
  • In vitro: U-II contracts isolated arterial rings with an EC50 below 1 nM in primate tissue, roughly ten times more potent than endothelin-1 (Merlino and colleagues, 2013). In isolated human right atrial trabeculae, U-II increased contractile force with an EC50 of approximately 0.3 nM — compared with approximately 3.0 nM for endothelin-1 under the same conditions — and, unlike endothelin-1, did not cause arrhythmias or prolong relaxation (Maguire and Davenport, 2002). U-II also drives proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells through synergistic signalling with oxidized LDL and serotonin (Zhu and colleagues, 2006).

Known effects

  • Vasoconstriction (large arteries) — Demonstrated in primate and human tissue in vitro; forearm blood-flow reduction confirmed in human subjects (Maguire and Davenport, 2002)
  • Positive inotropy (heart) — Increased contractile force in isolated human atrial muscle (Maguire and Davenport, 2002)
  • Vasodilation (small resistance vessels) — Endothelium-dependent, nitric oxide-mediated; demonstrated in rat mesenteric and renal arteries (Zhu and colleagues, 2006)
  • Vascular smooth muscle proliferation — Preclinical; proposed contributor to atherosclerosis and restenosis (Zhu and colleagues, 2006)
  • Cardiac fibrosis — Preclinical (rat model); increased collagen deposition with chronic infusion (Zhu and colleagues, 2006)
  • Renal sodium/water handling — Increased glomerular filtration rate and urinary sodium excretion in rat models; nitric oxide-dependent (Zhu and colleagues, 2006)
  • Central nervous system activity — Neuromodulatory; increased rearing, grooming, and motor activity following intracerebroventricular administration in animals (Maguire and Davenport, 2002)

Safety signals

U-II is an endogenous peptide and has not been developed as a therapeutic drug. No clinical safety data from controlled human trials exists. Elevated circulating U-II has been observed — variably — in heart failure, renal failure, hypertension, atherosclerosis, and type-2 diabetes, though whether elevated U-II is a cause or a consequence of these conditions remains unresolved (Zhu and colleagues, 2006; Tsoukas and colleagues, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 2011). Measurement of plasma U-II is complicated by a roughly 1,000-fold variation in reported values across different assay methodologies, making cross-study comparisons difficult (Zhu and colleagues, 2006).

Regulatory status

  • US: Not approved by the FDA; not a registered drug or biologic.
  • EU: Not approved by the EMA.
  • WADA: Not listed on the WADA prohibited list.
  • Research status: Active area of preclinical investigation; UT receptor antagonists (including palosuran and SB-706375) have been evaluated in animal models but none has advanced to approved drug status as of 2026 (Tsoukas and colleagues, 2011).

Mechanism

U-II binds the UT receptor — a Class A (rhodopsin-family) G-protein-coupled receptor encoded by UTS2R on chromosome 17q25.3 — primarily through the conserved C-terminal CFWKYC ring, with the Trp-Lys-Tyr triad being particularly critical for receptor engagement (Merlino and colleagues, 2013). The receptor activates multiple downstream pathways depending on tissue context (Castel and colleagues, 2017):

  • Gq/PLC/IP₃/Ca²⁺: The predominant vasoconstrictor pathway; phospholipase C activation releases calcium from intracellular stores and opens L-type calcium channels, driving smooth muscle contraction.
  • Gα₁₃/Rho/ROCK: Rho kinase activation increases calcium sensitivity of contractile proteins, sustaining and amplifying contraction without requiring further calcium influx.
  • ERK/MAPK: Mediates the mitogenic effects on vascular smooth muscle cells — proliferation and hypertrophy — that underlie the proposed role in atherosclerosis and restenosis.
  • Gi/o and nitric oxide (endothelium): In endothelial cells, UT receptor activation couples to nitric oxide synthase, producing vasodilation that opposes smooth muscle constriction. This pathway dominates in small resistance vessels, explaining the paradoxical vasodilatory responses seen in some vascular beds.

The UT receptor shares structural features with chemokine receptors, including a conserved proline at position 2.58 in transmembrane domain 2 that creates a kink influencing ligand-binding geometry (Castel and colleagues, 2017). U-II binds in a pseudo-irreversible manner with slow dissociation, which prolongs receptor activation and contributes to the sustained nature of its vasoconstrictive responses.

Related peptides

  • Urotensin-II-related peptide (URP) — Paralog sharing the C-terminal CFWKYC pharmacophore; identified in rat brain (Sugo and colleagues, 2003); predominantly expressed in gonads and placenta; binds the same UT receptor with similar affinity.
  • Somatostatin (/card/pep-04430) — Structurally homologous cyclic peptide; the UT receptor belongs to the same GPCR superfamily as somatostatin receptors. Note: the pep-04430 link should be verified against the platform before publishing.
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-11

Does the dangling N-terminal part of urotensin-II change which internal signal the receptor sends, not just whether it binds?

If true, doctors could design drugs that block only the harmful vessel-narrowing signal while leaving beneficial heart-protective signals intact, reducing side effects in people with heart failure or high blood pressure.

The hypothesis
The N-terminal tail (ETP, residues 1-3) of human urotensin-II acts as an allosteric modulator of receptor activation efficacy rather than a binding affinity determinant, such that the cyclic CFWKYC ring governs receptor occupancy while the tail biases signaling toward specific G-protein subtypes (Gq vs Gi).
Why it’s plausible
The readme confirms the CFWKYC ring is the essential pharmacophore for binding, yet the full 11-mer is the endogenous ligand. The ETP tail is unlikely to be evolutionary noise. Biased agonism at GPCRs often involves receptor regions outside the core binding pocket. The high ipTM (0.928) indicates a well-defined complex, suggesting the tail makes ordered contacts that could couple to signaling bias.
Why it matters
If the N-terminal tail biases signaling, truncated ring-only analogs and the full 11-mer have different downstream effects in vascular and cardiac tissue, explaining divergent pathophysiology data and enabling design of pathway-selective UTS2R agonists or antagonists.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.65
Impact.70
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteThe CFWKYC ring is described as the essential pharmacophore; the ETP N-terminal flanking sequence is present in the endogenous 11-mer but its functional role is not specified.
[2]
structureipTM = 0.928 indicates high-confidence complex structure, implying ordered contacts from the full peptide including the N-terminal region.
[3]
sequenceSequence ETPDCFWKYCV: residues E1-T2-P3-D4 precede the disulfide-constrained ring C5-F6-W7-K8-Y9-C10; V11 flanks the ring on the C-terminal side.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could urotensin-II released by diseased kidneys travel to the heart and directly cause the scarring that kills people with kidney disease?

If so, a single drug blocking urotensin-II could protect both the blood vessels and the heart muscle in kidney disease patients, potentially reducing the number one cause of death in that group.

The hypothesis
Circulating urotensin-II levels in patients with chronic kidney disease serve as a causal amplifier of cardiorenal syndrome progression rather than a secondary biomarker, such that kidney-origin U-II directly drives myocardial fibrosis and hypertrophy through UTS2R on cardiac fibroblasts, independent of its hemodynamic vasoconstriction.
Why it’s plausible
U-II is produced in the kidneys and is one of the most potent vasoconstrictors known. Elevated U-II has been observed in CKD patients. UTS2R is expressed on cardiac fibroblasts, not only vascular smooth muscle. Direct pro-fibrotic Gq/RhoA signaling is a known driver of cardiac remodeling. If U-II acts directly on fibroblasts rather than only through hemodynamic load, it constitutes a molecular bridge between renal dysfunction and cardiac injury not currently targeted.
Why it matters
If renal U-II directly causes heart scarring, a UTS2R antagonist would be uniquely beneficial in CKD patients by simultaneously reducing vascular resistance and preventing cardiac fibrosis, two major causes of death in this population.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.55
Impact.75
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
noteU-II is described as produced primarily in the kidneys, placing the kidney as source organ and the heart as a potential downstream target.
[2]
paper
Quantitative PCR showed prepro-URP and prepro-UII genes expressed across multiple peripheral and central tissues in humans and rats, confirming broad target tissue distribution.
doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2003.09.102
[3]
paper
Review covering UTS2R (GPR14) signaling breadth, supporting receptor presence in non-vascular cell types.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00076
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could urotensin-II tighten blood vessels in the heart but have a different or opposite effect in the kidneys?

If confirmed, this would explain why urotensin-II studies have given conflicting results and could open a path to drugs targeting only the harmful vessel narrowing without disrupting kidney function in patients with cardiovascular disease.

The hypothesis
Urotensin-II shows tissue-selective vasoconstriction because UTS2R coupling to Gq versus beta-arrestin pathways is differentially distributed between renal and coronary vascular smooth muscle, leading to vasoconstrictive responses at low peptide concentrations in coronary vessels but vasodilatory or null responses in some renal arterioles at the same concentrations.
Why it’s plausible
UTS2 is expressed in kidneys yet the peptide is the strongest vasoconstrictor known. Paradoxical vasodilation by U-II has been reported in some vascular beds. Tissue-specific GPCR coupling repertoires and receptor-effector stoichiometry are well established. The moderate pLDDT (72.2) on the complex may reflect inherent structural flexibility consistent with pluripotent signaling.
Why it matters
Tissue-selective signaling would explain the confusing literature where U-II raises blood pressure in some assays but not others, and it would make UTS2R a viable drug target provided tissue-selective modulators can be engineered.
Plausibility.80
Novelty.40
Impact.65
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteU-II is described as produced in kidneys and spinal cord and as the most potent mammalian vasoconstrictor, yet its vasoactive effects in different vascular beds are not uniform per established pharmacology literature.
[2]
paper
Review referencing GPR14/UTS2R signaling context and the 1999 discovery of U-II acting on GPR14, supporting a rich receptor pharmacology.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00076
[3]
structurepLDDT = 72.2 (moderate) indicates flexible regions consistent with a receptor-peptide complex capable of adopting multiple active conformations.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Urotensin-II is already known to activate two somatostatin receptors (sst2 and sst5) because the two peptides share a ring shape. Do some of its brain and hormone effects actually come from those receptors rather than its own receptor?

If part of urotensin-II's nervous-system action runs through somatostatin receptors, then some effects now blamed on its main receptor would need rethinking, and analogs could be useful in tumors that carry many somatostatin receptors.

The hypothesis
The structural homology between the CFWKYC ring of urotensin-II and the cyclic core of somatostatin enables cross-binding to somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5) at pharmacologically relevant concentrations, contributing to the peptide's observed central nervous system and endocrine effects independent of UTS2R.
Why it’s plausible
The readme explicitly notes structural resemblance to somatostatin, which is itself a cyclic disulfide-bridged peptide with a FWKT pharmacophore. Both peptides share key aromatic residues (F, W, Y) within the ring. Somatostatin receptors are widely expressed in brain, pituitary, and spinal cord, overlapping UTS2 expression sites. Cross-reactivity would directly reinterpret current receptor attribution for CNS effects.
Why it matters
If U-II engages SSTRs, its documented neuroendocrine actions may not require UTS2R at all, invalidating current attribution of all U-II effects to a single receptor and suggesting repurposing opportunities for U-II analogs in SSTR-expressing tumors like carcinoids.
Plausibility.85
Novelty.25
Impact.70
Basis · grounding2 computed/notes
[1]
noteREADME states goby fish sequence revealed structural resemblance to the hormone somatostatin, indicating a conserved structural relationship between the two cyclic peptides.
[2]
sequenceCFWKYC ring contains F6, W7, Y9 aromatic residues in a disulfide-constrained loop, closely mirroring somatostatin's FWKT pharmacophore in a cyclic Cys-Cys scaffold.
openupdated 2026-06-11

Could replacing the fragile sulfur bridge in urotensin-II with a stronger chemical link make a drug that stays active in damaged, inflamed heart tissue?

People with heart failure or clogged arteries have high levels of chemicals that break down sulfur bonds, so a tougher version of this peptide could work more reliably in exactly the patients who need treatment most.

The hypothesis
Replacing the disulfide bridge in the CFWKYC ring with a lactam (amide) bridge between a lysine and an aspartate engineered into positions 5 and 10 would produce a redox-stable urotensin-II analog that retains full UTS2R potency but resists inactivation in the oxidative environment of atherosclerotic or ischemic tissues.
Why it’s plausible
The disulfide bond is the structural core of U-II activity, but disulfide bonds are vulnerable to reduction in thiol-rich milieu of ischemic heart muscle and atherosclerotic plaques (high glutathione). Lactam-bridged analogs of somatostatin and other cyclic peptides are established as redox-stable replacements. K8 within the ring could anchor a redesigned lactam bridge. The high-confidence ipTM (0.928) implies the receptor accommodates the ring geometry well, suggesting tolerance for ring modifications.
Why it matters
A redox-stable U-II antagonist would maintain receptor blockade in diseased cardiovascular tissue where ordinary disulfide-containing analogs degrade prematurely, making it a more reliable therapeutic in the very patients who need it most.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.45
Impact.60
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteBiological activity explicitly depends on the disulfide bridge between C5 and C10; the ring is described as the pharmacophore, making bridge integrity central to function.
[2]
sequenceSequence positions 5 and 10 are cysteines; K8 within the ring provides a potential anchor for a lactam bridge in a redesigned analog.
[3]
structureipTM = 0.928 indicates high confidence receptor complementarity, suggesting the binding pocket tolerates the cyclic ring geometry independent of specific bridge chemistry.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.9282427430152893 boltz-2
ranking score 0.7634943723678589 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde1.259global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Glu-Thr-Pro-Asp-Cys-Phe-Trp-Lys-Tyr-Cys-Val
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Urotensin-2: most powerful blood-vessel-narrowing peptide in the human body (pep-04477, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-04477
@peptide{pep04477,
  sequence = {ETPDCFWKYCV},
  target   = {uts2r},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {bioassayed}
}
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 2 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use