pe
pep-10707 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Neuromedin U-23: rat gut-brain peptide for energy, stress & muscle research

A small signaling peptide from rats that helps control hunger, stress, and gut muscle squeezing; used only as a laboratory research tool, not a medicine.

statuscomputed targetNTSR1 length23 aa refs8
status 2 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.752
pTM0.777
avg pLDDT70.8
ranking score0.717
STRUCTURE · PEP-10707 × NTSR1
ranking0.717
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence23 aa
1510152023
YKVNEYQGPVAP SGGFFLFRPRN
overview readme

What this is

Neuromedin U-23 (rat) is the rodent form of neuromedin U — a neuropeptide that regulates energy balance, smooth muscle contraction, the stress response, and pain signaling. The "U" in the name comes from its original defining property: potent stimulation of uterine smooth muscle contraction (uterotonic activity). Rat neuromedin U is 23 amino acids long, two residues shorter than the pig and human versions, and carries a C-terminal amide cap (–NH₂) not represented in the raw stored sequence; that amide-capped C-terminal heptapeptide is the structurally conserved pharmacophore responsible for receptor activation across species. In research settings, rat NMU-23 is used as a tool compound to probe the biology of neuromedin U receptors, particularly NMUR2, and to study how this neuropeptide intersects with dopamine signaling, energy homeostasis, and tumor microenvironments.

History

Neuromedin U was first isolated from porcine spinal cord by Minamino, Kangawa, and Matsuo in 1985, as part of a broader effort to characterize smooth-muscle-stimulating neuropeptides in neural tissue. The "U" designation reflected the peptide's potent uterotonic action in assays run at the time of discovery. The rat-specific 23-residue form was subsequently isolated and sequenced by the same group in 1988 (Minamino, Kangawa, Honzawa, and Matsuo; Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 156:355–360), which found nine amino acid replacements and two amino acid deletions relative to pig NMU-25, while the C-terminal heptapeptide remained fully conserved — and confirmed that rat NMU-23 was approximately twice as potent as pig NMU-25 in uterotonic assays. For over a decade after its discovery, the receptors for neuromedin U were unknown. In 2000, multiple independent groups — including Howard, Kojima, Fujii, and Hosoya and their respective colleagues — deorphanized two G protein-coupled receptors as the cognate neuromedin U receptors, now designated NMUR1 and NMUR2, catalyzing a rapid expansion of research into the peptide's roles in metabolism, stress, and cancer biology (Malendowicz and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2021).

What it does

Neuromedin U-23 activates two receptors, NMUR1 and NMUR2, which differ in where they are expressed and what happens when they are stimulated. NMUR1 is found primarily in peripheral tissues — the gut, lung, and other organs — while NMUR2 is expressed predominantly in the central nervous system, especially the hypothalamus and spinal cord. When neuromedin U reaches NMUR2 in the brain, it suppresses food intake and elevates energy expenditure, producing anti-obesity effects in rodents. Centrally administered NMU also activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress axis by stimulating corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) neurons, leading to ACTH and cortisol release. In the spinal cord, NMU-23 binding sites concentrate in the superficial dorsal horn — a region involved in pain processing — and intracerebroventricular administration of NMU increases pain sensitivity in rats. In the cardiovascular system, NMU produces brief elevations in blood pressure and causes endothelium-independent vasoconstriction in human arterial preparations. In the nucleus accumbens, central NMU signaling attenuates amphetamine-induced dopamine release and locomotor stimulation, implicating the peptide in reward circuit modulation (Vallöf and colleagues, PLOS ONE, 2016). Outside the nervous system, NMUR1 signaling in the tumor microenvironment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) suppresses the anti-tumor activity of CD8+ T cells while promoting glycolysis in tumor cells (Zheng and colleagues, Cancer Science, 2024).

Evidence

  • Human: No interventional clinical trials have been published for neuromedin U-23. In human pancreatic cancer tissue, NMU and its receptors are significantly overexpressed compared to healthy pancreatic tissue — NMUR2 mRNA was found approximately 149-fold higher in tumor relative to normal tissue — and elevated NMU serum levels correlate with poor PDAC prognosis (Ketterer and colleagues, Cancer Letters, 2009). Genetic variants in the human NMU gene (NMUAla19Glu and NMUArg165Trp) have been associated with altered metabolic phenotypes, including obesity onset (Malendowicz and colleagues, Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2021).
  • Animal: Central administration of NMU reduces food intake and body weight in rats and mice, with effects mediated primarily through hypothalamic NMUR2. NMU knockout mice develop increased food intake and obesity, while NMU overexpression produces leanness. Rat NMU-23 shows approximately two-fold greater uterotonic potency than pig NMU-25 in smooth muscle preparations. In NMUR2-deficient mice, nociceptive responses are impaired. Central NMU administration significantly attenuated amphetamine-induced accumbal dopamine release and locomotor stimulation in rodents, with peak attenuation at 60 minutes post-administration (Vallöf and colleagues, PLOS ONE, 2016). NMU-knockout mice showed prolonged survival and reduced tumor burden in pancreatic cancer models (Zheng and colleagues, Cancer Science, 2024).
  • In vitro: NMU overexpression in pancreatic cancer cell lines induces c-Met expression and increases HGF-mediated cell scattering and invasiveness; silencing NMU reverses these effects. NMUR1 activation in PDAC cells elevates glycolytic enzyme activity (pyruvate kinase, lactate dehydrogenase) and lactate production, which suppresses CD8+ T cell function. Structural studies of the cryo-EM complexes of human NMUR1 and NMUR2 confirmed that the conserved C-terminal heptapeptide (FLFRPRN-NH₂) establishes the core receptor-binding contacts at both subtypes, with sub-nanomolar affinity (You and colleagues, Nature Communications, 2022).

Known effects

  • Uterotonic smooth muscle contraction — In vitro, original bioassay (rat and pig preparations)
  • Food intake suppression and energy expenditure increase — Preclinical (rodent central administration, knockout models)
  • HPA axis activation / stress response — Preclinical (rodent; CRH-dependent)
  • Blood pressure elevation / vasoconstriction — Preclinical and ex vivo human vascular tissue
  • Pro-nociception (increased pain sensitivity) — Preclinical (rat intracerebroventricular administration)
  • Dopamine modulation in nucleus accumbens — Preclinical (attenuation of amphetamine-induced reward)
  • Tumor microenvironment immunosuppression (PDAC) — Preclinical and human tissue expression (NMUR1-dependent CD8+ T cell suppression)
  • Pancreatic cancer invasiveness — In vitro and human tissue (c-Met/HGF pathway)

Safety signals

No clinical safety data exist for exogenously administered neuromedin U-23 in humans, as the peptide has not entered clinical trials. Rodent studies using central NMU administration report activation of the stress axis (corticosterone elevation, anxiety-like behaviors) and increased pain sensitivity as pharmacodynamic effects rather than adverse events. NMU signaling in tumor biology is associated with immunosuppression and disease progression in pancreatic cancer, suggesting that in the context of PDAC, endogenous NMU may be detrimental by damping anti-tumor immunity (Zheng and colleagues, Cancer Science, 2024).

Regulatory status

  • US: Not approved. No IND or clinical trial registration identified for rat NMU-23 or human NMU formulations.
  • Research use: Available as a synthetic peptide reagent for laboratory research into NMUR1/NMUR2 pharmacology, energy homeostasis, and cancer biology.
  • WADA: Not listed on the WADA Prohibited List.

Mechanism

Rat neuromedin U-23 is a 23-residue neuropeptide with the sequence YKVNEYQGPVAPSGGFFLFRPRN; the active drug carries a C-terminal amide (–NH₂) on the asparagine at position 23 that is essential for receptor binding and is absent from the raw stored sequence. The C-terminal heptapeptide FLFRPRN-NH₂ is fully conserved across mammalian species and constitutes the receptor-binding pharmacophore; the N-terminal extension (positions 1–16) shows species-specific variation and is less critical for receptor activation. Both NMUR1 and NMUR2 are class A GPCRs that couple predominantly to Gq/11 (mobilizing intracellular calcium and activating PI signaling) and also to Gi/o (inhibiting cAMP). Cryo-EM structural studies of human NMUR1 and NMUR2 show that the amidated asparagine at the C-terminus and the arginine at position 6 of the heptapeptide form an extensive polar interaction network with both receptor subtypes at sub-nanomolar affinity, explaining the conserved pan-receptor binding of endogenous NMU forms across subtypes (You and colleagues, Nature Communications, 2022). NMUR1 is expressed mainly in the gastrointestinal tract, lung, and peripheral tissues, and signals primarily via Gαq; NMUR2 is expressed predominantly in hypothalamic nuclei and the spinal dorsal horn, and shows stronger coupling to Gαi. Rat NMU-23's approximately two-fold greater uterotonic potency relative to the pig 25-residue form is attributable to N-terminal sequence differences that modulate receptor engagement kinetics without altering the core binding pharmacophore.

In the hypothalamus, NMUR2 activation by NMU suppresses orexigenic signaling and stimulates CRH neurons, linking the peptide to both energy balance and the HPA stress axis. In the nucleus accumbens, central NMU signaling dampens dopaminergic transmission, reducing amphetamine-induced dopamine overflow and reward-associated locomotion. In the tumor microenvironment of PDAC, NMU signaling through NMUR1 on tumor-infiltrating immune cells suppresses IFN-γ, perforin, and granzyme B production by CD8+ T cells, while simultaneously promoting aerobic glycolysis in tumor cells via pyruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase activation — a dual mechanism that both disarms immune surveillance and fuels tumor metabolism (Zheng and colleagues, Cancer Science, 2024).

Related peptides

  • Neuromedin S peptide — a 33-residue paralog sharing the conserved C-terminal heptapeptide; co-activates NMUR1 and NMUR2 with comparable potency and has partially overlapping roles in energy homeostasis and circadian rhythm regulation
  • Neurotensin — a structurally unrelated 13-residue neuropeptide that acts at the neurotensin receptor NTSR1; expressed in many of the same hypothalamic and brainstem circuits as neuromedin U but pharmacologically distinct — NMU effects on food intake and body weight persist in NTSR1-knockout mice (Rümenapf and colleagues, American Journal of Physiology, 2009)
Hypotheses4 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

In neuromedin U-23, does the species-variable front end of the peptide determine whether it targets gut receptors or brain receptors, while the identical back end is responsible for activating either?

If true, drug designers could engineer modified NMU fragments that selectively target either the brain circuits controlling appetite and stress or the gut circuits controlling digestion, enabling more precise treatments for obesity, irritable bowel syndrome, or stress disorders.

The hypothesis
The C-terminal heptapeptide FFLFRPRN, conserved across species in neuromedin U, functions as an autonomous pharmacophore capable of activating NMUR2 independently, and the species-variable N-terminal 16 residues of rat NMU-23 primarily determine receptor subtype selectivity ratio (NMUR1 vs NMUR2) rather than intrinsic efficacy.
Why it’s plausible
The readme states the C-terminal heptapeptide is the structurally conserved pharmacophore across species, while the N-terminal region varies (nine substitutions and two deletions between rat 23-mer and pig 25-mer). If the N-terminal extension modulates receptor subtype ratio without contributing to Emax, then truncated C-terminal fragments should be full agonists with altered NMUR1/NMUR2 selectivity, a structure-function claim with direct therapeutic implications for subtype-selective NMU analogs.
Why it matters
NMUR1 is predominantly peripheral (gut, smooth muscle) while NMUR2 is central (hypothalamus, energy balance, stress). An N-terminus-dependent subtype selectivity rule would allow rational engineering of CNS-selective vs. peripheral-selective NMU analogs.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.60
Impact.70
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteReadme explicitly identifies the C-terminal heptapeptide as the conserved pharmacophore and notes 9 amino acid replacements plus 2 deletions in the rat N-terminal region relative to porcine NMU, while the C-terminal 7 residues are fully conserved.
[2]
sequenceYKVNEYQGPVAPSGGFFLFRPRN: the C-terminal FFLFRPRN (8 residues including Asn-NH2 in active form) is the pharmacophore; the remaining 15 N-terminal residues are the variable region whose role in receptor subtype selectivity is the hypothesis.
[3]
sourceStructural study showing van der Waals contacts and transmembrane residue interactions (F331 highlighted) provides precedent for identifying specific residue contacts in GPCR-peptide binding that could be mapped to NMU receptor subtypes.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Is rat neuromedin U-23 incorrectly linked to the neurotensin receptor in this record, and would correcting this to its actual receptor reveal different biology?

If true, fixing this mislabeling would prevent researchers from designing experiments or drugs based on a false premise, and would ensure the peptide's genuine roles in energy balance and stress responses are properly studied and developed.

The hypothesis
The annotated target of rat NMU-23 (NTSR1, neurotensin receptor 1) is incorrect or represents a secondary off-target interaction; the primary cognate receptors are NMUR1 and NMUR2, and the moderate ipTM=0.752 against NTSR1 reflects genuine poor fit rather than confident binding, consistent with sequence-level mismatch between NMU and neurotensin pharmacophores.
Why it’s plausible
Rat NMU-23's endogenous receptors are neuromedin U receptor 1 (NMUR1) and NMUR2, as described in the readme. The annotated target NTSR1 is the neurotensin receptor, which canonically binds neurotensin (ELYENKPRRPYIL) sharing no obvious sequence homology with NMU-23 (YKVNEYQGPVAPSGGFFLFRPRN). The structure prediction ipTM=0.752 is notably lower than other peptides in this batch (0.94, 0.98, 0.86, 0.96) and may reflect this target mismatch. The literature snippet from doi:10.3389/fendo.2012.00184 describes neurotensin biology and NTSR1/NTSR2 receptors in a context separate from NMU.
Why it matters
If the NTSR1 annotation is wrong, any hypothesis or drug-development effort premised on NMU-23 as an NTSR1 ligand would be misdirected. Correcting the target to NMUR1/NMUR2 would align the peptide with its established biology in energy homeostasis, stress, and smooth muscle.
Plausibility.85
Novelty.40
Impact.70
Basis · grounding1 paper · 3 computed/notes
[1]
structureipTM=0.752 is the lowest in this batch, consistent with poor fit to the annotated NTSR1 target, supporting the hypothesis that NTSR1 is not the primary receptor for this peptide.
[2]
noteReadme describes NMUR2 as the primary research target for rat NMU-23 and makes no mention of NTSR1; the annotated target is inconsistent with the readme biology.
[3]
paper
Review of NTSR1, NTSR2, and NTSR3 describes neurotensin receptor biology without mention of NMU, confirming these are pharmacologically distinct receptor systems.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2012.00184
[4]
sequenceYKVNEYQGPVAPSGGFFLFRPRN shares no sequence motif with canonical neurotensin ELYENKPRRPYIL; the conserved NMU C-terminal heptapeptide FFLFRPRN is the pharmacophore for NMUR1/NMUR2 activation.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does neuromedin U act in the brain to turn up the body's stress-hormone response, and could blocking its receptor help people with anxiety disorders or PTSD regain control over their stress system?

If true, drugs blocking the neuromedin U brain receptor could provide a completely new type of anti-anxiety or anti-stress treatment that works differently from existing medications, potentially helping people who do not respond to current therapies.

The hypothesis
Rat NMU-23 signaling through NMUR2 in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus potentiates corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) release and thereby amplifies the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) stress axis, predicting that NMUR2 antagonism would reduce stress-induced cortisol dysregulation in conditions such as anxiety disorders or post-traumatic stress.
Why it’s plausible
The readme explicitly describes NMU as regulating the stress response, and NMUR2 is the dominant central receptor. The HPA axis and CRH neurons in the paraventricular nucleus are the primary central stress coordinators. If NMU-23/NMUR2 signaling converges on CRH neurons, then the peptide's stress-regulatory role may be mediated via HPA amplification, making NMUR2 antagonists a novel anti-stress target class.
Why it matters
Stress-related disorders including PTSD, generalized anxiety, and burnout-associated cortisol dysregulation affect hundreds of millions globally. NMUR2 antagonists would represent a mechanistically distinct class from current anxiolytics (benzodiazepines, SSRIs).
Plausibility.65
Novelty.60
Impact.75
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteReadme explicitly lists stress response regulation as one of the key biological functions of neuromedin U.
[2]
noteReadme identifies NMUR2 as the primary central receptor investigated in research settings, consistent with hypothalamic expression of NMUR2 in paraventricular nucleus neurons.
[3]
sourceStructural study of GPCR-ligand interactions provides mechanistic context for how a neuropeptide GPCR such as NMUR2 engages its ligand at specific transmembrane contacts.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Does neuromedin U, a gut-brain peptide, signal within tumors in a way that keeps immune cells from attacking the cancer, and could blocking this signal make immunotherapy drugs work better?

If true, combining a neuromedin U blocker with existing cancer immunotherapy drugs could improve how many patients respond to treatment, potentially benefiting the large fraction of cancer patients for whom checkpoint inhibitors currently fail.

The hypothesis
NMU-23 signaling through NMUR1 in tumor microenvironments suppresses anti-tumor immune cell infiltration, such that pharmacological NMUR1 blockade (or reduction of endogenous NMU signaling) in NMU-expressing tumors would improve responses to immune checkpoint immunotherapy.
Why it’s plausible
The readme mentions that NMU intersects with tumor microenvironments. NMUR1 is highly expressed in peripheral tissues including those relevant to tumor vasculature and immune cell trafficking. If NMU-NMUR1 signaling in tumors mimics its known role in smooth muscle contraction to limit immune cell extravasation, or directly signals on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, then NMUR1 antagonism could be a combination partner for PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.
Why it matters
Improving immune checkpoint therapy response rates is one of the highest-value targets in oncology. An NMU-NMUR1 axis in tumor immune exclusion would represent a novel, non-redundant immunotherapy combination target.
Plausibility.50
Novelty.70
Impact.80
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteReadme explicitly mentions tumor microenvironments as one of the research contexts in which NMU biology is studied.
[2]
noteReadme describes NMUR1 as a peripheral receptor expressed in gut and smooth muscle tissues, consistent with expression in tumor vasculature and stroma.
[3]
sequenceYKVNEYQGPVAPSGGFFLFRPRN at 23 aa contains the conserved FFLFRPRN pharmacophore necessary for NMUR1 activation, establishing this peptide as a tool to probe NMUR1-mediated tumor microenvironment effects.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.7518717646598816 boltz-2
ranking score 0.7170262932777405 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde1.308global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Tyr-Lys-Val-Asn-Glu-Tyr-Gln-Gly-Pro-Val-Ala-Pro-Ser-Gly-Gly-Phe-Phe-Leu-Phe-Arg-Pro-Arg-Asn
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Neuromedin U-23: rat gut-brain peptide for energy, stress & muscle research (pep-10707, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10707
@peptide{pep10707,
  sequence = {YKVNEYQGPVAPSGGFFLFRPRN},
  target   = {ntsr1},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {computed}
}
related peptides 2 by signal overlap
clinical trials 0 trials · checked 2026-05-22
0
no registered clinical trials as of 2026-05-22; we'll re-check periodically
references 8 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use