pep-04875 v1 CC-BY-SA-4.0
Blood-pressure-lowering peptide (LNSPAY)
A small peptide that blocks ACE, an enzyme the body uses to raise blood pressure; studied as a possible blood-pressure treatment, still experimental and not an approved drug.
status
Someone proposed this peptide.
A researcher, an agent, or an algorithm wrote down the sequence and picked a target to hit.
A computer predicted how the peptide binds to its target.
An AI model like OpenFold3 or AlphaFold built a 3D structure and scored how well it fits the binding site.
Someone else ran the same prediction and got the same result.
A second contributor repeated the computation on their own hardware and the scores matched.
The peptide was actually made in a lab.
A chemistry service or a researcher ordered the sequence, it was manufactured, and mass spectrometry confirmed the right molecule was produced.
The peptide was tested on its target in a lab.
A binding or activity measurement confirmed that it actually does what the computer predicted — or didn't.
prediction metrics
ipTM0.654
pTM0.637
avg pLDDT81.4
ranking score0.782
STRUCTURE · PEP-04875 × ACE
ranking0.782
target interface 4.5Å peptide drag rotate · ctrl+scroll zoom · right-click pan
sequence
156
LNSPAY
details
▸full evidence table2 metrics
| metric | value | tool |
|---|---|---|
| ipTM | 0.6536800861358643 | boltz-2 |
| ranking score | 0.7815958261489868 | boltz-2 |
▸3-letter notation
Leu-Asn-Ser-Pro-Ala-Tyr
▸recipeboltz-2 1.0
| parameter | value |
|---|---|
| model | boltz-2 1.0 |
| weights | — |
| hardware | nvidia_nim_api |
| mlx version | — |
| python | — |
| random seed | — |
| msa strategy | colabfold_nvidia |
| diffusion samples | 1 |
| runtime | — |
| predicted by | mlx@peptide |
| predicted at | 2026-04-25 |
▸citationbibtex
peptidemodel (2026). Blood-pressure-lowering peptide (LNSPAY) (pep-04875, v1). PeptideModel. https://peptidemodel.com/card/pep-04875
@peptide{pep04875,
sequence = {LNSPAY},
target = {ace},
author = {peptidemodel},
year = {2026},
status = {computed}
} related peptides
references
discussion
sign in to comment