pe
pep-10957 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Brain-protecting research peptide (GK-2)

A lab-made dipeptide that mimics nerve growth factor to protect brain cells; studied in animal models of stroke and brain injury; experimental, not an approved drug.

statusdesigned target? length2 aa refs4
status 1 / 5
sequence2 aa
12
GK
overview readme

Snapshot

Class: NGF mimetic dipeptide
Evidence tier: Animal-only evidence
Status: Not approved in any jurisdiction; preclinical research compound only
Best-supported effect: Neuroprotective activity in rodent models of stroke, traumatic brain injury, and Parkinson's-like lesions (animal studies, single research program)
Main caveat: No completed Western-published human trials; virtually all pharmacology originates from one Russian research group; independent replication is limited


What this is

GK-2 is a synthetic dimeric dipeptide designed to mimic the fourth beta-turn loop of nerve growth factor (NGF) — the region of the protein that contacts the TrkA receptor. It was developed by the medicinal chemistry group of Tatiana Gudasheva and Sergei Seredenin at the V.V. Zakusov Research Institute of Pharmacology (Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow). The design goal was to reproduce NGF's neurotrophic and neuroprotective signaling in a small, drug-like molecule while avoiding the hyperalgesia — pain sensitization — that has limited full-length recombinant NGF as a clinical drug candidate. In published animal work, GK-2 activates the TrkA receptor and downstream survival pathways and shows protective effects in rodent models of ischemia, Parkinsonism, amyloid toxicity, and depression. It is not an approved medicine in any jurisdiction and is not in published Western clinical trials.


Evidence map

Evidence layerGradeWhat it supports
HumanNoneNo human trial data is present
AnimalModerateNeuroprotective effects in rodent stroke, traumatic brain injury, MPTP-induced parkinsonism, Alzheimer's-relevant amyloid, and forced-swim depression models; most studies originate from a single Russian research program — independent replication outside that lineage is limited
In vitroModerateTrkA phosphorylation, PI3K/Akt and MAPK activation, and neuroprotective properties in cell-based assays
ComputationalNone identifiedNo docking, structure prediction, or design-scoring data are identified
MechanismPlausibleTrkA-biased dipeptide mimetic concept is chemically coherent and supported by receptor activation and downstream signaling data in cell and animal systems; mechanism not validated in human tissue

The evidence base is substantially concentrated in the Gudasheva and Seredenin laboratory at the Zakusov Institute. Independent reproduction in Western or non-affiliated groups is limited. This is a material limitation of the current evidence base and is reflected in the confidence rating throughout this card.


Claim check

ClaimVerdictEvidence layerConfidence
Neuroprotection in rodent models of stroke and traumatic brain injurySupported (animal)AnimalMedium — multiple published studies, but single research program; no independent Western replication
Neuroprotection or disease modification in human stroke or TBINot establishedHumanLow — no human trial data present
Parkinson's-like neurodegeneration protection in animal modelsSupported (animal)AnimalMedium — rodent MPTP model data from the same research program; single-lab limitation applies
Antidepressant-like effects in animal modelsSupported (animal)AnimalMedium — forced-swim and related behavioral paradigms; single-lab limitation applies
TrkA-selective activation without p75NTR-mediated hyperalgesiaSupported (in vitro / animal)In vitro / animalMedium — proposed on the basis of receptor selectivity assays and absence of pain-sensitization in rodent work; not validated in human cells or primate pain models
Cognitive improvement or Alzheimer's disease treatment in humansNot establishedHumanLow — no human trial data present

Experimental exposure

This section reports exposure used in published animal experiments. It does not establish human dosing.

ContextSystemExperimental exposureDurationEndpointLimitation
Rodent stroke model (cerebral ischemia)RatsLow milligram-per-kilogram doses, intraperitoneal or intravenous; exact dose values not individually extractedStudy-specific acute or subacute periodNeurogenesis, synaptogenesis, histological and behavioral neuroprotection markersAnimal model only; human translation not established; single research program
Rodent traumatic brain injury modelRatsParenteral route (IP or IV); exact dose not individually extractedStudy-specificBehavioral and neuroprotective endpointsAnimal model only; human translation not established
Rodent MPTP parkinsonism modelRats or miceParenteral route; exact dose not individually extractedStudy-specificDopaminergic lesion endpointsAnimal model only; human translation not established
Cell-based neuroprotection assaysNeuronal or related cell linesConcentration range not individually extractedAssay-specificCell survival and TrkA activation markersIn vitro only; does not establish systemic exposure

Preclinical safety signals

SignalSystemNotes
Human side-effect profileNot characterizedNo completed human trials present, human adverse-event profile is unknown
TrkA signaling — oncology concernTheoretical (source-noted)TrkA contributes to proliferation in some tumor types including TrkA-expressing neuroblastoma and certain adult cancers; formal carcinogenicity and tumor-promotion studies in susceptible animal models are described as absent from the public literature
p75NTR engagementPreclinical / assayLower p75NTR activation relative to full-length NGF is a claimed property; extent and clinical implications in humans are not characterized
Research-chemical supply qualityNot a clinical compoundGK-2 is not available as pharmaceutical-grade material; supply chain quality and purity are not pharmaceutical-regulated
Long-term safetyNot characterizedChronic animal toxicology and human safety data are absent from the available literature

Regulatory status

Region / bodyStatusNotes
USNot approvedNot FDA-approved; not a controlled substance; not a recognized dietary supplement ingredient; not available as a compounded medicine; regarded as a preclinical research compound
EUNot approvedPer available sources, no approved status in the European Union
RussiaNot approvedPer available sources, GK-2 is not registered as a medicine in Russia; other compounds from the broader Gudasheva dipeptide-mimetic program have moved toward Russian clinical evaluation, but GK-2 has not
UK, Canada, AustraliaNot approvedPer available sources, no approved status in these jurisdictions
WADAper available sources: likely prohibited under S0GK-2 is not listed by name on the WADA Prohibited List as reported by source; however, WADA's S0 category prohibits any substance not currently approved by a governmental regulatory authority for human therapeutic use — a description that applies to GK-2; current WADA list status not independently refreshed in this card

No approved therapeutic status is identified for any jurisdiction.


Mechanism

GK-2 is a dimeric dipeptide — two monosuccinyl-glutamyl-lysine units joined by a hexamethylenediamine linker — modeled on the fourth beta-turn loop of NGF. This loop is the region of the NGF protein most directly associated with TrkA receptor contact. In cell and animal studies from the Gudasheva and Seredenin laboratory, GK-2 engages TrkA, promotes its phosphorylation, and activates the downstream PI3K/Akt and Ras/MAPK survival pathways that characterize full-length NGF signaling.

The central mechanistic claim is that GK-2 is biased toward TrkA over p75NTR engagement. Full-length NGF activates both receptors; p75NTR activation is implicated in NGF-induced hyperalgesia in peripheral tissue. The proposed selective TrkA bias is the pharmacological basis for the argument that GK-2 can deliver NGF-like neuroprotective signaling without the pain sensitization that has complicated clinical development of recombinant NGF.

Both TrkA bias and downstream neuroprotective signaling are characterized in vitro and in rodent models. The mechanism has not been validated in human tissue, human neurons, or primate pain models, and target selectivity has not been independently confirmed outside the originating research program.


Chemistry

FieldValue
Structure typeDimeric dipeptide
Design basisSynthetic mimetic of the fourth beta-turn loop of nerve growth factor (NGF)
Monomer unitMonosuccinyl-L-glutamyl-L-lysine
LinkerHexamethylenediamine
TopologyTwo monosuccinyl-glutamyl-lysine fragments joined via hexamethylenediamine linker
Amino-acid count4 residues total (2 Glu + 2 Lys across two fragments)
Full systematic nameHexamethylenediamide of bis-(N-monosuccinyl-L-glutamyl-L-lysine)
Sequence confidenceNeeds review — no primary sequence record independently verified in this card

No molecular weight, formula, CAS number, or sequence string in standard single-letter or three-letter notation was individually extracted from the available literature.


Open questions

  • Human pharmacology: No human pharmacokinetic, tolerability, or efficacy data are available. The most urgent gap is a basic Phase I characterization — whether GK-2 reaches the brain, what its half-life is, and whether it is tolerated in humans at all.
  • Independent replication: Virtually all published pharmacology originates from the Gudasheva and Seredenin laboratory at the Zakusov Institute. Replication by independent Western groups or non-affiliated Russian groups is limited and is a fundamental requirement before the preclinical record can be treated as broadly credible.
  • TrkA selectivity in human models: The p75NTR-sparing argument — which is the central selling point for the no-hyperalgesia claim — has not been rigorously tested in human cells or in primate pain models. This is a key gap between the mechanism hypothesis and a human-relevant safety claim.
  • Long-term oncology safety: TrkA signaling contributes to proliferation in neuroblastoma and some adult cancers. Formal carcinogenicity and tumor-promotion studies in susceptible models are absent from the public literature.
  • Route and formulation: All published animal work uses intraperitoneal or intravenous parenteral dosing. No validated oral, intranasal, or other patient-friendly route has been published.
  • Comparative effectiveness: Direct comparisons of GK-2 versus other neurotrophic-mimetic candidates (Cerebrolysin, Dihexa, Semax, P21, GSB-106) in shared preclinical paradigms are sparse, making relative efficacy difficult to assess.
Hypotheses4 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does GK-2 miss the pain-causing nerve cells because those cells have their receptors too far apart for the small double-armed molecule to grab both at once?

Nerve growth factor drugs have been stuck in development for Alzheimer's because they cause severe pain. If GK-2 is naturally selective for brain cells over pain cells because of how its two arms are spaced, it could be developed into a safe Alzheimer's therapy without the pain liability that has stopped its predecessors.

The hypothesis
GK-2, unlike full-length NGF, does not activate TrkA on peripheral nociceptive neurons because its dimeric structure cannot bridge the larger inter-receptor spacing on small-diameter C-fiber sensory neurons where TrkA is organized in lower-density clusters, while the denser TrkA clustering on CNS neurons and larger DRG neurons enables productive bivalent engagement.
Why it’s plausible
Full-length NGF binds TrkA with nanomolar affinity on peripheral nociceptors and causes hyperalgesia through sensitization of TRPV1 and Nav1.8. The density of TrkA on the plasma membrane varies significantly by cell type: CNS neurons and large myelinated sensory neurons have higher TrkA cluster density than small unmyelinated C-fibers. A small symmetric dimer with a fixed inter-arm distance (set by the hexamethylene linker in GSB-106; likely similar for GK-2) would require a minimum receptor density to productively bridge two TrkA chains. If C-fiber TrkA spacing exceeds the dimer's reach, GK-2 would be functionally inactive on these cells while remaining active on CNS targets. This provides a mechanistic explanation for the absence of reported hyperalgesia with GK-2.
Why it matters
If verified, this receptor-density selectivity mechanism would be a novel principle for designing CNS-selective TrkA agonists that avoid the pain-sensitizing peripheral side effect that has blocked full NGF from clinical use in Alzheimer's disease for decades.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.80
Impact.80
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteGK-2 was specifically designed to avoid the hyperalgesia that limited full NGF as a clinical candidate, the mechanism of this selectivity is unstated and represents a knowledge gap.
[2]
paper
Cerebellar granule neuron (CGN) survival data in culture indicate CNS neuronal TrkA populations are responsive to GK-2 at concentrations consistent with receptor engagement.
doi: 10.3109/00207454.2014.935376
[3]
sourceCross-reactivity with neuropeptide GPCRs is stated to be unlikely based on sequence motif analysis, focusing the selectivity question on the kinase receptor family specifically.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is glycine in GK-2 necessary because it is the only amino acid that can bend in exactly the right way to position the active lysine for receptor contact?

Understanding why each amino acid in GK-2 is necessary, or replaceable, guides chemists in building improved versions. If glycine turns out to be irreplaceable, it tells developers exactly what any modified version must keep, saving years of trial and error in drug optimization.

The hypothesis
The glycine residue in GK-2 is functionally non-redundant: it serves as a conformational hinge that allows the lysine to adopt the precise dihedral angles needed for TrkA contact, and substituting glycine with any L-amino acid (including alanine) will abolish activity by restricting the phi/psi space accessible to the adjacent lysine.
Why it’s plausible
Glycine is unique in having no side chain, allowing it to adopt phi/psi angles in all four quadrants of the Ramachandran plot. In a type-I or type-II beta-turn, glycine frequently occupies the i+2 position precisely because other amino acids cannot access the required positive phi angles. In a GK dipeptide, glycine at position 1 acts as the turn initiator and allows the following lysine to adopt the extended conformation needed for receptor contact. Any L-alpha-amino acid at position 1 would impose a steric constraint on the Gly-Lys backbone, altering the lysine rotamer population. This is a sharp, experimentally accessible SAR prediction: Ala-Lys dimer should be inactive or significantly less potent than Gly-Lys dimer.
Why it matters
If glycine's conformational role is confirmed, it establishes a hard constraint on peptidomimetic development: replacements for GK must preserve this hinge function, ruling out many otherwise attractive modifications. It also explains why a seemingly arbitrary two-residue sequence is biologically active while nearby sequences are not.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.50
Impact.50
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceGK is Gly-Lys. Glycine's unique Ramachandran freedom is structurally relevant to any beta-turn mimicry role; no other amino acid can replace it while maintaining the same backbone geometry.
[2]
noteGK-2 is designed to mimic the fourth beta-turn loop of NGF; beta-turns have strict stereochemical requirements at each position, making glycine's presence at position 1 likely functionally constrained.
[3]
sourceProteolytic stability design rationale is discussed; glycine's susceptibility to aminopeptidases is a known liability for Gly-containing peptides, so its retention despite this liability suggests a functional necessity.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does GK-2 protect brain cells from Alzheimer's-related damage by activating a survival pathway that switches off the enzyme responsible for creating the toxic tau tangles seen in the disease?

If confirmed, GK-2 could be combined with existing anti-amyloid drugs to attack Alzheimer's from two directions at once, potentially slowing the disease more effectively than either approach alone. This would matter for the 50 million people worldwide living with Alzheimer's and the families caring for them.

The hypothesis
GK-2 suppresses amyloid-beta oligomer toxicity in hippocampal neurons through TrkA-PI3K-Akt phosphorylation of tau at Ser9 of GSK-3beta (inactivation of GSK-3beta), thereby reducing tau hyperphosphorylation downstream of amyloid toxicity, making GK-2 relevant to Alzheimer's disease through a mechanism distinct from amyloid clearance.
Why it’s plausible
Amyloid-beta oligomers activate GSK-3beta in neurons, leading to tau hyperphosphorylation and neurofibrillary tangle formation. TrkA-PI3K-Akt signaling phosphorylates and inactivates GSK-3beta at Ser9, directly opposing this cascade. Full NGF has been shown to reduce tau phosphorylation through this pathway in rodent Alzheimer's models, but its clinical development is blocked by hyperalgesia and delivery challenges. GK-2, if it activates TrkA-PI3K-Akt in hippocampal neurons, would be predicted to reduce GSK-3beta activity and hence tau phosphorylation. The readme notes protection against amyloid toxicity in rodent models, consistent with this mechanism.
Why it matters
Current Alzheimer's disease drugs targeting amyloid (lecanemab, donanemab) address only the upstream lesion. A TrkA-based approach that simultaneously reduces tau phosphorylation downstream would address a different node in the pathological cascade and could be combined with amyloid-clearing therapies for additive benefit.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.40
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteAmyloid toxicity protection is listed as a best-supported effect in rodent models, this is the direct empirical anchor for the hypothesis.
[2]
paper
Synaptogenesis recovery proportional to neuronal volume is reported, consistent with downstream protection of synaptic integrity that would follow GSK-3beta inactivation.
doi: 10.32607/20758251-2019-11-3-31-37
[3]
sourceThe challenge of translating preclinical neuroprotection to clinical Alzheimer's trials is directly noted, underscoring the significance of identifying the mechanism before clinical translation.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is the positive charge on GK-2's lysine amino acid the essential feature that allows this tiny two-residue peptide to activate the TrkA receptor normally switched on by full nerve growth factor?

If true, scientists could design extremely simple, cheap molecules that mimic nerve growth factor by carrying just the right charge, without the complex structure of the full protein. This would lower costs and speed up the development of drugs for nerve damage and Alzheimer's disease.

The hypothesis
GK-2 engages the TrkA receptor's domain 5 (Ig-like C2 loop 2, d5) through a beta-turn mimicry mechanism in which the glycine-lysine dipeptide, in its dimeric form, presents a cationic lysine side chain that mimics the Arg-Lys-Thr basic patch of the NGF fourth beta-turn loop contacting TrkA, and receptor activation requires this specific charge geometry rather than extended backbone contacts.
Why it’s plausible
The NGF fourth beta-turn loop (residues 100-104: Lys-Gly-Lys-Glu-Val or similar depending on species) contacts TrkA d5 primarily through basic residue interactions. GK-2's dimeric form presents two lysine residues symmetrically, mimicking the basic patch on both NGF protomers that contact the TrkA dimer. The glycine provides backbone flexibility to allow the lysine to adopt the required rotamer. If the charge of the lysine side chain is neutralized (e.g., by acetylation), activity should be abolished, a strong, falsifiable prediction. This is more specific than saying GK-2 simply mimics a loop.
Why it matters
Establishing that a two-residue basic-charge motif is sufficient to activate TrkA would represent the minimal pharmacophore for this receptor tyrosine kinase and would radically simplify the design of NGF-replacement drugs for Alzheimer's disease and peripheral neuropathy, where full-length NGF causes dose-limiting hyperalgesia.
Plausibility.40
Novelty.60
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
noteGK-2 mimics the fourth beta-turn loop of NGF that contacts TrkA; designed to reproduce TrkA activation while avoiding the hyperalgesia associated with full NGF.
[2]
paper
PSD-95 postsynaptic marker changes in GK-2-treated cultures scale with neuronal volume recovery, consistent with genuine synaptic TrkA downstream signaling rather than non-receptor membrane effect.
doi: 10.32607/20758251-2019-11-3-31-37
[3]
sequenceGK is 2 residues: glycine (flexible, no charge) and lysine (positively charged side chain at physiological pH); the basic charge is the dominant chemical feature available for receptor contact.
details expand to inspect
3-letter notation
Gly-Lys
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Brain-protecting research peptide (GK-2) (pep-10957, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10957
@peptide{pep10957,
  sequence = {GK},
  target   = {},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {designed}
}
clinical trials 1 on ct.gov · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials ? 1
by phase
1no phase
by status
1completed
references 4 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use