pe
pep-10639 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0

Brain-signaling research fragment (Neurotensin 8-13)

A tiny piece of the natural brain peptide neurotensin that switches on its receptor; used in labs to study pain, dopamine circuits, and pancreatic cancer detection, a research tool, not an approved drug.

statussynthesized targetNTSR1 length6 aa refs8
status 4 / 5
prediction metrics boltz-2 1.0
ipTM0.977
pTM0.835
avg pLDDT74.9
ranking score0.795
STRUCTURE · PEP-10639 × NTSR1
ranking0.795
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
boltz-2 1.0 · mmCIF ↓ download
sequence6 aa
156
RRPYIL
overview readme

What this is

Neurotensin (8-13) is the six-amino-acid C-terminal fragment of neurotensin, a naturally occurring 13-residue neuropeptide first isolated from bovine hypothalamus in 1973 by Carraway and Leeman. The fragment — sequence Arg-Arg-Pro-Tyr-Ile-Leu — is the shortest portion of the parent peptide that retains full binding and activation of the neurotensin type 1 receptor (NTSR1), making it the defining minimal pharmacophore of the neurotensin family (Besserer-Offroy and colleagues 2017; White and colleagues 2012). Because it captures everything needed to turn on the receptor in just six residues, it has become a widely used research tool for studying NTSR1 biology and as a scaffold for designing more stable drug candidates.

History

Neurotensin itself was discovered in 1973 when Carraway and Leeman were purifying substance P from bovine hypothalamus extracts. The isolation of neurotensin was guided by an unexpected observation: intravenous injection of the crude extract caused a characteristic vasodilatation around the face and ears of experimental animals. The peptide was named "neurotensin" to reflect both its presence in neural tissue and its ability to affect vascular tone. Its full 13-amino-acid sequence — pyroGlu-Leu-Tyr-Glu-Asn-Lys-Pro-Arg-Arg-Pro-Tyr-Ile-Leu — was established by Edman degradation and carboxypeptidase treatment of enzymatic fragments.

The C-terminal (8-13) fragment was subsequently identified as the minimal active sequence required for high-affinity receptor binding and functional activation (Besserer-Offroy and colleagues 2017). It does not occur as a distinct endogenous peptide in vivo, but serves as the essential template for a large body of medicinal chemistry aimed at creating metabolically stable analogs.

What it does

In the brain, neurotensin (8-13) activates NTSR1 to modulate two well-characterized circuits: the dopamine system and pain pathways. On the dopamine side, activation of NTSR1 at dopaminergic axon terminals enhances dopamine release, primarily by inhibiting the function of presynaptic D2 autoreceptors (Threlfell and colleagues 2009). More than 80% of dopaminergic neurons in the mesocortical, mesolimbic, and nigrostriatal pathways express NTSR1, positioning the neurotensin system as a broad modulator of dopaminergic tone. This interaction has attracted interest in the context of schizophrenia, where cerebrospinal fluid neurotensin levels are reduced in drug-free patients and tend to normalize during effective antipsychotic treatment (Austin and colleagues 2000).

On the pain side, neurotensin (8-13) produces antinociceptive effects through both NTS1 and NTS2 receptors by a mechanism that is not blocked by opioid antagonists — distinguishing it from classical analgesic peptides.

Beyond neuroscience, NTSR1 is overexpressed in the majority of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and in several other tumor types, which has made the neurotensin (8-13) scaffold a starting point for radiolabeled tumor-imaging agents. Maes and colleagues (2006) developed ⁹⁹ᵐTc-labeled neurotensin analogs based on this scaffold for imaging NTSR1-positive tumors.

Evidence

  • Human: No clinical trials have been conducted with neurotensin (8-13) itself. The peptide's extremely short plasma half-life (under 2 minutes) precludes direct clinical use; it functions as a research and medicinal chemistry tool. No registered trials on ClinicalTrials.gov for "neurotensin 8-13."
  • Animal: Neurotensin (8-13) analogs reduce amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and improve prepulse inhibition in rodent models of psychosis, consistent with antipsychotic-like activity (reviewed in Boules and colleagues 2014). Antinociceptive effects have been documented in both acute and inflammatory pain models following intrathecal administration or direct injection into pain-modulating brain regions.
  • In vitro: White and colleagues (2012) resolved the crystal structure of NTSR1 bound to neurotensin (8-13), establishing the molecular basis of binding. Deluigi and colleagues (2021) used the peptide as a reference full agonist (EC50 2.06 nM in Gq IP1 accumulation assay) to benchmark NTSR1 agonism across a series of small-molecule ligands. Huang and colleagues (2020) solved the cryo-EM structure of the NTSR1–β-arrestin 1 complex using neurotensin (8-13) as the activating ligand. Maharana and colleagues (2021) determined the NTSR1–Gi complex structure in a lipid environment.

Known effects

  • NTSR1 full agonism — Established in vitro; EC50 2.06 nM (Gq pathway, Deluigi and colleagues 2021)
  • Dopamine release enhancement — Preclinical; via presynaptic D2 autoreceptor inhibition (Threlfell and colleagues 2009)
  • Antipsychotic-like activity — Preclinical animal models only; NT analogs suppress amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and improve prepulse inhibition
  • Opioid-independent antinociception — Preclinical; mediated via NTS1 and NTS2 receptors
  • Tumor-targeted imaging scaffold — Preclinical; ⁹⁹ᵐTc-labeled analogs show uptake in NTSR1-overexpressing tumors in animal models (Maes and colleagues 2006)

Safety signals

No clinical safety data exist for neurotensin (8-13), as it has not entered human studies. Its native half-life of under 2 minutes in plasma — due to rapid cleavage at Arg8-Arg9 by nephrilysin, at Pro10-Tyr11 by thimetoligopeptidase, and at Tyr11-Ile12 by neurolysin — means that systemic administration delivers negligible intact peptide. Hypothermia and hypotension are known effects of central neurotensin system activation in animals, consistent with known cardiovascular and thermoregulatory actions of NTSR1. These effects inform the safety profile considerations for NT-based analog programs rather than for the native fragment itself.

Mechanism

Neurotensin (8-13) binds to NTSR1, a class A G-protein-coupled receptor, in an extended conformation nearly perpendicular to the membrane plane with its C-terminus oriented toward the receptor core. The binding pocket spans the N-terminus, three extracellular loops, and transmembrane helices TM2-TM7, with positively charged arginines (Arg8, Arg9) engaging an electronegative rim at the extracellular face and the Tyr-Ile-Leu triad making contacts deeper in the pocket (White and colleagues 2012). Upon binding, the peptide induces contraction of the extracellular binding pocket, stabilizing an active receptor conformation that couples preferentially to Gq/11 protein and triggers IP1 accumulation and protein kinase C activation (Besserer-Offroy and colleagues 2017; Deluigi and colleagues 2021). Receptor phosphorylation by GRK5 at intracellular loop 3 and C-terminal sites then enables β-arrestin 1 recruitment — a process structurally characterized at 4.2 Å by Huang and colleagues (2020), who found that a phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate molecule bridges the receptor and arrestin. Maharana and colleagues (2021) resolved the complex in a native-like lipid bilayer environment, providing additional detail on the Gi coupling mode.

The fragment's rapid proteolytic degradation (half-life <2 min) at three distinct cleavage sites has driven a field of NT(8-13)-based medicinal chemistry, with backbone modifications — including pseudopeptide bonds and unnatural amino acids at key cleavage positions — extending plasma stability from minutes to over 24 hours in some analogs while preserving NTSR1 agonist activity.

Open questions

  • No metabolically stable NT(8-13) analog has yet completed human clinical trials for any indication
  • The relative contributions of NTS1 vs NTS2 to opioid-independent antinociception remain under investigation; NTS2-selective analogs are an active area of development
  • Selectivity for NTSR1 over NTSR2 (neurotensin type 2 receptor) in the parent NT(8-13) fragment means dual-receptor pharmacology requires structural modification
  • The precise mechanism by which NTSR1 activation normalizes CSF neurotensin levels in schizophrenia has not been fully resolved

Related peptides

  • Full-length neurotensin (1-13) — the parent 13-residue neuropeptide from which this fragment is derived; carries the N-terminal pyroGlu cap and full sequence not required for NTSR1 activation
  • Neuromedin N — a related hexapeptide (Lys-Ile-Pro-Tyr-Ile-Leu) that activates both NTSR1 and NTSR2 and shares structural similarity with NT(8-13); characterized alongside NT(8-13) in Besserer-Offroy and colleagues (2017)
Hypotheses5 directions▾ collapse

Research directions for this peptide, selected from the current sources — hypotheses you can explore and model. None of it is proven yet; tap any one to see the full thinking.

openupdated 2026-06-05

Do the neurotensin and GLP-1 satiety signals travel to the brain through different nerve fibers, making them independently stackable for stronger appetite control?

If the two pathways are separate, combining a neurotensin-based drug with existing obesity medications like semaglutide could produce stronger weight loss with lower doses of each, potentially reducing the nausea and vomiting that cause many patients to stop treatment.

The hypothesis
NTSR1 activation by NT(8-13) in the gut promotes satiety through a vagal afferent pathway that is mechanistically independent of GLP-1 release, meaning NT(8-13) and GLP-1 receptor agonists could have additive or synergistic effects on food intake reduction.
Why it’s plausible
Neurotensin is released from N cells in the small intestine after fat ingestion and is known to act both centrally and peripherally to reduce food intake. NTSR1 is expressed on vagal afferent neurons that relay satiety signals to the brainstem. GLP-1 acts on a separate receptor (GLP-1R) on overlapping but distinct vagal populations. If the two pathways converge on different nodose ganglion subpopulations, combining NTSR1 and GLP-1R agonism could achieve greater satiety signaling at doses that individually produce only partial effects, reducing the GI side effects that limit GLP-1 monotherapy dose escalation.
Why it matters
Demonstrating mechanistic independence would provide scientific rationale for combination therapy targeting obesity, a major unmet need given tolerability limitations of current GLP-1 monotherapy at high doses.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.50
Impact.80
Basis · grounding3 computed/notes
[1]
noteNT(8-13) activates NTSR1 with full agonist efficacy; NTSR1 is expressed in gut and brain regions controlling feeding behavior.
[2]
sourceReviews ligand-directed receptor signaling and the diversity of downstream outputs that can be engaged by different agonists at the same receptor family.
[3]
sourceNotes the importance of demonstrating efficacy in clinically relevant contexts, supporting the need to test combination approaches rather than single-agent paradigms.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Would swapping one amino acid building block for a fluorine-bearing version force this peptide into its active shape before it even reaches the receptor?

If this single change increases potency, it could help create a more effective non-opioid pain treatment or a neuroprotective drug for stroke, using a modification already proven safe in other drug candidates.

The hypothesis
Substituting Pro3 of NT(8-13) with a 4-fluoroproline increases the thermal stability of the NTSR1-bound peptide conformation by reinforcing the trans-amide bond bias, resulting in higher potency and prolonged receptor activation without altering selectivity between NTSR1 and NTSR2.
Why it’s plausible
Pro3 in RRPYIL (Arg-Arg-Pro-Tyr-Ile-Leu) is a structural pivot enforcing a turn-like conformation that presents Tyr4 and Ile-Leu into the orthosteric pocket. 4-Fluoroproline substitution is well-established to favor the trans-amide rotamer due to a gauche effect, rigidifying proline-containing peptides. This would pre-organize the bioactive conformation in solution, reducing the entropic cost of binding. NTSR1 versus NTSR2 selectivity is primarily determined by PYIL contacts, which would not be altered by a proline ring substitution.
Why it matters
Selective NTSR1 agonists with improved potency are sought for hypothermia induction in stroke and as non-opioid analgesics; a single fluorine substitution achieving this via conformational pre-organization is a tractable, synthetically accessible modification.
Plausibility.70
Novelty.55
Impact.65
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
sequenceNT(8-13) = RRPYIL; Pro at position 3 is the central conformational determinant linking the RR N-cap to the PYIL pharmacophore.
[2]
paper
Structural data confirm the geometry of the neurotensin binding site at NTSR1, supporting that pre-organizing the proline turn would reduce binding entropy.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5504
[3]
paper
Discusses rationale for amino acid substitutions in peptides to improve stability and activity, consistent with fluoroproline engineering logic.
doi: 10.1248/cpb.c25-00478
openupdated 2026-06-05

Do the two arginine residues at the front of this peptide grip the outside of its brain receptor and slow the peptide from detaching?

If this slower detachment is confirmed, drug designers could exploit it to create longer-acting treatments for pain or body-temperature disorders, reducing how often patients need dosing.

The hypothesis
The tandem RR dipeptide at the N-terminus of NT(8-13) does not contribute to NTSR1 orthosteric binding but instead engages a positively charged allosteric vestibule on NTSR1's extracellular loops, slowing the dissociation rate and thereby prolonging receptor occupancy relative to analogues truncated at position 10.
Why it’s plausible
Structural data on NTSR1 (White et al. 2012, doi:10.1038/nature11558) show the C-terminal PYIL tetrapeptide deeply buried in the orthosteric pocket, while the N-terminal RR residues project toward the extracellular face. The extracellular loops of NTSR1 carry a mix of charged residues. A slow-off kinetics mechanism driven by electrostatic contacts at the vestibule would explain why NT(8-13) maintains full agonism despite the positively charged RR being adjacent to an already-cationic receptor environment.
Why it matters
If RR slows dissociation via an extracellular vestibule, designing analogues that reinforce this contact could yield ultra-long-acting NTSR1 agonists for pain or hypothermia without requiring chemical modifications that increase toxicity.
Plausibility.65
Novelty.60
Impact.65
Basis · grounding2 papers · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
NTSR1 crystal structure with neurotensin-like ligands shows C-terminal PYIL in orthosteric pocket; N-terminal residues face ECL region.
doi: 10.1038/nature11558
[2]
paper
Structural study of NTSR1 highlights F331(6.58) and TM regions important for ligand binding; ECL2 omitted for clarity, suggesting extracellular loop contacts are not fully resolved.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5504
[3]
sequenceNT(8-13) = RRPYIL; RR at positions 1-2 are fully solvent-exposed in the expected binding pose where PYIL occupies the deep pocket.
[4]
structureBoltz-2 ipTM 0.977, the highest among this batch, strongly supporting a well-defined binding pose consistent with an additional stabilizing contact beyond the core PYIL.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Do the last two building blocks of this peptide act as a molecular key that fits one neurotensin receptor but not its close relative?

If this selectivity mechanism is confirmed, drug designers could tune the tail of neurotensin-derived compounds to hit only the receptor associated with pain relief, avoiding the one that might worsen chronic pain.

The hypothesis
The Ile5-Leu6 C-terminal dipeptide of NT(8-13) is the primary determinant of selectivity for NTSR1 over NTSR2, because NTSR2's binding pocket accommodates shorter hydrophobic C-termini less efficiently due to a cavity-restricting substitution at the equivalent of NTSR1 position F331.
Why it’s plausible
NTSR1 and NTSR2 share the neurotensin pharmacophore but differ in affinity for C-terminally truncated analogues. The structural data (doi:10.1126/sciadv.abe5504) identify F331(6.58) in NTSR1 as a key hydrophobic contact for the C-terminal residues of the ligand. NTSR2 has a divergent residue at this position. If Ile5-Leu6 packs specifically against F331 in NTSR1 but cannot make equivalent contacts in NTSR2, replacing them with bulkier or branched hydrophobics should enhance NTSR1 selectivity further, while truncation should reduce it.
Why it matters
NTSR1-selective agonists are preferred for analgesic applications to avoid NTSR2-mediated side effects including facilitation of pain sensitization reported in some studies; defining the structural basis of selectivity enables rational design.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.50
Impact.65
Basis · grounding1 paper · 2 computed/notes
[1]
paper
Crystal/cryo-EM structure of NTSR1 identifies F331(6.58) as a van der Waals contact for the C-terminal hydrophobic residues of the ligand.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe5504
[2]
sequenceNT(8-13) = RRPYIL; Ile-Leu at positions 5-6 are the C-terminal hydrophobic pair engaging the deep receptor pocket.
[3]
sourceReviews structure-activity relationships at neurotensin receptors, noting differential subtype selectivity of modified NT fragments.
openupdated 2026-06-05

Could activating the neurotensin receptor with this small peptide reduce the brain's excessive response to addictive drugs while leaving everyday enjoyment intact?

If true, this could form the basis of a new class of addiction treatments that reduce relapse-driving cravings without the flat, joyless state that makes existing dopamine-blocking drugs hard to tolerate.

The hypothesis
NT(8-13) attenuates dopamine-independent reward salience by reducing nucleus accumbens dopamine release through NTSR1 activation on presynaptic dopaminergic terminals, predicting that it could reduce the reinforcing properties of stimulant drugs without the dysphoria caused by full dopamine blockade.
Why it’s plausible
Neurotensin is co-released with dopamine in mesolimbic circuits, and NTSR1 is expressed on dopaminergic terminals where its activation dampens dopamine overflow. Antipsychotic drugs that block D2 receptors suppress psychosis but cause motor side effects and dysphoria because they broadly block dopamine signaling. NT(8-13), by modulating dopamine release presynaptically rather than blocking D2 post-synaptically, could reduce the incentive salience of drug cues selectively at active (recently firing) terminals via a use-dependent mechanism.
Why it matters
A neurotensin-based approach to addiction would address a major unmet need: curbing drug craving without precipitating withdrawal or anhedonia, which are primary drivers of relapse.
Plausibility.60
Novelty.40
Impact.75
Basis · grounding2 papers · 1 computed/note
[1]
paper
Reviews binding of antipsychotic drugs to brain receptors and discusses neurotensin receptor relevance to dopamine modulation.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.01.044
[2]
paper
Provides structural basis for NTSR1 agonism by the C-terminal neurotensin fragment, confirming NT(8-13) as the minimal pharmacophore for full receptor activation.
doi: 10.1038/nature11558
[3]
noteNT(8-13) is described as retaining full binding and activation of NTSR1, making it a complete agonist scaffold for probing dopamine-neurotensin interactions.
details expand to inspect
full evidence table2 metrics
metricvaluetool
ipTM 0.9769219756126404 boltz-2
ranking score 0.794795572757721 boltz-2
structural qualityopenfold3
metricvaluenote
gpde0.922global PDE — lower = better
disorderNaNfraction disordered
3-letter notation
Arg-Arg-Pro-Tyr-Ile-Leu
recipeboltz-2 1.0
parametervalue
modelboltz-2 1.0
weights
hardwarenvidia_nim_api
mlx version
python
random seed
msa strategynone
diffusion samples1
runtime
predicted bymlx@peptide
predicted at2026-04-24
citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Brain-signaling research fragment (Neurotensin 8-13) (pep-10639, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-10639
@peptide{pep10639,
  sequence = {RRPYIL},
  target   = {ntsr1},
  author   = {peptidemodel},
  year     = {2026},
  status   = {synthesized}
}
related peptides 5 by signal overlap
clinical trials 48 on ct.gov · 2 on EUCTR · checked 2026-05-09
ct.gov trials 48
with results 2
EUCTR 2
PubMed RCT 7
by phase
1phase 31phase 48no phase
by status
7completed1not yet recruiting1withdrawn1unknown
references 8 papers
discussion no comments
sign in to comment
peptidemodel.com CC-BY-SA-4.0 research only · not for human use