pe
pep-10788 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Fertility hormone fragment that switches on the FSH receptor (FSH β 33: 53)

A small piece of the natural fertility hormone FSH that can partly switch on its own receptor by itself; used only as a lab research tool.

statussynthesized targetFSHR length21 aa refs6
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.742
pTM0.609
avg pLDDT73.8
ranking score0.739
STRUCTURE · PEP-10788 × FSHR
ranking0.739
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence21 aa
1510152021
YTRDLVY KDPARPN TQIVYNP
overview readme

What this is

FSH β-chain (33–53) is a 21-amino-acid fragment taken from positions 33 to 53 of the beta subunit of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), a pituitary hormone that drives egg and sperm development. The fragment was synthesised and studied to understand which part of FSH physically contacts its receptor, the FSH receptor (FSHR). It turned out to be one of the two principal receptor-binding segments of the FSH beta subunit — and it can activate that receptor partially on its own, without the rest of the FSH molecule (Santa Coloma, Dattatreyamurty, and Reichert, Biochemistry, 1990).

History

FSH had been known for decades to drive follicle development in women and spermatogenesis in men, but the specific surface of the hormone that docks onto FSHR was unclear. Early receptor-mapping work in the 1980s identified a short tetrapeptide, Thr-Arg-Asp-Leu (TRDL), within the beta subunit as a receptor-contact motif (Dattatreyamurty and colleagues, 1987). Expanding that lead, Santa Coloma, Dattatreyamurty, and Reichert synthesised the full 21-residue sequence spanning positions 33–53 of the FSH beta subunit and published the first characterisation of its receptor binding and biological activity in 1990. Their study confirmed the fragment binds FSHR and produces measurable biological effects — establishing it as a research tool for mapping hormone–receptor recognition. Subsequent work in 1992 showed that replacing the cysteine at position 51 with serine did not abolish binding inhibition, clarifying that the cysteine is not essential for receptor contact (Santa-Coloma, Crabb, and Reichert, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1992).

What it does

The fragment binds the FSH receptor and produces two opposing effects simultaneously: it weakly stimulates estradiol production in rat Sertoli cells at baseline, but reduces the response when full FSH is also present. In pharmacological terms this is partial agonism — the peptide activates the receptor, but not as strongly as intact FSH — combined with competitive partial antagonism (Santa Coloma and colleagues, Biochemistry, 1990). The Kd measured in that study was approximately 5.5 × 10⁻⁵ M, orders of magnitude weaker than native FSH, which reflects that the isolated fragment lacks the structural context provided by the full hormone. Researchers later showed that chemically linking this fragment with other FSH receptor-binding regions (from the alpha subunit and beta region 81–95) in a way that mimics their three-dimensional arrangement on the intact hormone raises potency substantially — demonstrating that the 33–53 segment is one component of a multi-contact recognition surface (Hage-van Noort and colleagues, PNAS, 1992).

Because FSHR is expressed on granulosa cells of the ovary and Sertoli cells of the testis in normal tissue, the fragment has also been used as a targeting vector for drug delivery. Zhang and colleagues (Cancer Research, 2009) conjugated the FSH β(33–53) peptide to paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles and demonstrated improved anti-tumour effects in ovarian carcinoma models in vivo compared with naked nanoparticles. A subsequent study fused the fragment with a cationic antimicrobial peptide (IIKK) to create FSH33-53-IIKK, which selectively killed FSHR-expressing prostate, cervical, and breast cancer cells in vitro and reduced tumour growth in xenograft models (Chen and colleagues, J Cancer, 2016). The logic of these applications rests on the finding that FSHR, normally restricted to gonadal cells, is also expressed on the endothelium of tumour blood vessels across at least 11 cancer types — while being absent in normal tissue more than 10 mm from the tumour (Radu and colleagues, New England Journal of Medicine, 2010).

Evidence

  • Human: No clinical trials. The peptide is a biochemical research tool and preclinical targeting vector; it has not entered human studies.
  • Animal: Paclitaxel nanoparticles conjugated to the FSH β(33–53) targeting sequence outperformed unconjugated paclitaxel nanoparticles in mouse ovarian carcinoma xenograft models (Zhang and colleagues, 2009). FSH33-53-IIKK fusion peptide reduced prostate cancer xenograft tumour volume in vivo (Chen and colleagues, 2016). Related FSHβ peptide fragments spanning overlapping regions promoted spermatogenesis and follicle development in prepubertal mice after a short treatment course (Fan and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2022).
  • In vitro: The fragment stimulates basal estradiol production and partially inhibits FSH-induced estradiol synthesis in rat Sertoli cell cultures (Santa Coloma and colleagues, 1990). FSHR-expressing cancer cell lines (prostate PC3, cervical HeLa, breast MCF7) are preferentially killed by FSH33-53-IIKK relative to FSHR-negative lines (Chen and colleagues, 2016).

Mechanism

FSH β(33–53) contacts the leucine-rich repeat (LRR) domain of the FSHR ectodomain. The core recognition motif appears to centre on the TRDL subdomain (residues 34–37), which was independently identified as capable of inhibiting FSH binding in the 1980s. The full 33–53 fragment encompasses this motif within a broader contact surface; circular dichroism and NMR analysis of the isolated peptide found approximately equal contributions from antiparallel beta-sheet and turn structures, with a small alpha-helical content, suggesting the fragment adopts a partially ordered conformation in solution relevant to receptor engagement. Receptor activation by the fragment — partial agonism — proceeds through Gαs-coupled cAMP signalling, the canonical FSHR pathway documented in Sertoli and granulosa cells (Gloaguen, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2011; Ulloa-Aguirre and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2018). The crystal structure of FSH in complex with the entire FSHR ectodomain, including the hinge region, was solved in 2012 and showed that the hinge region forms an integral part of the receptor's extracellular domain rather than a separate structural unit — providing structural context for how peptide fragments of FSH can engage a subset of receptor contacts (Jiang and colleagues, PNAS, 2012).

Known effects

  • FSHR binding — Documented; Kd ~5.5 × 10⁻⁵ M in radioligand assay (Santa Coloma and colleagues, 1990)
  • Partial agonist of basal estradiol synthesis — Preclinical (rat Sertoli cell model)
  • Partial antagonist of FSH-stimulated estradiol synthesis — Preclinical (rat Sertoli cell model)
  • Tumour-targeting ligand — Preclinical; validated in ovarian and prostate xenograft models as a nanoparticle/fusion-peptide guiding component

Open questions

  • No structural data on the fragment bound to FSHR in an atomic-resolution co-crystal; whether the solution conformation matches the receptor-bound conformation is unknown.
  • Potency as an isolated peptide is very low (micromolar Kd); no optimised analogue with improved affinity has been characterised in published literature.
  • Selectivity of FSHR-targeting payloads for tumour vasculature versus normal gonadal FSHR has not been fully characterised in humans.
  • The role of biased FSHR signalling — distinct Gαs, β-arrestin, and Gαi/o pathways recently described at this receptor (Landomiel and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2019) — has not been explored for this fragment specifically.
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Does the four-residue sequence TRDL physically shift the FSH receptor into a partly active shape when it binds?

If true, it could lead to miniature drug molecules that gently activate the FSH receptor, potentially offering a safer alternative to injected FSH in fertility treatments where the current drugs can cause dangerous over-stimulation of the ovaries.

The hypothesis
The TRDL motif within FSH β 33-53 (residues 1-4 of the fragment: YTRD) acts as a conformational trigger that stabilizes the FSHR leucine-rich repeat domain in an active-like orientation, rather than serving merely as a static contact patch, explaining why the isolated fragment retains partial agonist activity.
Why it’s plausible
The fragment achieves partial agonism without the intact FSH heterodimer context. The boltz-2 ipTM of 0.74 is notably high for a short linear peptide docking to a large glycoprotein receptor, suggesting a well-defined binding mode. The TRDL tetrapeptide was identified as the minimal receptor-contact motif (readme). Partial agonism from a fragment implies the bound pose induces some, but not full, receptor conformational change. The sulfated tyrosine hinge region literature (10.1073/pnas.1206643109) indicates that lifting the sTyr-harboring loop is a key activation step, and a fragment binding site overlapping this region could partially mimic that movement.
Why it matters
If TRDL acts as a conformational trigger rather than a passive anchor, then small molecules or stapled peptides mimicking only this tetrapeptide pharmacophore could serve as low-molecular-weight partial FSH agonists, useful in controlled ovarian stimulation where full agonism risks hyperstimulation syndrome.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.55
Impact.60
Basis · grounding1 paper · 3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceFragment begins YTRDLVYK: TRDL at positions 2-5 confirmed in sequence
[2]
structureboltz-2 ipTM=0.74, unusually high confidence for a 21aa linear peptide on a large GPCR-like receptor, consistent with a defined binding pose rather than nonspecific contact
[3]
noteFragment retains partial agonist activity and was synthesised to map FSHR contact surface; TRDL identified as minimal contact motif (Dattatreyamurty 1987)
[4]
paper
sTyr-harboring hinge loop is an inhibitory element; lifting it is a key activation step; constitutive FSHR mutant S273I lies on the preceding helix
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206643109
openupdated 2026-06-05

Do the final six residues of the fragment help it stick to the FSH receptor without contributing to actually activating it?

If the fragment has separable holding and activating parts, chemists could design stripped-down molecules that block the FSH receptor without switching it on, which could be useful in conditions like hormone-sensitive cancers where FSH receptor activation is harmful.

The hypothesis
The C-terminal polar cluster QIVYNP (residues 16-21 of the fragment) acts as a secondary receptor-docking anchor that increases binding dwell time without contributing to receptor activation, such that truncation to the N-terminal 15 residues (YTRDLVYKDPARPNT) reduces efficacy but not affinity proportionally.
Why it’s plausible
The readme notes that replacing Cys51 (which would map near the C-terminus of the fragment) with Ser did not abolish binding inhibition, indicating some C-terminal plasticity. The sequence QIVYNP contains polar and aromatic residues (Y, N) capable of hydrogen-bonding but the proline at position 21 would cap any helix extension. This is consistent with a C-terminal segment that anchors but does not trigger receptor response. The ipTM of 0.74 suggests the full 21-residue peptide achieves a stable pose, but the functional read-out is partial agonism, implying the activation-competent region may be shorter.
Why it matters
Dissecting affinity-contributing from efficacy-contributing sub-sequences within this fragment would define the minimal pharmacophore for FSHR partial agonism and could reveal a biased-agonism design principle: peptides that bind stably but activate weakly may serve as receptor-occupancy probes or antagonists in therapeutic contexts where FSH receptor blockade is desired.
Plausibility.55
Novelty.55
Impact.55
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceFull sequence YTRDLVYKDPARPNTQIVYNP; C-terminal QIVYNP contains Y19, N20, P21; proline at position 21 terminates potential helical extension
[2]
noteCys51 (near fragment C-terminus) replaceable with Ser without abolishing binding inhibition, implying C-terminal region tolerates substitution
[3]
structureipTM=0.74 for full 21-mer suggests defined complex; partial agonism of fragment implies activation and binding are dissociable
openupdated 2026-06-05

Can this partial FSH activator keep follicles alive at doses too low to cause overstimulation?

If true, it could offer women undergoing chemotherapy a gentler way to preserve their fertility, avoiding the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome risk that limits use of standard FSH-based fertility drugs in this vulnerable group.

The hypothesis
FSH β 33-53 partial agonism at FSHR is sufficient to support follicle survival signaling (anti-apoptotic pathway activation) in granulosa cells at doses below the threshold for ovulation induction, making it a candidate for fertility preservation rather than ovarian stimulation.
Why it’s plausible
FSHR signaling in granulosa cells has distinct dose-response windows: low-level activation supports follicle survival while high-level activation drives maturation and ovulation. A partial agonist with inherently submaximal efficacy (readme: fragment activates receptor partially) may naturally operate in the survival window. This is clinically relevant because fertility preservation in cancer patients requires maintaining the follicle pool without triggering premature ovulation during chemotherapy.
Why it matters
A weak, short-lived FSHR partial agonist derived from the natural hormone sequence would have a favorable safety profile for fertility preservation indications where current recombinant FSH doses carry ovarian hyperstimulation risk.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.60
Impact.65
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
FSH and FSHR biology directly relevant to in vitro fertilization and ovarian stimulation clinical context
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00148
[2]
noteFragment produces measurable biological effects at FSHR, described as partial activation without full FSH molecule
[3]
structureipTM=0.74 supports genuine receptor engagement rather than artifactual binding
openupdated 2026-06-05

If the fragment is chemically locked into a ring shape at the natural turn, does it become a stronger FSH receptor activator?

A more potent, longer-lasting version of this natural fragment could one day replace the complex injected FSH preparations used in fertility clinics, potentially as a simpler, more stable drug.

The hypothesis
Cyclisation of FSH β 33-53 via a lactam bridge between Lys8 (K) and Asp10 (D), which are three residues apart in the linear sequence, would constrain the DPARP turn geometry, increase FSHR binding affinity relative to the linear peptide, and shift partial agonism toward fuller efficacy by pre-organizing the receptor-contact conformation.
Why it’s plausible
The sequence YKDPARP (residues 7-13 of the fragment) contains a classic turn-prone DPARP segment where D and P together favor a beta-turn. K at position 8 and D at position 10 are ideally spaced for an i, i+2 lactam bridge that would lock the turn without grossly distorting the flanking strands. Constraining a receptor-binding loop commonly increases both affinity and efficacy for peptide ligands of glycoprotein hormone receptors, as demonstrated for LH analogs. The high ipTM of 0.74 for the linear peptide already suggests the turn is adopted in the bound state; pre-organizing it should reduce the entropic cost of binding.
Why it matters
A cyclised, protease-resistant analog of this natural FSHR-binding fragment would have longer plasma half-life and potentially higher potency than the parent, making it a more practical lead for fertility indications while retaining the natural-sequence selectivity profile.
Plausibility.45
Novelty.55
Impact.55
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
sequenceSequence positions 7-13: YKDPARP; K at pos 8 and D at pos 10 are i, i+2 for lactam cyclisation; DP and DPARP are strong turn-nucleating motifs
[2]
structureipTM=0.74 implies the turn geometry is already favored in the bound complex, suggesting pre-organization via cyclisation would reduce entropic penalty
[3]
noteFragment studied as a receptor-mapping tool; no constrained analog yet described, leaving engineering space open
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does this fragment exclusively activate the FSH receptor without accidentally triggering its close relatives, the LH and TSH receptors?

If the fragment is naturally selective, it could become a template for fertility drugs that do not cause thyroid or LH-pathway side effects, which is a known concern with some current fertility medications.

The hypothesis
FSH β 33-53 binds FSHR with measurable affinity but does not cross-activate the closely related luteinizing hormone receptor (LHCGR) or thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), because the TRDL motif contacts a receptor sub-site that diverges at key positions between glycoprotein hormone receptors.
Why it’s plausible
FSHR, LHCGR, and TSHR share the leucine-rich repeat ectodomain architecture and respond to structurally related heterodimeric hormones, raising the risk of cross-reactivity for any hormone fragment. However, structural differences in the hinge region between these receptors are documented (10.3389/fendo.2018.00707). A fragment that achieves partial agonism specifically at FSHR (readme) despite lacking the alpha-subunit that normally confers some cross-receptor binding selectivity must exploit contacts unique to FSHR in that region.
Why it matters
Confirming receptor selectivity for this short linear peptide would establish that the FSHR hinge region contains a peptide-accessible selectivity filter, opening a route to selective FSHR modulators without the broad glycoprotein hormone receptor cross-talk that complicates full FSH analog development.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.40
Impact.55
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
Structural differences in the hinge region of FSHR vs LHCGR vs TSHR documented, particularly around sulfated tyrosine residues
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00707
[2]
noteFragment binds FSHR and produces measurable biological effects; no cross-receptor data reported, making selectivity an open and testable question
[3]
paper
FSHR context: clinical use of FSH for in vitro fertilization highlights therapeutic relevance of receptor selectivity
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00148
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.7417252659797668 boltz-2
ranking score 0.7386017441749573 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde1.264global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Tyr-Thr-Arg-Asp-Leu-Val-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Pro-Ala-Arg-Pro-Asn-Thr-Gln-Ile-Val-Tyr-Asn-Pro
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Fertility hormone fragment that switches on the FSH receptor (FSH β 33: 53) (pep-10788, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10788
@peptide{pep10788,
  sequence = {YTRDLVYKDPARPNTQIVYNP},
  target   = {fshr},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 6 papers
[1]
Biased Signaling and Allosteric Modulation at the FSHR
Landomiel, F. et al. Frontiers in Endocrinology 2019
supporting
[2] supporting
[3] supporting
[5] supporting
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use